SS brake lines, are they still beneficial?
Discussion
I assume you mean braided flexi lines.
If so have a look at this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LJiPDAr9f8
In summary you are probably best off with new or at least in good condition 'rubber' lines.
Lots of people swear by braided lines but a lot of it is placebo.
If so have a look at this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LJiPDAr9f8
In summary you are probably best off with new or at least in good condition 'rubber' lines.
Lots of people swear by braided lines but a lot of it is placebo.
I've run S/S lines on several cars, as long as they're proper ones specifically made for the car that fit as they should then they'll firm up brake pedal feel a bit, but you'll only really notice when breaking hard not day-to-day.
Other than that there's not much wrong with the stock rubber ones. They do look nice if you're going for a presentation.
Other than that there's not much wrong with the stock rubber ones. They do look nice if you're going for a presentation.
TEKNOPUG said:
SS shouldn't degrade over time, whereas rubber will. So they are fit and forget if you plan on keeping the car for years.
If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
I have to disagree, NOTHING that is safety critical is 'fit and forget'! If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
They should be regularly (ie at least annually) inspected for fretting and fracture of the braid, especially near the unions. Part of the issue is that folk often don't fit and bracket them with sufficient consideration of the differences to the rubber hoses they've removed, not least their smaller diameter and their relative inflexibility.
TwinKam said:
TEKNOPUG said:
SS shouldn't degrade over time, whereas rubber will. So they are fit and forget if you plan on keeping the car for years.
If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
I have to disagree, NOTHING that is safety critical is 'fit and forget'! If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
They should be regularly (ie at least annually) inspected for fretting and fracture of the braid, especially near the unions. Part of the issue is that folk often don't fit and bracket them with sufficient consideration of the differences to the rubber hoses they've removed, not least their smaller diameter and their relative inflexibility.
TwinKam said:
I have to disagree, NOTHING that is safety critical is 'fit and forget'!
They should be regularly (ie at least annually) inspected for fretting and fracture of the braid, especially near the unions. Part of the issue is that folk often don't fit and bracket them with sufficient consideration of the differences to the rubber hoses they've removed, not least their smaller diameter and their relative inflexibility.
Every part should be regularly inspected.....the point being that the stiffness of rubber hoses will degrade over time and should be considered a consumable part. They should be regularly (ie at least annually) inspected for fretting and fracture of the braid, especially near the unions. Part of the issue is that folk often don't fit and bracket them with sufficient consideration of the differences to the rubber hoses they've removed, not least their smaller diameter and their relative inflexibility.
Whereas SS hoses won't degrade at anything like the rate and their performance will remain the same for years. Certainly longer than most people typically keep a car.
YMMV
TEKNOPUG said:
SS shouldn't degrade over time, whereas rubber will. So they are fit and forget if you plan on keeping the car for years.
If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
You do know they are rubber lines with a ss braiding over them them just like household Flexi pipeIf you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
Chris32345 said:
TEKNOPUG said:
SS shouldn't degrade over time, whereas rubber will. So they are fit and forget if you plan on keeping the car for years.
If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
You do know they are rubber lines with a ss braiding over them them just like household Flexi pipeIf you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
Chris32345 said:
TEKNOPUG said:
SS shouldn't degrade over time, whereas rubber will. So they are fit and forget if you plan on keeping the car for years.
If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
You do know they are rubber lines with a ss braiding over them them just like household Flexi pipeIf you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
TEKNOPUG said:
Chris32345 said:
TEKNOPUG said:
SS shouldn't degrade over time, whereas rubber will. So they are fit and forget if you plan on keeping the car for years.
If you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
You do know they are rubber lines with a ss braiding over them them just like household Flexi pipeIf you renew the rubber hoses every time you replace the brakes, you are unlikely to notice any performance difference.
Chris32345 said:
E-bmw said:
No, they are generally nylon lines.
Same difference both a flexible tube makes little difference to the fact the metals does not hold the fluidGassing Station | Home Mechanics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


