RE: Behold the (road-legal) Tamiya Wild One MAX
RE: Behold the (road-legal) Tamiya Wild One MAX
Monday 10th July 2023

Behold the (road-legal) Tamiya Wild One MAX

Full-size R/C homage goes on sale this Thursday and will be publicly unveiled at Goodwood


Thanks to delays and revisions, the Tamiya Wild One MAX has been more than two years in the making. But it appears to have been well worth the wait. The Little Car Company released many of the technical details last month - but now it has revealed the final look of its two-seat EV, and it’s fair to say that it lives up to its billing as a grown-up (in every sense) version of the Tamiya Wild One radio-controlled car. 

That includes the price, which starts at £35,000 excluding VAT and delivery. Plainly that elevates it to the status of a very senior toy indeed (for a few thousand pounds more, you can start thinking seriously about an Ariel Nomad) but it doesn’t detract from what its maker has achieved nor from the inherent coolness of the project. After all, who as a child didn’t want to shrink down small enough to drive their Tamiya Wild One? The Little Car Company is betting no one - or at least enough to sign on its dotted line. 

Road-legal status, it seems, was deemed an important part of convincing people they should do so. And the manufacturer has confirmed that with the addition of an optional ‘Road Pack’ (featuring a windscreen, wipers, mirrors, mudguards, front and rear lights, indicators and numberplates) the Wild One MAX can be driven on UK roads under the L7e classification used for quadricycles. It qualifies for this status because without its eight swappable battery packs, it weighs less than 450kg. 

With all 14.4kWh of battery capacity in place, LCC reckons its dinky EV will be good for as much as 124 miles of range on smooth roads, and around half that if you’re off the beaten track. Power is said to peak at 38hp, although that’s reckoned to be good enough for a 62mph top speed. No word on acceleration yet, but you can be sure it likely feels quicker than whatever it is on paper. And with Cobra bucket seats, a five-inch screen with marine-grade switches, Brembo disc brakes and adjustable Bilstein dampers paired with Eibach springs, hopefully it feels more generally like we all imagined a Tamiya Wild One would, too. If you’re already convinced of that, orders can be placed from midnight on Thursday 13th, with the first 100 customers getting an uprated ‘Launch Edition’ model. Good luck! 


Author
Discussion

Water Fairy

Original Poster:

6,608 posts

185 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
It was all going so well until I read the power output

And I think you'll find a Nomad is more than 'just a few thousand more'

Pebbles167

4,584 posts

182 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
38bhp, so 1bhp less than a Honda CRF250R.

I'll pass. Until it has more power at least, as the concept is awesome. (Not that I can ever afford it anyway, I'm a broke commoner)

Hammersia

1,564 posts

45 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
I'm confused in a meta type way.

Electric cos, the RC buggy was electric.

But IC would be better and cheaper.

But then it would be a buggy buggy.

Like the original original.

And if the original original was any good, we'd all be driving them already.

Electric it is then.

LunarOne

7,321 posts

167 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
Pebbles167 said:
38bhp, so 1bhp less than a Honda CRF250R.

I'll pass. Until it has more power at least, as the concept is awesome. (Not that I can ever afford it anyway, I'm a broke commoner)
Surely you just put a 540 TechniGold motor in it and an uprated battery pack and you're good to go? Oh, and swap the wheel bearing bushes for proper bearings. And add on a metal plate on the bottom to reinforce the spot at the front of the tub where it always cracks. Or at least it did on my Falcon.

mac96

6,507 posts

173 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
Surely it will need mudguards to be road legal. Which would make it look rather odd!

stavr0ss

269 posts

158 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
I look at this and I think ‘great, low weight, high involvement, no silly power numbers or massive battery to play on paper too trumps with, something genuinely unique which I’d love to own’
And then I hear Andrew frankel saying ‘what are you going to use it for?’
And I think, well I can’t drive it to an off roading location because it doesn’t have the range, it’s too wide to drive into a lwb transit so I’d have to get a trailer or a Luton van to take it anywhere interesting, so I suppose I’ll just use it to drive up and down hahas on my country estate, and then I remember that I am not, in fact, the Duke of Richmond and go back to using my battered old 996 for absolutely everything.

