RE: 2023 Mercedes-AMG SL43 | PH Review
RE: 2023 Mercedes-AMG SL43 | PH Review
Tuesday 22nd August 2023

2023 Mercedes-AMG SL43 | PH Review

Half the engine of any other R232 SL - is it half as good?


Even in a world familiar with the concept of downsizing, a 2.0-litre Mercedes SL seems really strange. As recently as 2019, an SL63 had a 5.5-litre, twin-turbo V8 in it, as the old R231 generation never adopted the 4.0-litre hot-v. There’s a 2017 SL65 in the classifieds complete with a 6.0-litre V12 in it. Life comes at you fast, so they say, and never more so than for AMG Mercedes Benzes.

Still, if there’s a four-cylinder engine to kick an SL range off with, there aren’t many better than AMG’s M139. Yep, here it is again, narrowly missing out on top spot to the Lotus Emira in the competition of ‘places you didn’t expect to see an A45 engine’. It’s a different version, too, mounted longitudinally in the SL and with the 382hp output offered in other markets as a non-S A45 hatch. This has the electrified turbo not seen elsewhere, with a starter generator helping out with a few horsepower and aiming to eliminate lag by spooling the ‘charger before the exhaust gases can. As is the modern AMG tradition, the SL43 is a complex performance car.

Notably, however, it goes without a good chunk of the kit seen in the V8 models, including the four-wheel drive and rear axle steering, officially saving 160kg over an SL55. So much of it will be over the front wheels, too, and the impact is immediately obvious. The spry, energetic agility that characterises the V8 has carried over intact, even with half the steering wheels - perhaps there’s something to be said for this small engined sports car thing. 

Indeed, it doesn’t take long behind the wheel of the SL43 to wonder why AMG couldn’t have sorted all the old drop-top hot rods this well. Such is the urgency, precision and keenness of this platform that it soon gives the impression of a small, sporty SLK for the 2020s, banishing any lingering memories of lumbering Sport Leichts to the bin. Even sat back with a sizeable bonnet ahead, you soon have great confidence in the steering response, placing the big Benz between the hedgerows without a second thought. Fairly light weighting seems more appropriate for this slimline version than the full-fat V8s. It feels tight and taut in a way big Mercedes like this never have, but AMGs so often do, and that’s a good thing.

It's a shame there’s not more of an Affalterbach vibe to the engine. Inevitably some of that feel will come from the inescapable facts of physics - it’s 382hp and 354lb ft moving 1,800kg - so it’s never going to feel as feisty as a 421hp A45 or even a 360hp Emira. But also, as with the Lotus, there’s the impression that the full AMG experience is saved for the most potent version. Here the M139 doesn’t quite rev with the same reckless abandon, and while a reduction in lag from the electrified turbo is useful in terms of drivability, it does nothing for excitement. Neither do the apologetic exhaust pops of the sportier drive modes. The nine-speed auto can be indecisive, furthermore, changing down gears and holding onto them at unexpected moments. The aluminium paddles improve the situation, though you’ll search in vain for the thrill of a dual-clutch. Normally you’d not begrudge an SL that, but the slackness is notable in a car seemingly so sharp elsewhere.

So where the engine may once have been a centrepiece for an AMG SL, that’s not really the case for this SL. But then it was never intended to replace the V8s - it’s taking the place of the old V6s - and for that job it’s more than amply equipped. Fast enough, more than responsive enough, subdued at a cruise and not unpleasant to listen to. And, obvious though it may sounds, this ’43 definitely still looks like an R232 SL, and that’s a very good thing. The badge might be different and the wheels an inch smaller, but it remains a really arresting roadster. And that’d still be true if not in yellow. If buying a convertible is about making an impact and making yourself look good (be that at the golf club or elsewhere), then the SL - even the 2.0-litre one - nails that brief.

