air intake re routing?
Discussion
Hey guys, I am a new owner of a blue 92 Griff and just got the car a few weeks ago.
I read about the air intake improvements with hose and filter kits from ACT etc. but wonder if somebody ever thought to shorten the air intake significantly and avoid the hot air from the engine bay by re-routing directly from the plenum straight into the passenger footwell above the battery?
I know this most likely is a stupid idea
but since I can't figure out why not I thought I might ask the experts here.
Thanks for any thoughts.
I read about the air intake improvements with hose and filter kits from ACT etc. but wonder if somebody ever thought to shorten the air intake significantly and avoid the hot air from the engine bay by re-routing directly from the plenum straight into the passenger footwell above the battery?
I know this most likely is a stupid idea

Thanks for any thoughts.
Belle427 said:
You would have a nice induction noise though 
This 

I noticed more induction roar when I fitted the far more free flowing ACT set up.
It’s the sort of thing you do once and given a good life will last many years.
A good K&N filter is a good purchase too. I bet most air filters have not been changed for years.
They do last well though

When I bought my 92 Griff, it had only done a few thousand miles since the air filter had been replaced by a well known specialist.
When it reached 10,000 miles I thought I would take it off to assess its condition and either clean or replace.
Fell apart in my hands gov! That had not been changed for some time, and certainly wasn't restrictive as it wasn't doing any filtering either.
When it reached 10,000 miles I thought I would take it off to assess its condition and either clean or replace.
Fell apart in my hands gov! That had not been changed for some time, and certainly wasn't restrictive as it wasn't doing any filtering either.
Gassing Station | Griffith | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff