Being sued for damages, asset exposure
Being sued for damages, asset exposure
Author
Discussion

B9

Original Poster:

532 posts

119 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
Hypothetically of course

Friend owns a (mortgaged) home 50/50 with their (unmarried) partner and kids. Partner works part time and can’t afford mortgage on her own.

Friend is aware that he might be sued by a company, damages could be in the hundreds of thousands. Copyright infringement, though odd because he’s never sold, shared, publicised etc - it’s the equivalent of taking a screenshot of something online, printing it for yourself, and hanging it in your front room.

Presumably if they somehow won damages, creditors can force the sale of the house but there will be some protections around it being a family home. He’ll lose his equity which is understandable. Presumably they can’t take more than half?

Further, is his pension protected? He’s well below pension age. Could he dump savings etc into his pension today to limit possible losses?

If he can’t pay the damages, I’m guessing bankruptcy is the typical process. Again, are pensions typically protected?

I’m guessing gifts would be considered suspicious but he might fancy a blow out holiday

Goes without saying he’ll take proper advice, but wondered whether there are steps he could take today before any litigation (should there be any). If he drained his savings and dumped into pension he wouldn’t be upset about it if there was no litigation

Edited by B9 on Friday 23 June 09:37

Simpo Two

91,616 posts

289 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
A cousin of mine was concerned about something similar and set up a Trust which was apparently going to protect everything.

I know nothing about Trusts but it might be an avenue worth looking at.

Or marry his partner and give it all to her? Force majeure...!

Countdown

47,804 posts

220 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
In terms of the house they can get a charging order placed on the house. They can try and force a sale but the Judge would look into all the circumstances.

Some useful info on link below

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/a...

DaveA8

699 posts

105 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
It depends on how aggressive the person suing is and how much is at stake.
Giving assets away which wouldn't be protected by a court again comes down to have aggressively one is being pursued but I imagine the courts aren't overly sympathetic.
I was suing a very large company through my business and had a strong case, they made a reasonable offer to settle but not the full amount. They then said if we couldn't settle they'd apply for security of costs and since my business is not very big, either money deposited in court or me personally guarantee their costs of £100 to £130K.
I took the offer and moved on.
If it's hypothetical that's fine but if there is a real issue, tread very carefully as costs just seem cascade.
In my case the other side ran up over £28k and as far as I could see this was for some advice and letters, a licence to print money

Mr Whippy

32,347 posts

265 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
Doesn’t copyright infringement have to be based on the damages/loss?

If no one even knows then how does the holder of the copyright even know?


Does this involve 3D printers and a YouTube channel?

Rufus Stone

12,286 posts

80 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
B9 said:
Hypothetically of course

Friend owns a (mortgaged) home 50/50 with their (unmarried) partner and kids. Partner works part time and can’t afford mortgage on her own.

Friend is aware that he might be sued by a company, damages could be in the hundreds of thousands. Copyright infringement, though odd because he’s never sold, shared, publicised etc - it’s the equivalent of taking a screenshot of something online, printing it for yourself, and hanging it in your front room.

Presumably if they somehow won damages, creditors can force the sale of the house but there will be some protections around it being a family home. He’ll lose his equity which is understandable. Presumably they can’t take more than half?

Further, is his pension protected? He’s well below pension age. Could he dump savings etc into his pension today to limit possible losses?

If he can’t pay the damages, I’m guessing bankruptcy is the typical process. Again, are pensions typically protected?

I’m guessing gifts would be considered suspicious but he might fancy a blow out holiday

Goes without saying he’ll take proper advice, but wondered whether there are steps he could take today before any litigation (should there be any). If he drained his savings and dumped into pension he wouldn’t be upset about it if there was no litigation

Edited by B9 on Friday 23 June 09:37
What damage has the copyright holder suffered?

Terminator X

19,788 posts

228 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
Rufus Stone said:
B9 said:
Hypothetically of course

Friend owns a (mortgaged) home 50/50 with their (unmarried) partner and kids. Partner works part time and can’t afford mortgage on her own.

Friend is aware that he might be sued by a company, damages could be in the hundreds of thousands. Copyright infringement, though odd because he’s never sold, shared, publicised etc - it’s the equivalent of taking a screenshot of something online, printing it for yourself, and hanging it in your front room.

Presumably if they somehow won damages, creditors can force the sale of the house but there will be some protections around it being a family home. He’ll lose his equity which is understandable. Presumably they can’t take more than half?

Further, is his pension protected? He’s well below pension age. Could he dump savings etc into his pension today to limit possible losses?

If he can’t pay the damages, I’m guessing bankruptcy is the typical process. Again, are pensions typically protected?

I’m guessing gifts would be considered suspicious but he might fancy a blow out holiday

Goes without saying he’ll take proper advice, but wondered whether there are steps he could take today before any litigation (should there be any). If he drained his savings and dumped into pension he wouldn’t be upset about it if there was no litigation

Edited by B9 on Friday 23 June 09:37
What damage has the copyright holder suffered?
And they have to prove it.

TX.

B9

Original Poster:

532 posts

119 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
Genuinely no damages that I can imagine.

It’s absolutely not publicised or shared anywhere.

My view is that it’s very very unlikely that they’d win, and it’s perhaps just posturing to tell him to not do it again (or prevent him from thinking that he could perhaps do it for someone else), but they are renowned for claiming damages for anything and everything.

He’s now engaged with a law firm to defend but expects that alone to cost a few grand to simply reply

Mr Whippy

32,347 posts

265 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
I’m baffled.

Glad they’re seeking advice.

I’m still confused how they know if it’s for personal/private use.
How can they even have evidence?

gotoPzero

20,115 posts

213 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
Sounds like there is more to this story. Is he telling you the full story?

Simpo Two

91,616 posts

289 months

Friday 23rd June 2023
quotequote all
gotoPzero said:
Sounds like there is more to this story. Is he telling you the full story?
You're right.

wiffmaster

2,617 posts

222 months

Saturday 24th June 2023
quotequote all
B9 said:
but they are renowned for claiming damages for anything and everything.
Disney or Ferrari? wink

pork911

7,365 posts

207 months

Saturday 24th June 2023
quotequote all
B9 said:
Copyright infringement, though odd because he’s never sold, shared, publicised etc - it’s the equivalent of taking a screenshot of something online, printing it for yourself, and hanging it in your front room.
It perhaps appears you may be over reacting, or it's very far from equivalent. What has really happened for you, sorry your friend, to be so fearful for all cash, house and pension etc?