It's an inescapable fact: driving the ’43 was a more than enjoyable experience. There’s great stability and composure under braking and through bends, loads of grip to lean on (and just a little bit of feel through the seat to gauge it), enough performance to be fun and a firm, reassuring brake pedal. Just as with the more senior models, in fact. Trouble is the ’43 also does exactly what the V8s do and just starts to fray at the edges when the going gets tough. Which is such a shame given how encouragingly it begins, if boding well for the GT. There’ll be a slight shudder from the structure (or squeak from the dash), maybe a thump from a wheel, some unchecked movement that undermines your faith and cools your boots a tad. Up to a point the SL43 is really good, and its threshold can be found way beyond any previous comparable Mercedes sports car, but it feels worth drawing attention to. Experience suggests that perhaps a 911 would do even better on a similar road, but it would undoubtedly be a close run thing. 

The SL43 offers up a very good account of itself in isolation; indeed it’s only when compared to those rivals (and with a spec sheet to hand) that the case begins to unravel somewhat. Because it’s a 2.0-litre car that costs £108,000. And however impressive this is as a Mercedes SL and an AMG product, that just doesn’t compute. The aforementioned Porsche cabrio range starts at similar money with a flat-six, and while cars like the Lexus LC and Jaguar F-Type can’t offer the same sort of aptitude, they’re both great looking drop-tops with stirring V8s for similar (or less) money. An M4 isn’t as pretty or as pure-bred, but it offers a heap more performance and practicality.

Which does make the SL43 somewhat of a tough sell. It can be heartily recommended to those sold on the new SL’s look inside and out, yes; a ’55 is 50 per cent more expensive again, and this does still drive well. But engines never matter more than when dealing with convertibles, and especially when spending six figures. The AMG 2.0-litre simply doesn’t sit quite as comfortably in the SL package as it does the A45 one. There are certainly some scenarios where a V8 remains the best option, if possible - make the most of them while you can.


SPECIFICATION | 2023 MERCEDES-AMG SL43

Engine: 1,991cc, four-cyl turbo, plus 48v ISG
Transmission: 9-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 382@6,750rpm
Torque (lb ft): 354@3,000-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.9 seconds
Top speed: 171mph
Weight: 1,810kg
MPG: 31.1 (WLTP)
CO2: 207g/km (WLTP)
Price: £108,165

Author
Discussion

3yardy3

Original Poster:

280 posts

144 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
I'm sorry... £110,000 For a 4 cylinder sports car?????????????????????????

GPH

755 posts

147 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Clearly the Mercedes accountants thought this was a good idea for the countries that now have very high taxes for high polluting cars but the marketing and sales people should have pointed out the error of a 4 cylinder SL that cost over £100k.
What is worse is that the new (much cheaper) CLE convertible has a new 381hp 6 cylinder option which would be perfect for the SL.

I currently own 2 Mercedes convertibles including an SL and both have 6 cylinder engines which are the perfect compromise between power and economy whilst having a lovely sound. The V8 is perfect for those after more power.
In a country like the UK or USA, where we do not have annual road tax in the thousands, I wouldn't even bother test driving this when the competition has such better sounding and smoother engines.

Also interesting to read in Car magazine that Mercedes insiders admit that the 4 cylinder C63 has bombed in the showroom and they are re-engineering it for the V8.



Edited by GPH on Monday 21st August 13:11

Roger Irrelevant

3,391 posts

143 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
3yardy3 said:
I'm sorry... £110,000 For a 4 cylinder sports car?????????????????????????
Yeah...I'd usually be one of the people commenting that the SL has never been a cheap car, that inflation-adjusted it's the same price as the ones that went before etc etc...but I really wasn't expecting that! To take two cars that came to mind as I read the article (and pedants please note I'm not saying that they're direct competitors of this SL) - you can get a new Mustang GT convertible and a new Alpine A110 for the price of this, which doesn't seem quite right.