Lada niva, anyone?

sjg

7,677 posts

295 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
mac96 said:
Surely it will need mudguards to be road legal. Which would make it look rather odd!
It's the slightly silly thing of needing them to pass the IVA test, but once that's out the way you just have the less stringent MOT. And if it's not a testable item it can't fail it.

The Tipo 184 kit car can't get through IVA looking anything like the promo pics, they have a video showing all the things you need to fit or cover with foam to get it through https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8RqYrOkszA

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

186 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
Pebbles167 said:
38bhp, so 1bhp less than a Honda CRF250R.

I'll pass. Until it has more power at least, as the concept is awesome. (Not that I can ever afford it anyway, I'm a broke commoner)
Compare the torque though. A CRF250R has almost none.

This has 120Nm. The CRF has 24Nm. That will make the driving experience very different.




andyj007

459 posts

208 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
er werent the initial release info quotating 6k ?


Pusikurac

121 posts

70 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
35k+tax?
Need I be the one, to say it?

MightyBadger

4,655 posts

80 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
andyj007 said:
er werent the initial release info quotating 6k ?
No

Krikkit

27,938 posts

211 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
andyj007 said:
er werent the initial release info quotating 6k ?
Not unless they did it in 1975

kambites

71,505 posts

251 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
andyj007 said:
er werent the initial release info quotating 6k ?
Well sort of, but the original concept was a very different sort of vehicle. Originally it was going to have a top speed of 25 mph and a range of about 25 miles; this thing now has a top speed of 60mph and a three-figure range.

I still struggle to see the value at £35k, but saying it was meant to be £6k is rather misleading.

Bazooka Joe

61 posts

149 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
Not only is this a surefire way to instantly become the envy of Gen Xers and millennials alike, it's also surprisingly attainable, with an anticipated price of £6,000, plus taxes. With VAT, that makes it almost exactly the same money as a new Dacia Sandero, and while the Wild One doesn't have a roof, doors, windscreen or, er, a passenger seat, the 'real' car can't compete with the coolness of the Tamiya. Sure, there's nowhere to put your shopping, but there's a spaceframe chassis, four-wheel coilover suspension and 15-inch wheels wrapped in off-road tyres. There's an aerial and stickers, and even a mock up of a box for the kit to be transported in...

From a forum called Pistonheads

mac96

6,507 posts

173 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
sjg said:
mac96 said:
Surely it will need mudguards to be road legal. Which would make it look rather odd!
It's the slightly silly thing of needing them to pass the IVA test, but once that's out the way you just have the less stringent MOT. And if it's not a testable item it can't fail it.

The Tipo 184 kit car can't get through IVA looking anything like the promo pics, they have a video showing all the things you need to fit or cover with foam to get it through https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8RqYrOkszA
Fascinating video, thank you! I didn't realise a car didn't have to stay compliant with IVA after the test. Seems weird that it will pass a test with temporary changes that the tester knows will be removed that afternoon, but certainly handy that that is so.

robertdon777

180 posts

93 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
Staying true to the original...Slow. It was never a fast RC car so why are people wanting a mega powered one.

jontysafe

2,370 posts

208 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
I think we have a kitchen blender with more power.

Edt to add. Also Come back UVA fugitive, all is forgiven

Kermit74

85 posts

130 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
Behold

markh1

2,846 posts

239 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
I have a deposit down on one of these on the basis of it being circa £13k so I was rather disappointed when I read this morning that it was going to be nearly 3 times that. Email sent requesting my deposit back!

RB Will

10,860 posts

270 months

Monday 10th July 2023
quotequote all
mac96 said:
Surely it will need mudguards to be road legal. Which would make it look rather odd!
Would like to see pics of the road legal version