Portable bidet/douche sprays

Portable bidet/douche sprays

Author
Discussion

Risonax

Original Poster:

404 posts

28 months

Sunday 7th July 2024
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 24 July 2024 at 00:32

ThunderSpook

3,775 posts

223 months

Sunday 7th July 2024
quotequote all
Daft question, your wife doesn’t live with you?

Flumpo

4,024 posts

85 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
One of these, if she doesn’t like it call her a filthy pig:


RC1807

13,238 posts

180 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
ThunderSpook said:
Daft question, your wife doesn’t live with you?
That’s what the OP implied.

rlw

3,439 posts

249 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
ThunderSpook said:
Daft question, your wife doesn’t live with you?
Possibly she is not allowed to due to the idiotic laws the Tories came up with over the last 14 years.

Flumpo

4,024 posts

85 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
Jesus wept. The OP wants to know how his wife can jet wash her dirty dump off her bum. Not speculation on his living arrangements.

motco

16,497 posts

258 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
Flumpo said:
One of these, if she doesn’t like it call her a filthy pig:

She wants to wash herself not blow her bloody head off! biggrin

Some Gump

12,941 posts

198 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
Flumpo said:
One of these, if she doesn’t like it call her a filthy pig:

Too powerful. You need the detuned version, i think they call it a ste Hawk.

MBVitoria

2,533 posts

235 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
That looks like a third party knock off of the Colapz one - https://colapz.co.uk/collections/portable-showers

I've had this in my campervan for years and use it when camping but also for washing the dog at the end of a walk or hosing the kids muddy wellies off. Dunk the pump in a 25l container and it flows about 3l per min when used as a shower or you can use the trigger action for more control.

Really nice little product and surprisingly powerful.

I expect it would be more than adequate to use as a bidet substitute!


bennno

13,483 posts

281 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
Risonax said:
Well, besides it being NOYB, there is the small matter of a non-refundable ~£1500 fee for a 2.5 year visa, plus £3000 up front NHS surcharge, to be repeated after 2.5 years, unless the government decides on another punitive and unjustifiable increase to the costs, or unreasonable increase in my salary requirements. Yes, £1500 fee for processing pretty much the same paperwork as a £100 holiday visa. Most appications are refused, without reason given, so a nice money earner for the government broadly supported by the general population. We do what we can in the face of a discriminatory immigration policy which seeks to punish people. I'll likely be eventually forced into exile because of this, which will be rewarded by a frozen pension.
Surely you spend more than £1500 going backwards and forwards to see your wife?

Have you had an application refused?

Super Sonic

8,869 posts

66 months

Monday 8th July 2024
quotequote all
Do you have a shower? Can your wife do hanstands?

motco

16,497 posts

258 months

Tuesday 9th July 2024
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
Do you have a shower? Can your wife do hanstands?
Must keep the mouth closed though... tongue out

dxg

9,206 posts

272 months

Tuesday 9th July 2024
quotequote all
I would go with your first suggestion and ignore the regs.

The others all look rather ad-hoc and won't be powerful enough or pleasant to use. They also seem rather temporary which may not give your wife the best impression.

98elise

29,228 posts

173 months

Tuesday 9th July 2024
quotequote all
dxg said:
I would go with your first suggestion and ignore the regs.

The others all look rather ad-hoc and won't be powerful enough or pleasant to use. They also seem rather temporary which may not give your wife the best impression.
This.

My brother had one installed after a holiday to Thailand and thinking they were a good idea. He was having his bathroom refurbished so it was easy to get the plumber to fit one.

Just stick a check valve to be safe, but the likelihood of anything getting into the drinking supply is miniscule.

Risonax

Original Poster:

404 posts

28 months

Wednesday 10th July 2024
quotequote all
98elise said:
This.

My brother had one installed after a holiday to Thailand and thinking they were a good idea. He was having his bathroom refurbished so it was easy to get the plumber to fit one.

Just stick a check valve to be safe, but the likelihood of anything getting into the drinking supply is miniscule.
I agree; the likelihood is very small. I'm spooked by some plumbers mentioning liability.



The risk is if someone drops the hose into the toilet bowl, and there is a siphoning effect. Mulling it over. The devices look easy to fit, but I don't know where to start in finding the correct check valve wrt to thread size.

In Thailand, they work great, but over there, no one drinks the tap water, even though, in theory, it leaves the treatment works in a potable condition.

I'm guessing Australian tap water is similar quality to UK, and maybe their regulators have been forced to look at these more, and the UK is erring on the side of (understandable) caution, since they are still not very common. There probably is more genuine risk with those devices that fit to toilet seats, because of the aerosol generated during flushing.

A good solution would be someone to come up with an electric spray that draws straight from the cistern. Mine is one of those without an overflow hole to poke in a hose.

98elise

29,228 posts

173 months

Wednesday 10th July 2024
quotequote all
Risonax said:
98elise said:
This.

My brother had one installed after a holiday to Thailand and thinking they were a good idea. He was having his bathroom refurbished so it was easy to get the plumber to fit one.

Just stick a check valve to be safe, but the likelihood of anything getting into the drinking supply is miniscule.
I agree; the likelihood is very small. I'm spooked by some plumbers mentioning liability.




The risk is if someone drops the hose into the toilet bowl, and there is a siphoning effect. Mulling it over. The devices look easy to fit, but I don't know where to start in finding the correct check valve wrt to thread size.

In Thailand, they work great, but over there, no one drinks the tap water, even though, in theory, it leaves the treatment works in a potable condition.

I'm guessing Australian tap water is similar quality to UK, and maybe their regulators have been forced to look at these more, and the UK is erring on the side of (understandable) caution, since they are still not very common. There probably is more genuine risk with those devices that fit to toilet seats, because of the aerosol generated during flushing.

A good solution would be someone to come up with an electric spray that draws straight from the cistern. Mine is one of those without an overflow hole to poke in a hose.
If the hose/spray is under mains pressure then I can't see how the it could ever syphon. It would need a sequence of failures.

You're in more danger from not washing your hands properly after wiping.

tux850

1,916 posts

101 months

Wednesday 10th July 2024
quotequote all
98elise said:
If the hose/spray is under mains pressure then I can't see how the it could ever syphon. It would need a sequence of failures.
The risk only manifests itself when the supply is lost.

98elise

29,228 posts

173 months

Wednesday 10th July 2024
quotequote all
tux850 said:
98elise said:
If the hose/spray is under mains pressure then I can't see how the it could ever syphon. It would need a sequence of failures.
The risk only manifests itself when the supply is lost.
But you would also need the spray to be in the toilet, and the valve open, so multiple failures. A check valve would significantly lower the risk further.