Sport220

1,575 posts

105 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Looks great, love the colour as well. Kudos to MB for speccing a press car with some brightwork when every car manufacturer seems to be giving in to this trend of primer grey and flat whites

Shame it’s crazy expensive, don’t think they’ll be shifting much of those

pSyCoSiS

4,321 posts

235 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
No, just no. As nice as it looks, the minimum entry point for an SL should, as has always been the case, be a six cylinder.

V8, V12, all good. But, not a four cylinder in an SL! Sad times.

RDMcG

20,874 posts

237 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Very heavy and leaden-looking. Personally prefer the older cars like the R230.

J4CKO

46,897 posts

230 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
I guess the target market arent all that fixated on cylinders, if they are, they pony up and buy a V8 SL. SLs tend to be an older demographic, often ladies buy them who tend to be, in a large generalisation less fixated on such things and just enjoy it for what it is.

I wouldnt mind this, would take it over an older six with loads less power.

Numeric

1,499 posts

181 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
For me its the AMG bit that grates - if it was a regular SL I'd say it's absolutely fine - maybe SL drivers don't really care about cylinder count so long as its comfy and brisk. But to then go all AMG? Then I think you need a more special powerplant in a car like this.

But then I have to remember all the 116i with M badges all over them...

Matt_T

1,297 posts

104 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
I would hazard a guess that 50% of the customers for the SL have no knowledge or interest in whether it is a 4 cyl or V6. They are buying a beautiful car that is lovely to drive.

I wonder if the future of these kind of cars is a 3-cyl hybrid (like the BMW i8) or fully electric?

911Spanker

3,690 posts

46 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Save the planet and buy one of these.

cerb4.5lee

44,815 posts

210 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
I do like the way these look, but I'd definitely want more engine for the money than this costs though for sure.

Spiros115

434 posts

80 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Sat in one the other day, it really is a decent looking thing from the exterior but the interior is ruined with the stuck on iPad centre console, honestly it just cheapens the whole thing and as the cabin is quite compact it feels so strange to have this big hunking tablet next to your elbow.

It seems like every car company is doing digital dials and big screen, from Volvo to Tesla to Ford and more and that devalues it again. I was much more impressed by my mates a class with that widescreen interior, it has wow factor for £30k, this is 3.5x more expensive and isn’t a nice/resolved.

Mind you this is basically a car for Miami Beach or California so for former probably just wants to brag how expensive it is, the latter will talk about economy and tech….

Triumph Man

9,615 posts

198 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
A four cylinder SL?


paulnutter

8 posts

227 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Pretty car, hope they have improved the roof longevity.

fozzymandeus

1,103 posts

176 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
paulnutter said:
Pretty car, hope they have improved the roof longevity.
Yeah I sold my 2003 SL in 2019 without any issues with the roof.
Let’s hope they can do better than 16 years with this one.

Sean 2000

137 posts

213 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Clown planet!
Even funnier than an AMG having only 4 cylinders.... I saw an AMG electric EQ something or other that has NO CYLINDERS.

So if AMG were just Mercs with bigger engines, what does AMG actually represent now other than pure profiteering.


Maccmike8

1,611 posts

84 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
£110k = 4 cylinders.
Very soon £110k will = zero cylinders. Suppose we should be happy.

Yex RS4

4,611 posts

250 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Mercedes has got the pricing points of it's revised SL range so wrong it is laughable.

£108K for a 2 litre 4 pot is beyond insane money.

The price of the SL63 is a mind boggling £175K before you add options, with 2 I have seen in dealers looking for owners being over £193K.

Sales figures in the next 12 months are going to make interesting reading with interest rates as they are. A quick look on the MB site shows a fairly basic SL63 at c£176K coming in at £30,500 down, followed by 48 monthly payments at £1,800 and a final balloon of £79K rofl

bigbadbikercats

651 posts

238 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
I can’t help thinking that this might have been a more appealing package in a reborn SLK than it is in an SL…

redroadster

1,886 posts

262 months

Monday 21st August 2023
quotequote all
Big shame they went fabric roof ,the folding hardtop far better at staying clean compared to fabric ,it's a no from me .