Cars and Bikes
Author
Discussion

JuanCarlosFandango

Original Poster:

9,789 posts

100 months

Thursday 25th July 2024
quotequote all
Why do so few companies do both?

Off the top of my head I could only think of BMW, Honda and Suzuki who have done both on any scale. Peugeot dabble with some scooters, and I know there's specialist companies like Arial and KTM who make both in small numbers, and a few prototypes or showpieces. There are still some big omissions though. Ford and Mercedes who make buses, trucks, tractors, vans and millions of cars. Daewoo who made everything from microwaves to cargo ships never bothered with a motorbike.
Subaru, Alfa Romeo, Renault and Audi all owe us decent bikes too.

Then there's bike makers like Yamaha and Kawasaki who really ought to make nifty little sports cars or off roaders, or Harley who could make a hot rod type thing.

It seems like a missed opportunity from a branding point of view, especially for the big car companies who could add on a motorcycle division fairly cheaply. I understand it would be a big ask for Norton or Bimota to build a car, especially at any scale but surely Triumph or MV Agusta might have had a go.

Why is it? And what ones would you like to see?

gazza285

11,146 posts

237 months

Thursday 25th July 2024
quotequote all
Triumph did both for a while, before splitting into two distinct companies.

Audi are part of VW, who also own Ducati.

Other than the internal combustion engine there isn’t much engineering overlap, and the respective engines have very different design parameters and power delivery.

DP14

381 posts

68 months

Thursday 25th July 2024
quotequote all
As above, there's very little overlap.

The few who do are ones who kept bike and car production, whereas many other bike manufacturers failed while some transitioned, with varying success, from bikes to cars (e.g. Swallow/Jaguar, Triumph, NSU). Bicycle to motorcycle to car production was a natural progression to grow, Daimler and Ford started at cars.

Btw Peugeot (cars) exited scooters a few years ago. Ford exited trucks, proper trucks (18-wheelers/HGVs) years ago although it does have a JV with Otosan.

Bike brands tend to sit in groups making large volumes of budget bikes or making similar small-engined/small vehicle products e.g. ATVs, jet skis, ride on mowers like Honda or Kawasaki do, similarly Victory/Indian as part of Polaris.

Bike manufacturer's will have neither the money, expertise nor resources to enter the car market with anything other than very niche products, which will risk bankrupting them during development or through disappointing sales. Car brands have little to offer the bike market either, which already has it's own very strong, storied brands. Electric bikes, however, may be a different matter.

Edited by DP14 on Thursday 25th July 23:04

JuanCarlosFandango

Original Poster:

9,789 posts

100 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Interesting replies, thank you.

Makes sense from a technical and production point of view I was thinking more of the branding angle.

stoop44rio

111 posts

217 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Yamaha do make car engines, V8 that Volvo used in S80. I think there are others but can’t remember.

Dog Star

17,590 posts

197 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
I’m sure I saw somewhere that Yamaha made the bodies (or something)?for the Mk2 MR2.

As to Kawasaki - they make everything.

Soloman Dodd

1,104 posts

71 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
DP14 said:
Bike manufacturer's will have neither the money, expertise nor resources to enter the car market with anything other than very niche products, which will risk bankrupting them during development or through disappointing sales. Car brands have little to offer the bike market either, which already has it's own very strong, storied brands. Electric bikes, however, may be a different matter.

Edited by DP14 on Thursday 25th July 23:04
Ariel is an example, the Atom and the Ace.

Lo-Fi

1,290 posts

99 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
I've always wondered why BMW don't make vans, trucks etc, and Merc don't make bikes. I just assumed they agreed not to tread on each others toes.

Oceanrower

1,359 posts

141 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Lo-Fi said:
I've always wondered why BMW don't make vans, trucks etc, and Merc don't make bikes. I just assumed they agreed not to tread on each others toes.
Mercedes used to own 25% of MV Agusta…

Edited by Oceanrower on Friday 26th July 09:16

JuanCarlosFandango

Original Poster:

9,789 posts

100 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Oceanrower said:
Mercedes own (or, at least, did own) 25% of MV Agusta…
That's a good example of what seems to be missing. I didn't know Mercedes owned a chunk of MV. Surely even a badge engineered Turismo would open up a whole new market? A relatively small investment to give it more of a Mercedes feel could produce a really appealing bike.

