RE: 2024 Aston Martin DBX707 | PH Review
RE: 2024 Aston Martin DBX707 | PH Review
Wednesday 12th June 2024

2024 Aston Martin DBX707 | PH Review

New touchscreen is the least exciting thing about the (slightly) revised DBX


Upmarket performance SUVs get plenty of criticism, with any PH review likely to harvest a roasting in the comments. Yet there are some things that these mega-expensive posh-roaders are really good at. Aston’s invite to drive the lightly revised DBX707 involved collecting it from the company’s Gaydon HQ and delivering it to central Edinburgh later the same day – a 350-mile journey which gave the chance to become reacquainted with its key talents.

The greatest remains the long-legged cruising ability that comes from the combination of effortless performance and a pliant chassis. The turning-up that led to the punchier 707 variant – which is going to be the only DBX going forward – didn’t turn it harsh. Low-speed ride quality over urban bumps has a bit more of an edge than in the original version, no surprise given the test car’s 22-inch wheels, but even in turned-up form the DBX remains a car that can shrink a long journey better than almost anything else. Only the 4.0-litre AMG V8’s thirst for 98-RON, and the corresponding need to briefly escape the intimate embrace of the sports seats, prevented a non-stop run north.

This is a quality that Aston’s lower and more traditional Grand Tourers have long possessed, of course. But there is definitely something about sitting higher and above the fray that de-stresses things further, especially when dealing with more-stop-than-go traffic on the M6 north of Birmingham. If there’s a better way to sit in a jam, I’m struggling to think of it.

But the DBX707’s other superpower is a less-acknowledged one, rising to the fore only after I’d turned off the motorway and was crossing the Scottish Borders. Normally I’d take the A701 from Moffat to Edinburgh via Broughton, one of the finest roads in the world. But for the DBX707 I mixed it up with a long way round route that started with the A708 from Moffat towards St. Mary’s Loch. This is another spectacular piece of tarmac, but also a very lumpy one, with the first dozen or so miles a brutal test of suspension compliance over savage crests and dips. I know from previous experience that anything low and sporty is likely to catch and ground if driven at anything other than a very prudent pace.

But the DBX707 is pretty much impervious to topography. Its combination of generous wheel travel, pliant air springs and no-nonsense adaptive dampers dealt with the rollercoaster without breaking a sweat. This is a car that doesn’t try to fight a road, rather rolls with its punches – but not with its corners. The 48-volt anti-roll system is another kind of black magic, minimizing body lean even at the same time as the suspension battles with up-and-down stuff. The forces involved must be enormous, on Aston’s numbers the DBX707 weighs as much as two MX-5s. But it makes it all seem much easier than it doubtless is. 

In the softest GT mode, there is a little bit of extra movement to be felt at speed. It’s not floatiness in terms of any lack of discipline, rather the sense that the DBX707’s body keeps moving for a beat longer than is strictly necessary from the point of control if not comfort. But putting the adaptive dampers into their Sport mode lashes it down better without turning it harsh, even when digesting an all-roughage diet. Few DBX707 buyers are likely to throw their cars over a sand dune, or down a Baja trail, but the anti-gravity impression is reminiscent of the one delivered by the Ford F-150 Raptor R I drove in the US last year.

I never drove a pre-facelift DBX707 on the A708, but I’m sure it would have felt pretty much identical. That’s because mechanical changes are slighter than Rishi Sunak’s chances of popping Champagne corks on election night. For the record, steering calibration is now lighter in GT mode, the exhaust note has been revised to give more muscular noise when delivering high torque at low revs, and the various active systems have been tweaked, mostly so that intervention arrives earlier and more subtly. 

But the core experience is basically unchanged. The V8 sounds savage and angry when extended, moody and bass-heavy at lower commitment. Torque is huge across the board, with more than enough to offset occasional kickdown hesitation as the gearbox tries to work out which of its nine speeds to opt for. There is also a very slight surge sensation when moving away from rest, likely caused by auto’s use of AMG’s wet clutch system rather than the torque converter of the axed non-707 DBX. But the basics remain on point, with the DBX707 steering accurately, gripping hard and feeling hugely stable at speed. The vast carbon-ceramic brakes, which are standard, bite hard and are easy to modulate. Yes, the DBX’s behaviour is obviously defined in large part by its size and weight, especially when thrown at tighter turns. But despite all-wheel-driven traction, the handling balance can still be turned very back-endy with the throttle. It’s a playful elephant.

So, with more than half the review covering off what’s unchanged, I should probably turn to what Aston has spent its development cash on - the DBX707’s new interior. When boss Lawrence Stroll talked to journalists earlier this year he admitted that the outgoing DBX’s cabin – and especially its clunky, outdated UI system – were the top cause of complaint from buyers and (more importantly) would-be buyers. Which is why lots of effort has been put into moving it to the new Aston Martin UX system that we’ve already seen in the DB12 and Vantage.

