Is modern brake fluid less hygroscopic?

Is modern brake fluid less hygroscopic?

Author
Discussion

LennyM1984

Original Poster:

643 posts

69 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Today I changed/flushed the brake fluid on my Jaguar XE. It's been in there for at least 7 years and possibly longer (yeah yeah I know).

I regularly change the brake fluid on my other cars (one is for racing and so it gets bled every month or so) and so I was expecting the fluid coming out of the calipers to look a bit manky (on my race car, the fluid from the rear calipers always looks nasty).

To my surprise, the fluid looked absolutely fine and incredibly clean, and so I tested it for moisture content. The tester showed no moisture (or more accurately less than 1%).

This car gets used in all weathers, the brakes occasionally get worked etc etc. And so... is modern brake fluid simply less hygroscopic or is this "change fluid every 2 years" malarky just a nonsense for a normal car??

drmotorsport

752 posts

244 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Ooh good question! I would have thought technology has improved over the years in the same way as engine oils, but while we now have long life condition based oil changes, OEM's are still saying 2 years for a brake fluid change. You'd think OEM's would be the first to make servicing costs cheaper for that fluid as well, so maybe there's other factors in play.

GreenV8S

30,214 posts

285 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I think a lot of that depends on the design and condition of the reservoir. Old systems used to use a crude baffle which didn't seal particularly well. More modern ones seem to use bellows which seal much better. If you eliminate exposure to fresh air, the only path in for moisture is via seals and hoses, which should have very low porosity if they're in good condition.

dontlookdown

1,745 posts

94 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
As I recall, silicon based (dot5) brake fluid is not hygroscopic and doesn't absorb water, and neither does mineral oil based fluid (Citroen LHM hydraulic fluid for example).

All the other types are glycol based and do absorb water over time.


stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
LennyM1984 said:
Today I changed/flushed the brake fluid on my Jaguar XE. It's been in there for at least 7 years and possibly longer (yeah yeah I know).

I regularly change the brake fluid on my other cars (one is for racing and so it gets bled every month or so) and so I was expecting the fluid coming out of the calipers to look a bit manky (on my race car, the fluid from the rear calipers always looks nasty).

To my surprise, the fluid looked absolutely fine and incredibly clean, and so I tested it for moisture content. The tester showed no moisture (or more accurately less than 1%).

This car gets used in all weathers, the brakes occasionally get worked etc etc. And so... is modern brake fluid simply less hygroscopic or is this "change fluid every 2 years" malarky just a nonsense for a normal car??
I'd say it's a rarity that cars have their brake fluid changed every 2 years.

First time most will see new fluid, is if it needs a caliper or some other work that necessitates it. And even then, it'd be just for that item, not a complete fluid change.

austina35

346 posts

53 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Strange comment

Gary C

12,494 posts

180 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
austina35 said:
Strange comment
why ?

Megaflow

9,451 posts

226 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I am sure brake fluid has improved over the years. But notice how brake fluid changes every two years became a thing about the same time as servicing changed to yearly or longer… call me cynical but…

There was a poster on here called Max Torque, sadly gone now, and he said in a relatively low humidity country like ours there just isn’t enough moisture in the air to effect the brake fluid.

Which bakes up the years, well over ten now, of testing brake fluid and I have never seen a reading over 1%.

Edited by Megaflow on Saturday 27th April 09:17

LennyM1984

Original Poster:

643 posts

69 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Perhaps it is more about trying to encourage people to have the brakes bled every so often? I suppose that "flushing the fluid so that it doesn't boil and kill you" sounds more persuasive than, "let a little air out," despite largely being the same thing.

My brakes obviously feel much better now but that's simply because I was able to bleed some trapped air out

The fluid in my race cars has also never shown any significant moisture absorption but it does tend to get manky.


itcaptainslow

3,704 posts

137 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Depending on the car, I find the fluid starts to degrade anything between one and three years. My Elise typically gets a change annually, as even after a year the fluid has 2% moisture content.

I do the pair of “modern classics” every two years - on testing they’re typically sub 1% after two years, but for the sake of a litre of fluid, and twenty minutes of my time at service…the brakes do feel a little better after doing so. It may be placebo, but it’s worth it for my peace of mind.

The 23 year old shed I’ve just acquired had properly brown fluid that lit up every light on the tester! That got changed pronto, along with a major service and replacement of the cambelt that had been on there since 2006!

ta264

17 posts

14 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
I wonder if the other consideration is to make sure the bleed screws are used frequently enough that they don't seize up. Steel bleeders into aluminium calipers can corrode solid pretty easily.