Possible dodgy MOT
Author
Discussion

pigface1000

Original Poster:

80 posts

80 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
Son buys a near mint low miles Focus ST 225 (10 plate) in Jan 23

Was MOTed from November 22 by supplying car dealer. (this is a long standing well regarded dealer)

He puts car into MOT and it fails on having No Cat and obviously emmssions, everything else was fine.

MOT tester said that pipe has been on for well over 12 months and previous tester should have failed it on having no cat.

Does my son have any recorse on the supplying dealer or is this a suck it up and take the hit of getting a cat fitted.

PS The dealer has ramps as he fitted new discs to the car when he purchased it. so cant use the did nreasise the cat was missing.

E-bmw

12,069 posts

174 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
Just because the tester missed something that may look obvious to others doesn't make the MOT "dodgy".

Having said that, if they did the MOT then 100% yes, go to them & without getting all shouty just say that this has come to light & that you would like it to be put right as they should have seen it.

GasEngineer

2,075 posts

84 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
OP said possibly dodgy.

There have been tales of MOT testers "turning a blind eye" to obvious fail items, including number plates, and you can't get more obvious that that.

ARHarh

4,892 posts

129 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
How could the tester possibly tell the pipe had been on for more than a year and not 11 months and 15 days?

And having any comeback after a year is not really going to be easy.

48k

16,129 posts

170 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
Latest MoT tester has precisely zero way of knowing how long that pipe has been on for.

Previous MoT tester has legal documentation showing a pass recorded including an emissions test.

11 months have passed between the two tests.

No chance of any recourse IMHO, one to suck up.

pigface1000

Original Poster:

80 posts

80 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
I think you are all right.

Suck it up and stick a cat back on.

Thanks for the replys

blue_haddock

4,801 posts

89 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
After a year you have zero recourse for the MOT

QBee

22,049 posts

166 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
My impression of the MOT test is that 10 years ago a lot of dodgy behaviour went on, but in 2022/23 that has pretty much all been stopped due to better use of technology and loss off livelihood/criminal prosecution if caught.

They now won't cheat the emissions test even for mates who own the garage across the road and give them 10-20 MOTs a month to process.

poo at Paul's

14,538 posts

197 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
pigface1000 said:
Son buys a near mint low miles Focus ST 225 (10 plate) in Jan 23

Was MOTed from November 22 by supplying car dealer. (this is a long standing well regarded dealer)

He puts car into MOT and it fails on having No Cat and obviously emmssions, everything else was fine.

MOT tester said that pipe has been on for well over 12 months and previous tester should have failed it on having no cat.

Does my son have any recorse on the supplying dealer or is this a suck it up and take the hit of getting a cat fitted.

PS The dealer has ramps as he fitted new discs to the car when he purchased it. so cant use the did nreasise the cat was missing.
Sounds like the 2nd MOT tester has removed the stock standard cat and fitted a dodgy decat on it then failed it. Likely they have a customer or staff member that needs a stock cat.
Its as likely as the supplying dealer getting it dodgily through an MOT last year.

Or did you lad know it was decatted previously? Maybe he had it decatted, not told you, and is not reaping the consequences?

sixor8

7,632 posts

290 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
It wouldn't be the first time a de-catted car has passed the MoT. It happens quite frequently, especially when you have to maintain an old TVR / (insert expensive cat car here), they are known as 'friendly' garages. wink

It isn't what I'd call 'dodgy,' that would be a car that passes with serious faults that made the car dangerous. I bought a car 3 years ago that had an MoT with no advisories but on closer examination, many of the brake hose ferrules were extremely rusty, and some of the bushes obviously very worn. But it had received a 'clean' MoT to look good for sale when it should have at least had several advisories. frown

If that was the only fail point, I can understand you annoyance but could be worse! Are 2nd hand cats available or have they been all scrapped for the 'precious' metals (Gollum smilie???)

sixor8

7,632 posts

290 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
QBee said:
My impression of the MOT test is that 10 years ago a lot of dodgy behaviour went on, but in 2022/23 that has pretty much all been stopped due to better use of technology and loss off livelihood/criminal prosecution if caught.