And this definitely isn’t just a stuck-on touchscreen. The DBX has been given a full teardown with a completely new dashboard – a major investment for a four-year-old car. The basics are very similar to the layout of the sports cars, with what is essentially the same centre console with switchgear flanking a stubby new gear selector which replaces the old P/R/N/D buttons on the outgoing car, plus a rotary drive mode selector with the stop/start button integrated into it. In front of these is a wireless charging pad, with a 10.2-inch touch-sensitive screen in the centre of the dashboard.

Okay, so not really ‘round of applause’ territory in terms of cutting-edge automotive technology, especially given the number of manufacturers now offering wall-to-wall high-definition screens. The DBX707 has physical roller controls for heating, fan speed and volume, a touch-sensitive area for seat heating and ventilation and then shortcut buttons to allow the damper stiffness and exhaust mode to be adjusted separately from the dynamic modes. Less good is the shiny black finish of the plastics, which seems to be all the rage at the moment, but which will soon be covered in fingerprints unless you drive wearing gloves.

The touchscreen has a sizeable binnacle and is laid back at an oblique angle which means it suffers from reflection when bright sunshine hits it from some directions.  The UX system is running Aston’s own Unix-based operating system, which delivers the basics in a workmanlike manner. There are some shortcut icons to one side, but navigating between other functions means going in and out of the home screen; a bit of a faff when swapping between CarPlay and something else. My 15-year-old daughter, a connoisseur of such things, reckoned it looked and worked much better than the clunky PCM system in our 2009 Cayman, but wasn’t as slick as the one in the 2020 family Skoda Superb, if that helps to place it in the UX-verse. But compared to the first DBX’s old Merc-based system, with its awkward turn-and-click control wheel, it feels like it comes from a different century. Or, in short, the revised DBX707 has got better in one key area - and stayed almost exactly the same in every other regard. Which is all it needed to do, really.


Specification | Aston Martin DBX707

Engine: 3,982cc V8, twin-turbocharged
Gearbox: nine-speed automatic, wet clutch
Power: 707hp @ 6,000rpm
Torque: 663lb ft @ 4,500rpm
0-60mph: 3.1 secs 
Top speed: 193mph (limited)
Kerbweight: 2,245kg
MPG: 19.9
CO2: 323g/km
Price: £205,000

Author
Discussion

wistec1

Original Poster:

795 posts

70 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
What a gob wide open basking shark looking thing this is. The snot green colour completes the automotive blob of vomit which Aston Martin have managed to create and that's before the Merc engine re-affirms that this is not a 100% pure bred Aston Martin.

cerb4.5lee

44,588 posts

209 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
I absolutely love the engine in these, although I've never got on with the way it looks to be fair. The colour of this one doesn't help for me for definite either.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Comical that one of the pictures is of it perched on a mound of st - says it all.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

254 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Really like these. So much more interesting and tasteful than the default Urus/Bentayga/G-wagen chavcashtic mobiles.

I’ll take mine in British Racing Green with a tan interior. Lovely.

pycraft

1,441 posts

213 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
the article said:
The UX system is running Aston’s own Unix-based operating system, which delivers the basics in a workmanlike manner.
I'm reminded of Jurassic Park - "It's a UNIX system!" says the 12-year-old. But isn't pretty much everything based on a flavour of Unix nowadays? Android is, iOS is, MacOS is... Maybe it's because AM interfaces usually look like they're coded in Fortran-77?

LooneyTunes

9,385 posts

187 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
article said:
Or, in short, the revised DBX707 has got better in one key area - and stayed almost exactly the same in every other regard. Which is all it needed to do, really.
What it needs to do is sell, and sell in volume. AM had their hopes pinned on, IIRC, 6000 units per annum.

I can't see such a minor update doing much to stimulate sustained demand.

Mercutio

334 posts

191 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
If we’re actually staying on topic for a minute, this is the necessary revision Aston needed to do to this vehicle. The interiors of the recent era have always been a weak point. This at least removes one obstacle from buyer’s minds.

I am afraid to say though , that aside from the so called heritage and romance of this brand, I cannot see a reason why I would buy this over a P615 Range Rover, or a Cayenne S.

The styling is … challenging for me. It looks bulbous in places, the duck tail spoiler just doesn’t sit right with the rest of the design.

But there’s something about the image of the thing.. what are we trying to say when we buy this? It doesn’t sit well with me.

The strangest thing for me is this obsession of automotive reviewers with “sitting high up”. It is the gold standard for a passenger car now, more so than road dynamics or cornering or whatever. Just stick a foot pump under the car, and traffic becomes easier because you can “see over” the other cars. Ugh.


stuckmojo

4,056 posts

217 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
These have grown on me.

However, I don't like the interior at all and I think the early version with a smaller grille was much better looking.

JohnG1

3,487 posts

234 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
pycraft said:
the article said:
The UX system is running Aston’s own Unix-based operating system, which delivers the basics in a workmanlike manner.
I'm reminded of Jurassic Park - "It's a UNIX system!" says the 12-year-old. But isn't pretty much everything based on a flavour of Unix nowadays? Android is, iOS is, MacOS is... Maybe it's because AM interfaces usually look like they're coded in Fortran-77?
Snark aside, it's probably QNX...

