RE: Volvo C30 T5 | Spotted
RE: Volvo C30 T5 | Spotted
Tuesday 13th June 2023

Volvo C30 T5 | Spotted

The Focus ST's subdued Swedish sibling now looks a cool classic curio


The notion of fast Volvo estates being imported from Japan is fairly familiar by now. See the recently featured Polestar V60 T6 for proof of that. A fondness for the genre over here, combined with a limited supply and the availability of funky specs in Japan, has made the practice more commonplace in recent years. Strengthening values must have helped, too. Now it’s more than just V60s and V70s being brought over, because this is a Japanese Domestic Market C30 T5.

A rather nice one it looks, too, but we’ll get into that. The burning question is probably why a T5 is being brought over at all, because it seems like a niche choice even in Volvo circles. But it does make some sense. In a similar fashion to the big wagons, there’s really not much like a C30 out there - if you want one, nothing else is going to suffice. Moreover, the T5 gets the five-cylinder charm so desirable in the larger models, here sharing the 2.5-litre turbo in the old Focus ST tune, for 220hp and 236lb ft. This means it's fast as well as tuneful, scrabbling to 62mph in less than seven seconds and nudging 150mph flat out. Even without the traction advantage of cars like the V70 R, the C30 certainly qualifies as a fast Volvo.

As good examples of the 2.5-litre Focus ST become harder to find (and an interesting engine becomes more desirable by the day), so the C30’s case becomes stronger. The dearth of T5s in the UK will also have helped build the case to bring a Japanese car over. It was never a big seller in period, truth be told; those who wanted a 2.5-litre hot hatch were better served in the thrills department by the Focus ST with which it shared so much. Those who bought into the C30’s distinctive appearance would still get that with a smaller petrol or diesel engines. And if you needed a fast, spacious Volvo, the T5 estates were going to do the job much better than the three-door C30. Buyers had to really want the look and the five-cylinder performance to justify the T5. And stomach the price: in 2006 it cost £22,745, or just £1,000 less than a Golf R32.

So there were never that many: HowManyLeft reckons just 608 are remaining on our roads, across all the spec levels and pair of gearbox choices. Therefore getting a good used one is probably even trickier than expected, and makes such a seemingly nice import all the more desirable.

The spec here, which must have a more inspiring name somewhere than gold with grey, evokes the original (and quite smart) C30 Design Concept. It’s covered just 67,000 miles since 2007 and looks in fine fettle for it, with unmarked leather, a steering wheel free from wear and that dramatic floating centre dash without a scratch. It’s exactly as you’d like to see a C30 T5, apparently cherished over a decade and a half by people who knew what kind of rare groove hot hatch they were getting into. From the condition it would have to be assumed that maintenance has been kept up with over the years; hopefully there’s a nice wodge of paperwork with this import. You might not be able to understand any of it, but receipts in any language are always encouraging.

The catch? Well, it is an auto. Which will just be a five-speed, as a few still were back then. A six-speed T5 probably would have sold already. It could easily be argued that an automatic might suit the C30’s more mellow character (its Focus ST contemporary was manual only, tellingly), so it should be far from a dealbreaker. Especially at just £5,990; most of the Fords at this money will have six-figure mileages. And there’s not another 2.5-litre C30 on PH; indeed, you’ll only get a cheaper five-cylinder Volvo turbo by going older or higher mileage - or convertible. Just when it seemed like the affordable, interesting fast cars had disappeared, there’s a trusty T5 to the rescue.


SPECIFICATION | VOLVO C30 T5

Engine: 2,521cc, five-cyl turbo
Transmission: 5-speed auto, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 220@5,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 236@1,500rpm-4,800rpm
MPG: 30.1
CO2: 224g/km
Year registered: 2007
Recorded mileage: 67,303
Price new: £22,745 (UK, 2006)
Yours for: £5,990

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

Jon_S_Rally

Original Poster:

4,027 posts

106 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
I really like the C30. Nice looking car in the right spec, and has aged better than the Focus. There are a couple of problems with this one for me though. First is the two-tone, which I think ages the car massively. It would look 1,000% better in a single colour. Second is the gearbox. I've owned auto Volvos and it really takes the shine off that five-cylinder engine.

A manual in one colour, with a few suspension upgrades would make a great car.

AKjr

605 posts

29 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
I had one of these for four and a half years, although with a weedier engine as I was doing 20k miles a year and I didn't fancy the T5 fuel bill biggrin

It was a great car; comfortable, well equipped at the time and it never put a foot wrong.

I'll echo the above though, it's a shame that so many of the 5 pots are lumbered with the (frankly rubbish) auto box, although they're definitely not a hot hatch, so them being equipped with it isn't surprising.


Edited by AKjr on Tuesday 13th June 07:06

Davie

5,644 posts

233 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
Bit of a fast Volvo fanboy here but I'm struggling to see the appeal in that on various levels - colour combo, wheel choice, auto box and it's £7k which is quite a lot and would buy quite a lot as far as buying into T-5 life goes. You'd have to really, really want that C30...

Speed1283

1,188 posts

113 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
I love the be styling of these, just different. Wish I had got one years ago. They look great in a dark blue. Was less sure about the face lift though, didn't seem quite as nice from the front.

I imagine with a remap, some suspension mods and presumably an LSD fitted they'd be a bit more playful to drive.