They now won't cheat the emissions test even for mates who own the garage across the road and give them 10-20 MOTs a month to process.
With a TVR, you protesteth too much, methinks. smile Sounds like you've been let down, or do you not know anywhere that does any more?

w8pmc

3,385 posts

260 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
Is also possible under certain conditions that it could pass at one Garage & not at another.

Had a de-cat zorst on my previous Mk7.5 Golf R & it's first MOT was a fail due to emissions, however the tester suggested rebooking immediately & take the car for a very spirited drive & bring it back warm/hot for testing. Hey presto with this being the case, the emissions test passed (just).

pigface1000

Original Poster:

80 posts

80 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
Sounds like the 2nd MOT tester has removed the stock standard cat and fitted a dodgy decat on it then failed it. Likely they have a customer or staff member that needs a stock cat.
Its as likely as the supplying dealer getting it dodgily through an MOT last year.

Or did you lad know it was decatted previously? Maybe he had it decatted, not told you, and is not reaping the consequences?
Son was at MOT station, nothing has been taken off. He was shown it missing. Also he has not done anything to car. He is not that dumb to do it and not put one back on for the MOT.

MustangGT

13,639 posts

302 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
The MoT from last year should include the emissions test data. What does it say?

QBee

22,049 posts

166 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
sixor8 said:
QBee said:
My impression of the MOT test is that 10 years ago a lot of dodgy behaviour went on, but in 2022/23 that has pretty much all been stopped due to better use of technology and loss off livelihood/criminal prosecution if caught.

They now won't cheat the emissions test even for mates who own the garage across the road and give them 10-20 MOTs a month to process.
With a TVR, you protesteth too much, methinks. smile Sounds like you've been let down, or do you not know anywhere that does any more?
I was having an engine rebuild on my TVR anyway, but decided to go back to a catted normally aspirated set up from a de-catted and turbo-charged one for a whole host of reasons. One of the reasons was as I stated in my original post above, the problem of getting the decatted car through the MOT. Email me if you want to discuss further, I am happy to chat about it, but 90% is me and TVR related, so utterly irrelevant here.

Jamescrs

5,809 posts

87 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
Used to have a Focus ST and even eith a 100cel sports cat they were sometimes difficult to get through emissions.

Possible the dealer put on a standard cat for the MOT then removed it again and sold the Cat for a couple of hundred pounds but you will never prove it.

There was a guy who was a shady trader on these forums who even admitted taking original cats off cars he sold and fitting aftermarket low quality ones so he could sell the original cats for a profit.

Think that thread got deleted when people objected to it.

pigface1000

Original Poster:

80 posts

80 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
MustangGT said:
The MoT from last year should include the emissions test data. What does it say?
Not sure of he had the data sheet, will ask him later

sugerbear

6,252 posts

180 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
Your issue is with the supplying dealer not the MOT station.

You need to write them (send it signed for) giving them 14 days notice explaining the part was missing and the car was mis-sold. Give them a chance to resolve it but if they don't offer to resolve it then threaten to take them to court.
You need to get an independent inspection of the missing part.

You could initially try to speak to them but most dealers do palm you off (in my experience they will try everything to wriggle out issues because they know the majority of people persist in complaints) If it's a large dealership network there is probably a complaints procedure, I suppose you could try that route, but the chances of them palming you off are high.

andymc

7,558 posts

229 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
they will just say he he will have changed it in the last 12 months

poo at Paul's

14,538 posts

197 months

Wednesday 25th October 2023
quotequote all
pigface1000 said:
poo at Paul's said:
Sounds like the 2nd MOT tester has removed the stock standard cat and fitted a dodgy decat on it then failed it. Likely they have a customer or staff member that needs a stock cat.
Its as likely as the supplying dealer getting it dodgily through an MOT last year.

Or did you lad know it was decatted previously? Maybe he had it decatted, not told you, and is not reaping the consequences?
He is not that dumb to do it and not put one back on for the MOT.
And yet, seems to have bought a car without a cat at all? scratchchin

Why does he not take it back to the MOT place that passed it last year?

You think this is bad, wait til it blows up because of the remap...biggrin