What is this car?

Author
Discussion

eldar

Original Poster:

21,856 posts

197 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Probably 1920s, but no one seems to know what this is. All sorts of guesses, but none really likely yet. The apparent lack of front brakes seems odd. Possibly French?


nicanary

9,819 posts

147 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Rover 8 ?

Abbott

2,457 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
I see it is fitted with the Decapitating Windscreen option yikes

eldar

Original Poster:

21,856 posts

197 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
nicanary said:
Rover 8 ?
I believe it is, 1919 to 1925 so right time.

Thanks clap

ettore

4,148 posts

253 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Yes, definitely a Rover Eight.

Abbott

2,457 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Restored Rover 8

EW109

295 posts

141 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
The lack of front brakes is not odd -- lots of stuff then was rear-wheel only.

There are still cars out there with rear-wheel brakes only.

Dogwatch

6,239 posts

223 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
EW109 said:
The lack of front brakes is not odd -- lots of stuff then was rear-wheel only.

There are still cars out there with rear-wheel brakes only.
Yes, light cars, not very fast and little traffic so lack of front brakes wasn't an issue then.

Allan L

783 posts

106 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Dogwatch said:
Yes, light cars, not very fast and little traffic so lack of front brakes wasn't an issue then.
Not just small/slow cars. It was thought that front brakes would affect the steering, so quite large and fast cars (e.g. 30/98 Vauxhall) had rear brakes only. What they chose to ignore was the effect of using rear-only brakes if the car was not heading dead straight ahead. . .

Abbott

2,457 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
With wheels and tire like that it is hard imagine them not going in a straight line

Who is it in the photo?

eldar

Original Poster:

21,856 posts

197 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Abbott said:
With wheels and tire like that it is hard imagine them not going in a straight line

Who is it in the photo?
Head teacher and his wife, circa 1925. Apparently notable for happily ignoring speed limits and scaring the local population.

Hoofy

76,470 posts

283 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
They must have been small people! The video shows the car to be quite small whereas the photo makes the car look massive. biggrin

heebeegeetee

28,874 posts

249 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Front brakes are for wimps.

austin

1,284 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
Front brakes are for wimps.
If you are using brakes you aren't going fast enough.

Can't remember where I heard it but has always made me laugh.

Allan L

783 posts

106 months

Friday 1st March
quotequote all
austin said:
If you are using brakes you aren't going fast enough.

Can't remember where I heard it but has always made me laugh.
Nuvolari was reported to have said something similar at the 1933 TT (according to Alec Hounslow, his riding mechanic) but I can't find the direct quotation.