Lo-Fi

1,160 posts

88 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
Davie said:
Bit of a fast Volvo fanboy here but I'm struggling to see the appeal in that on various levels - colour combo, wheel choice, auto box and it's £7k which is quite a lot and would buy quite a lot as far as buying into T-5 life goes. You'd have to really, really want that C30...
6k...

soad

34,085 posts

194 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
Davie said:
Bit of a fast Volvo fanboy here but I'm struggling to see the appeal in that on various levels - colour combo, wheel choice, auto box and it's £7k which is quite a lot and would buy quite a lot as far as buying into T-5 life goes. You'd have to really, really want that C30...
Your maths are out, by a £1010?

Beaten to it.

Dombilano

1,315 posts

73 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
G ear t r oni c

Davie

5,644 posts

233 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
Lo-Fi said:
6k...
I was factoring the costs to go get it, insure it, put copious amounts of fuel in it and have a few quid left to go towards changing those wheels.

Or...

I didn't read the advert properly.

But regardless, 30 seconds on Autotrader brings up these two for similar money... and both look infinitely more appealing.

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202305257...

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202304196...






Edited by Davie on Tuesday 13th June 08:00

AppleJuice

2,161 posts

103 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
There was also the 2.4i 5-pot if you weren't in quite such a rush

pb8g09

2,846 posts

87 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
Agree with the above posted - the two tone colour on this makes me think of an old people's home.

Combined with the sh*t window deflectors (presume that's for smokers so they don't get wet when having a fag at the wheel?), auto gearbox and the lack of an LSD means I really don't see any appeal in this one.

They've always been on the 'maybe' list for me when searching in the past for something interesting, but only with a manual and a nice colour.

Water Fairy

6,222 posts

173 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
It was all going so well until..................


that gearbox!


I'm out.

Quickmoose

5,093 posts

141 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
I had an all-pearlescent-white, manual one about a decade ago....
proper Q car, but very composed when hooning around the curves, so not an exciting, engaging drive, but the Q-ness, build quality and design were really appealing. 4 individual seats inside made it quite funky inside too.
They key fails quite regularly, but other than that it was a reliable thing, but I don't 'miss it'.

Quhet

2,708 posts

164 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
To echo what others have said, this would look so much better in a bolder colour and nicer wheels. Looks a bit drab and not special enough tat the moment

MightyBadger

3,155 posts

68 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
Davie said:
I was factoring the costs to go get it, insure it, put copious amounts of fuel in it and have a few quid left to go towards changing those wheels.

Or...

I didn't read the advert properly.

But regardless, 30 seconds on Autotrader brings up these two for similar money... and both look infinitely more appealing.

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202305257...

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202304196...






Edited by Davie on Tuesday 13th June 08:00
That second one looks great. Just over 6 secs to 60 and manual, much more of a hot hatch than the one in the op imho.

GeniusOfLove

4,120 posts

30 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
I like these but that crap auto absolutely totally ruins them.

That one is a drab thing, probably the least desireable one in naff old colours, with a cuckbox, and without any cool options. Massively overpriced.

WayOutWest

930 posts

76 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
Speed1283 said:
I love the be styling of these, just different. Wish I had got one years ago. They look great in a dark blue. Was less sure about the face lift though, didn't seem quite as nice from the front.

I imagine with a remap, some suspension mods and presumably an LSD fitted they'd be a bit more playful to drive.
I had a pre-facelift T5 R Design in white. As this article alludes to, I had looked at a few Focus STs but they were all shagged boy racer examples and I also preferred the image and looks of the C30.

The standard C30 suspension is shocking the way it rolls - especially if you have driven a Focus ST before. After driving it home I started researching suspension literally the next day.
I added a budget Koni STR.T suspension kit, slightly wider tyres, uprated Mintex pads and a 270bhp remap. It was quite a transformation, but still not as good a steer as a Focus ST of the same year. From what I have read the more expensive Koni FSDs are probably a better option and the right balance between ride quality and handling. The STR.T dampers were not harsh, but couldn't deal with a bumpy B road very well.

I'd certainly be cautious about trying to turn it into a hot hatch, because it really isn't one (in the same manner as a Golf VR6 or V6 4 motion).
The manual gearbox isn't great, and the clutch feel and operation is really weird - and I've driven three of them, pre and post facelift, so they are all like that. The steering isn't as good as the Focus ST. The brakes are smaller, despite having the same power.
Despite its' faults I did really like the car. It was dominated by the engine of course, which sounds great and pulls really well with a remap. You could drive 300 miles in it and still feel fresh as a daisy. Very comfy seats.

If you want to see a good C30 check out the Car Cleaning Guru's early youtube videos, a really nicely modified rebel blue facelift C30 for that Polestar vibe. I did search for one of those for a while and you just cannot find one. In fact it is hard to find any good C30 T5s full stop.

Occasionally I see a C30 on the road, but there is always bitter disappointment when you clock it has a single exhaust tailpipe and isn't a T5, because only about 1% of them picked the right engine.

Back to the Spotted example, it looks terrible, geartronic, avoid.








CarlosSainz100

647 posts

138 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
These always remind me of the Volvo 480, especially with the 2 back seats. Which is a good thing. My dad had a 480 growing up and I thought it was brilliant

wpa1975

12,417 posts

132 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
I like the C30 and came close to buying one once (not a T5), however this is the wrong colour and the auto kills it.

Skyedriver

21,083 posts

300 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
wpa1975 said:
I like the C30 and came close to buying one once (not a T5), however this is the wrong colour and the auto kills it.
Following recommendations on PH we were considering a C30 (NOT T5) for young son (17) to learn in/drive when passed test. Whole subject of driving been sidelined while exams get in the way. Apparently the lesser models are cheap to run/insure.

smithyithy

7,718 posts

136 months

Tuesday 13th June 2023
quotequote all
I like the idea of having a mildly tuned T5 engine in a base-trim C30, make a quirky little sleeper. That said I do think these look good in R-Design trim