RE: Mercedes CL65 AMG | Spotted
RE: Mercedes CL65 AMG | Spotted
Tuesday 23rd January 2024

Mercedes CL65 AMG | Spotted

V12 bargain barges won't be around forever. Better make hay while you can...


You’ve got to wonder what the future holds for V12 waft-mobiles on the used market. Already there are precious few to choose from even if you’re willing to take the financial hit on a brand new luxury-grade limo and, barring a miraculous breakthrough in synthetic fuels, they will surely all go the way of the dodo in the not-too-distant future. Boo. Conversely, while you can bag a 12-cylinder barge for what could comfortably be called peanuts these days, there's always the chance they might gain in popularity (and therefore value) once the glory days of oversized combustion engines are well and truly behind us.

For now, though, the bargain barge is still alive and kicking. That’s partly because the cost of running an old brute can be astronomical - something that buyers will perhaps be more willing to overlook if (or when) they achieve modern classic status - but it could also be down to the nature of these 12-cylinder continental cruise missiles, which is to devour many miles very quickly and very quietly. So if you prefer your V12 to go about its business without making a song a dance about it (and you’re a master at budgeting for the unexpected), then kindly draw your attention to this marvellous Mercedes CL65 AMG.

The CL65 was all about excess. If a buyer wanted a CL65 new back in 2008, by definition they assumed the 6.2-litre, 525hp twin-turbo V8 in the £111,000 CL63 simply wouldn’t fulfil their wafty needs and instead opted to fork out an additional £50,000 for four extra cylinders. That, of course, did bring a substantial leap in power to 612hp and, notably, a near-60 per cent increase in torque to 738lb ft. So torquey was the CL65 that it required Merc’s bullet-proof five-speed automatic gearbox because the newer seven-speed auto fitted to the CL63 couldn’t handle such monumental levels of twist.

Naturally, the straight-line performance was devastating. The CL65 could gallop to 62mph from a standstill in 4.4 seconds, and though it’s limited to a cruising speed of just 155mph, it’s said the gearing is good for 212mph if the limiter were removed. And you know it’d be about as frenetic as a library at those speeds. What’s more impressive is that it’s capable of delivering such an outrageous level of performance while hauling along 2.2 tonnes worth of leather, wood and cutting-edge automotive technology - by late '00s standards, anyway.

To AMG’s credit, it did try to work around the CL’s monumental weight by fitting the ’65 with marginally stiffer springs and tweaking the Active Body Control system to keep the car as close to level as possible. Obviously, it was never going to work as a Ring Taxi, but reviewers at the time were seemingly impressed with how the CL65 was able to remain composed under hard braking and cornering while retaining the CL’s pillowy ride. Said Active Body Control can be an issue on the C216 CLs, so it’s probably worth setting some pocket money aside just in case, but the M275 6.0-litre V12 shouldn’t cause you many headaches - just lots of trips to the grown-up pump. 

Believe it or not, Mercedes didn’t shift many CL65s in the UK. I couldn’t get hold of an official number for right-hand drive cars, but HowManyLeft puts it at more than 20, fewer than 30. A rare beast, then, and one that’s yet to command serious collector-level money. This 2008 car has 41,000 miles on the clock (low for a mile muncher) and, as crazy as it sounds, is ULEZ compliant. The perfect London runabout? Probably not, but there’s no denying that, at £36,995, there’s an almighty amount of V12 performance on offer for the price of a well-specced Golf. Grab it while you can. 


SPECIFICATION | MERCEDES CL65 AMG (C216)

Engine: 5,980cc V12, twin-turbo
Transmission: five-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 612@4,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 738@2,000-4,000rpm
MPG: 19
CO2: 355g/km
Year registered: 2008
Recorded mileage: 41,000
Price new: £160,000
Yours for: £36,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

yme402

Original Poster:

656 posts

132 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Get a proper AMG while you can. Now that they seem to be powered by 2.0 4cyl engines, they are little more than a marketing exercise.

Xenoous

2,445 posts

88 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Classy looking car. A wonderful thing to waft about in, if you can afford it!

whp1983

1,380 posts

169 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Awesome but the starting price is almost irrelevant…. It could properly pull your pants down at any time.

Wood inside is hideous- that needs to go.

mainaman

428 posts

215 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
CGT/Flying Spurs MK1 and the CL63/S63 with the great 6.2 V8 are much cheaper and DB9/Rapide are available for the same money or less, so i don’t see any VFM or bargain here, only rarity. A much newer XJR would be another better looking, sounding and driving alternative.

Edited by mainaman on Tuesday 23 January 07:18


Edited by mainaman on Tuesday 23 January 07:18

Chubbyross

4,983 posts

115 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
whp1983 said:
Awesome but the starting price is almost irrelevant…. It could properly pull your pants down at any time.

Wood inside is hideous- that needs to go.
Agree on the wood. It looks fresh from the outside but that interior dates it horrendously.

Robertb

3,855 posts

268 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
It’s in Aberdeen. It would cost me around £200 in fuel to drive it home.

An economy class rail ticket to get there is £243.

It’s cheaper to travel in a twin turbo V12 Mercedes than take a train.

soad

34,663 posts

206 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Robertb said:
It’s in Aberdeen. It would cost me around £200 in fuel to drive it home.

An economy class rail ticket to get there is £243.

