Compact v IPhone 15 pro

Author
Discussion

Busa mav

Original Poster:

2,563 posts

155 months

Sunday 28th January
quotequote all
I am off to South Africa in a few weeks time , some travelling around then a week staying in a safari lodge n the Kruger Park , with 2 drives a day.

Will an iPhone 15pro do a good job for tourist photos, or would a compact ( up to £800) make a huge different to the photos I can take ?

Any advice / suggestions very welcome

Bungleaio

6,339 posts

203 months

Sunday 28th January
quotequote all
Going on a safari and only taking a phone seems like a huge missed opportunity. A proper camera with a zoom will be so much better.

DibblyDobbler

11,277 posts

198 months

Sunday 28th January
quotequote all
If you want any half decent shots of animals (without getting a few feet away!) I'd take a 'proper' camera - I have a Sony RX10iv (the RX10iii would also work well) which gives 600mm equivalent zoom and gives great results in good light. You could pick up a very lightly used one for your budget - I can share sample shots if you're interested smile

flight147z

981 posts

130 months

Sunday 28th January
quotequote all
You really need an SLR with a long lens to get decent safari pics - you won't get the range with a phone - my efforts from Kenya below!






covmutley

3,039 posts

191 months

Monday 29th January
quotequote all
Maybe look to hire a camera?

Busa mav

Original Poster:

2,563 posts

155 months

Monday 29th January
quotequote all
Thanks guys, I have had a decent camera set up, up to 5 years ago when I sold it all.
I just wasn’t using it due to the hassle of lugging it around , so just wanted to explore the options of a compact.
If I started buying decent camera gear again I think my 48 year marriage wouldn’t make 49.

Busa mav

Original Poster:

2,563 posts

155 months

Monday 29th January
quotequote all
DibblyDobbler said:
If you want any half decent shots of animals (without getting a few feet away!) I'd take a 'proper' camera - I have a Sony RX10iv (the RX10iii would also work well) which gives 600mm equivalent zoom and gives great results in good light. You could pick up a very lightly used one for your budget - I can share sample shots if you're interested smile
Yes please , decided I need something better than a phone , about turn .

Just located one new @ £1049


Edited by Busa mav on Monday 29th January 19:07

DibblyDobbler

11,277 posts

198 months

Monday 29th January
quotequote all
Great deal!

Most of my wildlife shots are of birds but you get the idea I hope. Happy to answer any queries smile


Waxwing (2) by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Peek-a-Boo! by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Oystercatcher by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Stonechat by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Stonechat Portrait by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Mrs Tufty by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Dunlin by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Riley Blue

21,038 posts

227 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Is a £1,000 investment necessary to produce what the OP has asked for, i.e. 'tourist photographs'?


Busa mav

Original Poster:

2,563 posts

155 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Riley Blue said:
Is a £1,000 investment necessary to produce what the OP has asked for, i.e. 'tourist photographs'?
I keep asking myself that, but we are so heavily vested in this holiday , I am just now not wanting to come back with any regrets.
Going to Jessops in the next couple of days to have a touchy feel, of the camera before I make the final decision.
Thanks for ALL of the comments , much appreciated.

Tea Pot One

1,849 posts

229 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Busa mav said:
I keep asking myself that, but we are so heavily vested in this holiday , I am just now not wanting to come back with any regrets.
Going to Jessops in the next couple of days to have a touchy feel, of the camera before I make the final decision.
Thanks for ALL of the comments , much appreciated.
I have an iphone 15 Pro Max and work in Jessops ... but also a Canon R5 and R8. I get to play with all the kit from all the manufacturers obviously but buy what I think I need and like.

I love cameras but wouldn't go on a holiday like you with only an iphone tbh !! Each to their own as one person is different to another.

I bridge camera like an RX10 is a great idea but bulky compared to some offerings.

How about a Canon R50 with kit lens and RF100-400 . You won't ask for more than the zoom it offers and the camera is a huge amount of camera in a small body !

I have sold a few R50's and 100-400's to people going to Africa. The camera with it's little standard lens is really small compared to a bridge camera too.

Sony A6100 with a decent zoom would surprise you too !





Edited by Tea Pot One on Tuesday 30th January 18:46

Simpo Two

85,705 posts

266 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Busa mav said:
Riley Blue said:
Is a £1,000 investment necessary to produce what the OP has asked for, i.e. 'tourist photographs'?
I keep asking myself that, but we are so heavily vested in this holiday , I am just now not wanting to come back with any regrets.
Going to Jessops in the next couple of days to have a touchy feel, of the camera before I make the final decision.
Thanks for ALL of the comments , much appreciated.
Simpo's First Law of Photography: 'It's better to have the kit and not need it, than need it and not have it'.

extraT

1,773 posts

151 months

Tony1963

4,823 posts

163 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
extraT said:
I can’t imagine how bad the results would be.

PartsMonkey

315 posts

138 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
DibblyDobbler said:
Great deal!

Most of my wildlife shots are of birds but you get the idea I hope. Happy to answer any queries smile


Waxwing (2) by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Peek-a-Boo! by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Oystercatcher by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Stonechat by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Stonechat Portrait by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Mrs Tufty by Mike Smith, on Flickr


Dunlin by Mike Smith, on Flickr
After seeing photos like that, I do question why I continue to invest in a mirrorless system

DibblyDobbler

11,277 posts

198 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
PartsMonkey said:
After seeing photos like that, I do question why I continue to invest in a mirrorless system
Cheers - the RX10iv is a very conveniant option for the casual wildlife shooter and you can get nice results in good light. Where it falls down is noise at high iso (I never go above iso1600) and busy bokeh but both of these can be worked around to a degree smile

some bloke

1,058 posts

68 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
I've been using Panasonic Lumix cameras a while now, the TZ range. They are great value for money, compact and have a Leica lens. I rarely carry my DSLR now as this will do 95% of what I want to.

Busa mav

Original Poster:

2,563 posts

155 months

Friday 2nd February
quotequote all
Thank you for all of your comments.
I went to a shop in Swindon , Great Western cameras, the guys were incredibly patient and helpful.
I tried the Sony RX10iv , but the guys were also suggesting the LUMIX FZ330.
The Sony has a truly quality feel about it compared to the LUMIX , but in the end , I went for the LUMIX . It’s smaller and substantially lighter too, which was important to me.
Rather than try for a discount, I just negotiated that I can go back in 2 weeks to go through anything I’m struggling to understand.

Given my poor history of buying cameras and then not using them once the novelty wears off , that sealed the decision and made wifey happy, who was quick to remind me I dropped £600 on ski gear last week lol

DibblyDobbler

11,277 posts

198 months

Friday 2nd February
quotequote all
Good luck with it - be nice to see some results if you feel like sharing smile

Simpo Two

85,705 posts

266 months

Friday 2nd February
quotequote all
Busa mav said:
I just negotiated that I can go back in 2 weeks to go through anything I’m struggling to understand.
There is of course us lot. Not much we don't know between us biggrin