NASA X-59 “low boom” supersonic aircraft unveiled
NASA X-59 “low boom” supersonic aircraft unveiled
Author
Discussion

dvs_dave

Original Poster:

9,040 posts

250 months

Saturday 13th January 2024
quotequote all
Exciting news in supersonic aviation. Whilst it’s been known about for a while, with various images and renderings floating around, the actual aircraft has been officially unveiled at the Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks. Designed to go Mach 1.4 with a sonic boom like “a car door closing”, it’s potentially a real game changer for commercial aviation. No windscreen so fly by cctv is an interesting feature.

Skip to 20:30 for the actual unveiling.



Edited by dvs_dave on Saturday 13th January 17:41

Cold

16,497 posts

115 months

Saturday 13th January 2024
quotequote all
Good to see the Americans are no longer frightened of supersonic commercial flight.

rodericb

8,667 posts

151 months

Saturday 13th January 2024
quotequote all
Cold said:
Good to see the Americans are no longer frightened of supersonic commercial flight.
Okay ummm, righto then....

dvs_dave

Original Poster:

9,040 posts

250 months

Saturday 13th January 2024
quotequote all
Cold said:
Good to see the Americans are no longer frightened of supersonic commercial flight.
Britain isn’t what it once was either. Especially in this field.

Roger Irrelevant

3,349 posts

138 months

Saturday 13th January 2024
quotequote all
Absolutely love this - I recently read 'Skunk Works' by Ben Rich (ex-head of Lockheed Martin's special projects division), which really piqued my interest in experimental aircraft. Good to see they're still at it!

hidetheelephants

34,463 posts

218 months

Saturday 13th January 2024
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Exciting news in supersonic aviation. Whilst it’s been known about for a while, with various images and renderings floating around, the actual aircraft has been officially unveiled at the Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks. Designed to go Mach 1.4 with a sonic boom like “a car door closing”, it’s potentially a real game changer for commercial aviation. No windscreen so fly by cctv is an interesting feature.

Skip to 20:30 for the actual unveiling.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/live/z0CTvQrGFY0?si=SGok78TiuVspxOac[/youtube]

Direct link in case YouTube embed isn’t working.
https://www.youtube.com/live/z0CTvQrGFY0?si=SGok78...
Scroll forward to 21 minutes if you want to skip the blather. I think they skimped on the dry ice budget. hehe



Edited by hidetheelephants on Saturday 13th January 17:27

FourWheelDrift

92,038 posts

309 months

Thursday 17th July 2025
quotequote all
NASA s X-59 Quiet Supersonic Aircraft Begins Taxi Tests



It's the love child of the Handley Page 115 and the Fairey Delta 2.

Edited by FourWheelDrift on Thursday 17th July 20:35

bergclimber34

3,109 posts

18 months

Friday 18th July 2025
quotequote all
Looks like a 16 exhaust nozzle?

havoc

32,951 posts

260 months

Monday 21st July 2025
quotequote all
If someone hasn't nicknamed this plane yet they're missing a golden opportunity:- biggrin



(Start at 3:47 if it doesn't automatically take you there)

cb31

1,396 posts

161 months

Monday 21st July 2025
quotequote all
It's no looker is it?

JoshSm

4,020 posts

62 months

Monday 21st July 2025
quotequote all
cb31 said:
It's no looker is it?
That was my first thought too, form following function but it's still not what you'd call aesthetically pleasing.

A full scale production version would likely be a bit better proportioned.

Buzz84

1,561 posts

174 months

Monday 21st July 2025
quotequote all
bergclimber34 said:
Looks like a 16 exhaust nozzle?
I read it somewhere that they have designed it to use as much "off the shelf" components as possible to reduce the complexity and development time.
Landing gear, avionics, engine etc I can't recall what came from what off the top of my head.

bobthemonkey

4,184 posts

241 months

Monday 21st July 2025
quotequote all
Buzz84 said:
I read it somewhere that they have designed it to use as much "off the shelf" components as possible to reduce the complexity and development time.
Landing gear, avionics, engine etc I can't recall what came from what off the top of my head.
It’s an F414, so presumably reusing a Super Hornet setup.

768

19,633 posts

121 months

Monday 21st July 2025
quotequote all
cb31 said:
It's no looker is it?
I thought it looked ok, then it turned side on. yikes

havoc

32,951 posts

260 months

Monday 21st July 2025
quotequote all
768 said:
cb31 said:
It's no looker is it?
I thought it looked ok, then it turned side on. yikes
laugh

Quite. Half of the plane is nose.

Russ35

2,675 posts

264 months

Tuesday 28th October 2025
quotequote all

Simpo Two

91,929 posts

290 months

Wednesday 29th October 2025
quotequote all
What's the point of it? It's not an airliner, it's more like a prototype fighter. Do they wish to avoid hurting the enemy's ears?

FourWheelDrift

92,038 posts

309 months

Wednesday 29th October 2025
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
What's the point of it? It's not an airliner, it's more like a prototype fighter. Do they wish to avoid hurting the enemy's ears?
It's a proof of concept aircraft for future supersonic airliners.

Eric Mc

125,038 posts

290 months

Wednesday 29th October 2025
quotequote all
Yes- it’s exploring ways of achieving supersonic speeds for commercial aircraft but minimising the sonic boom,

eharding

14,648 posts

309 months

Wednesday 29th October 2025
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
What's the point of it? It's not an airliner, it's more like a prototype fighter. Do they wish to avoid hurting the enemy's ears?
As the BAC 221 was to Concorde, the X-59 is hoped to be a proof of concept to the next generation of SSTs. The BAC 221 (a rebuilt Fairey Delta) was used to test Concorde's wing section, and this thing is supposed to test techniques to allow overland supersonic transits of the US without annoying everyone by dropping bangs on them.

I can very vaguely remember as a small child falling off my chair in the conservatory of the house my parents had in Truro as a result of an almighty bang from a supersonic test. Would have been 1969, maybe 1968 or early 1970.