It’s cheaper to travel in a twin turbo V12 Mercedes than take a train.
Man Maths at work. wink

J4CKO

46,839 posts

230 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Robertb said:
It’s in Aberdeen. It would cost me around £200 in fuel to drive it home.

An economy class rail ticket to get there is £243.

It’s cheaper to travel in a twin turbo V12 Mercedes than take a train.
And less risky to stick your head out of the train window !

I cant see it selling for anywhere near that, do these have a following or is it just another ageing Merc with a big engine ?

It sits well into the gap between very wealthy first owner(s) and those who want something nice cheaply, and 37 grand doesnt fit in either camp, and I dont think there is much in between for these.

It looks good, and is rare but it also looks quite like 6 grands worth of CL500, its massively complex and has a V12 with turbos, its ten grand plus more than a similar age/mileage Conti GT and is stuff like this selling anyway ?



Kerniki

2,903 posts

51 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
This cars champion will be along shortly biggrin

They are good apart from the damn rover reminder

NJJ

527 posts

110 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Sacrilegious to say on here I grant you, but in a world of turbine smooth, silent EVs I no longer see the point in a V12 barge like this. What is the value-add over an EV power train, ignoring the PITA need to recharge etc ? Cost a fortune to run with the ability to break wallets and marriages. However, if we're taking about a Ferrari, Lamborghini, Pagani (credit to AMG) or NA Aston Martin V12 then totally different story! Some V12 installations are just more special than others.

Edited by NJJ on Tuesday 23 January 08:55

DaveCWK

2,409 posts

204 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Robertb said:
It’s in Aberdeen. It would cost me around £200 in fuel to drive it home.

An economy class rail ticket to get there is £243.

It’s cheaper to travel in a twin turbo V12 Mercedes than take a train.
I like hehe

Robertb

3,855 posts

268 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
NJJ said:
Sacrilegious to say on here I grant you, but in a world of turbine smooth, silent EVs I no longer see the point in a V12 barge like this. What is the value-add over an EV power train, ignoring the PITA need to recharge etc ? Cost a fortune to run with the ability to break wallets and marriages. However, if we're taking about a Ferrari, Lamborghini, Pagani (credit to AMG) or NA Aston Martin V12 then totally different story! Some V12 installations are just more special than others.

Edited by NJJ on Tuesday 23 January 08:55
There is not so far an EV equivalent of a luxury GT coupe. Taycan is closest, but not for £36k, yet.

Anyhow. Listen to this start up, tell me you still want that EV…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0wHeCm0iP74&pp=y...

pb8g09

3,229 posts

99 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
This looks epic to my eyes, I'd even settle with the wood interior.

It's a bit of a relic even in today's world, let alone the future though. Like having a fine grand piano in your hallway when a keyboard can do twice the job but without looking anywhere near as awesome.

_Rodders_

4,370 posts

49 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Robertb said:
NJJ said:
Sacrilegious to say on here I grant you, but in a world of turbine smooth, silent EVs I no longer see the point in a V12 barge like this. What is the value-add over an EV power train, ignoring the PITA need to recharge etc ? Cost a fortune to run with the ability to break wallets and marriages. However, if we're taking about a Ferrari, Lamborghini, Pagani (credit to AMG) or NA Aston Martin V12 then totally different story! Some V12 installations are just more special than others.

Edited by NJJ on Tuesday 23 January 08:55
There is not so far an EV equivalent of a luxury GT coupe. Taycan is closest, but not for £36k, yet.

Anyhow. Listen to this start up, tell me you still want that EV…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0wHeCm0iP74&pp=y...
Rolls Royce would disagree.

_Rodders_

4,370 posts

49 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
NJJ said:
Sacrilegious to say on here I grant you, but in a world of turbine smooth, silent EVs I no longer see the point in a V12 barge like this. What is the value-add over an EV power train, ignoring the PITA need to recharge etc ? Cost a fortune to run with the ability to break wallets and marriages. However, if we're taking about a Ferrari, Lamborghini, Pagani (credit to AMG) or NA Aston Martin V12 then totally different story! Some V12 installations are just more special than others.

Edited by NJJ on Tuesday 23 January 08:55
I've said the same thing. V12's when used for their refinement characteristics have been usurped.

You have to be idiosyncratic enough to actually want 12 cylinders just for the sake if it. Nothing wrong with that at all but it must thin the pool of potential buyers even further.

fortfive

201 posts

89 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
DaveCWK said:
I like hehe
Me too, but having had an SL from Aberdeen watch out for rust.

Cryssys

925 posts

68 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
19 MPG sounds hopelessly optimistic.

Maybe if your very, very light footed and only drive on motorways in the middle of the night.

irish boy

3,913 posts

266 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
I drove one of these once. The nature of the engine and how much torque it has/special it feels can’t be conveyed in print. It was fabulous and very different from the models below. Which again I didn’t appreciate before driving it.

FlukePlay

1,193 posts

175 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
DaveCWK said:
Robertb said:
It’s in Aberdeen. It would cost me around £200 in fuel to drive it home.

An economy class rail ticket to get there is £243.

It’s cheaper to travel in a twin turbo V12 Mercedes than take a train.
I like hehe
Especially when you're 4 up in the car and not the only occupant, then you're absolutely quids in and enjoying the journey in style. With the savings made you can all enjoy a gastropub meal on the way back. Nice!

Master Bean

5,222 posts

150 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2024
quotequote all
Article said:
by definition they assumed the 6.2-litre, 525hp twin-turbo V8
The 6.2 was naturally aspirated.