So while it's POSIX compliant it is not listed on opengroup.com list of UNIX license holders. QNX is a proprietary microkernel based architecture.


Oh, the car should have a 5.2 V12 unit and not the AMG donk.
Or even the 5935 V12...

Familymad

2,311 posts

246 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Yep agree, green and tan.

DonkeyApple

69,838 posts

198 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Stroll has actually done an excellent job when it comes to putting some style and elegance back into the cars designed under the king of chavs.

Whether one likes Larry Strulović or loathes, he has spent a career fondling handbags and schmutter and knows what he is doing in this regard.

The cabins of all these cars just got worse and worse under the Dave and Bez Pension Fund reign of terror. Ford had done a rather nice job moving on from the dubious but budget constrained DB7 and delivering a cabin on the DB9 and then the stable and elegance just got steadily stripped away with the cabin of the DBX just being a complete joke as all the money had been removed and they just slung some Merc gubbins in and hoped a load of mug Chinese ladies would buy it up.

All of the cabin reworks under Stroll have been good and the models now have cabins that no longer mock the price tag.

The DBX is an amazing car. It drives brilliantly. The exterior looks are a challenge. I'm hoping this is going to be like the Cayenne which now looks fine but when VW first put the 911 image on a van it did look very odd.

CG2020UK

2,962 posts

69 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Absolutely love it since it was first released!

Just think it looks brilliant and even better in person.

Guyr

2,542 posts

311 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
No comment on the car, but I must say what a beautiful set of photos these are - kudos to the photographer. (Particularly the bridge photo and the splash one).

Arsecati

2,780 posts

146 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Imagine this entire car, but wrapped up in the body of something like a Rapide Estate (updated Bertone Jet 2+2 anyone?). Ahhhhhh, but to dream (disregarding the small matter that I wouldn't be able to afford a new one of them either!!).

DonkeyApple

69,838 posts

198 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Arsecati said:
Imagine this entire car, but wrapped up in the body of something like a Rapide Estate (updated Bertone Jet 2+2 anyone?). Ahhhhhh, but to dream (disregarding the small matter that I wouldn't be able to afford a new one of them either!!).
Rapide estate allroad. That would be nice. biggrin

Wab1974uk

1,395 posts

56 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
So, if you want a DBX, you can only have it with 707bhp?

Surely, there are lots of people who want a DBX just not one quite so powerful. Strange decision to me.

andy43

13,195 posts

283 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Really like these. So much more interesting and tasteful than the default Urus/Bentayga/G-wagen chavcashtic mobiles.

I’ll take mine in British Racing Green with a tan interior. Lovely.
Same. If I’d had to have bought something like this it’d probably have been the Aston - now they’ve sorted the dash out it would be top of the list. Still wouldn’t, but it’s nice they’ve brought it up to the new Vantage level.

tim milne

348 posts

262 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Mercutio said:
The strangest thing for me is this obsession of automotive reviewers with “sitting high up”. It is the gold standard for a passenger car now, more so than road dynamics or cornering or whatever. Just stick a foot pump under the car, and traffic becomes easier because you can “see over” the other cars. Ugh.
Except it isn't because everyone else is also "sitting high up"

CKY

2,268 posts

44 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
The cabins of all these cars just got worse and worse under the Dave and Bez Pension Fund reign of terror. Ford had done a rather nice job moving on from the dubious but budget constrained DB7 and delivering a cabin on the DB9 and then the stable and elegance just got steadily stripped away with the cabin of the DBX just being a complete joke as all the money had been removed and they just slung some Merc gubbins in and hoped a load of mug Chinese ladies would buy it up.
Interesting that you care Aston previously stuffed their interior compartments full of Mercedes technology, but aren't bothered by the fact Aston stopped making their own V8/V12 N/A engines and are now just stuffing in off-the-shelf Mercedes engines and gearboxes? Sign of how consumers view these things from a showroom POV I suppose.


LooneyTunes

9,385 posts

187 months

Wednesday 12th June 2024
quotequote all
Wab1974uk said:
So, if you want a DBX, you can only have it with 707bhp?

Surely, there are lots of people who want a DBX just not one quite so powerful. Strange decision to me.
It started out with a less powerful version. Sales only seemed to come when the 707 was launched. AM now dropping the less powerful versus suggests there wasn’t demand for them.

Mercutio said:
I am afraid to say though , that aside from the so called heritage and romance of this brand, I cannot see a reason why I would buy this over a P615 Range Rover, or a Cayenne S.
I agree, but there are plenty of people will try to say that the market for a class above this is sufficiently sizeable. Out of idle curiosity, this morning I speced a FFRR, £145-150k for what I’d want (s/c autobiography). No point paying £200k+ For a DBX (which I can’t do anyway because of its tow weight limit).