Watcher of the skies

1,312 posts

66 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
DP14 said:
As above, there's very little overlap.

The few who do are ones who kept bike and car production, whereas many other bike manufacturers failed while some transitioned, with varying success, from bikes to cars (e.g. Swallow/Jaguar, Triumph, NSU). Bicycle to motorcycle to car production was a natural progression to grow, Daimler and Ford started at cars.

Btw Peugeot (cars) exited scooters a few years ago. Ford exited trucks, proper trucks (18-wheelers/HGVs) years ago although it does have a JV with Otosan.

Bike brands tend to sit in groups making large volumes of budget bikes or making similar small-engined/small vehicle products e.g. ATVs, jet skis, ride on mowers like Honda or Kawasaki do, similarly Victory/Indian as part of Polaris.

Bike manufacturer's will have neither the money, expertise nor resources to enter the car market with anything other than very niche products, which will risk bankrupting them during development or through disappointing sales. Car brands have little to offer the bike market either, which already has it's own very strong, storied brands. Electric bikes, however, may be a different matter.

Edited by DP14 on Thursday 25th July 23:04
BSA, Raleigh, Singer, Humber and Rover all had a history of starting with bike/motorcycle manufacturing before moving into cars. Rover invented the "safety bicycle" frame made up of triangles which is the basic design of all bicycles since.

roboxm3

2,485 posts

224 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
stoop44rio said:
Yamaha do make car engines, V8 that Volvo used in S80. I think there are others but can’t remember.
Lexus LFA!!

carinaman

25,172 posts

201 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
roboxm3 said:
stoop44rio said:
Yamaha do make car engines, V8 that Volvo used in S80. I think there are others but can’t remember.
Lexus LFA!!
Did they make the 1.7 in the Puma and Puma Racing?

JuanCarlosFandango

Original Poster:

9,789 posts

100 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Lo-Fi said:
I've always wondered why BMW don't make vans, trucks etc, and Merc don't make bikes. I just assumed they agreed not to tread on each others toes.
I can sort of understand that. BMWs brand is sport and luxury cars. I can see why they might think vans would undermine that. By the same token I can see why Volvo whose brand is about sensible, practical cars wouldn't want to build bikes.

DP14

381 posts

68 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
JuanCarlosFandango said:
...I was thinking more of the branding angle.
From a brand perspective, they are not strong enough.

The strength car brands have built over decades is mirrored in the bike world and car brands can't just elbow them out of the way. Land Rover has its off road heritage, so does Honda, BMW and KTM with their Dakar rally history. Ferrari has its 'emotion' and race heritage, so does Ducati. Porsche, BMW, etc. have their performance, race wins and iconic liveries, so do Yamaha, Honda, err BMW, etc. Developing that legitimacy and authenticity would take time.

There's been some branding exercises e.g. a Lotus bike, at least a concept, a Lambo Ducati, Harley-Davidson Ford pickups, just as there have been Ferrari, AMG and Aston branded boats. But these have a limited fanboy market, just as few stereo shoppers will seriously consider a Lamborghini or Porsche exhaust-themed item or (slightly differently) Porsche Design is not troubling Rolex or Breitling.

birky

52 posts

169 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Yamaha and Toyota work together a fair bit on engines.
Porsche did work on Harley engines (and maybe Triumphs?).
Ricardo did work on straight-4 BMW bike engines

the-norseman

15,767 posts

200 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Volkswagen AG owns Ducati through Audi AG

Dapster

9,471 posts

209 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
FIAT flirted with motocycle production in the 50's. This amazing thing never made production but had a few innovations, including a suspension system that worked from between the hub and rim



https://thevintagent.com/2019/11/19/moto-major-ita...

darkyoung1000

2,477 posts

225 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Did they make the 1.7 in the Puma and Puma Racing?
They did, and the 1.25 Zetec SE (same family) as well. A joint collaboration between Ford, Yamaha and Mazda I think.

oddman

4,254 posts

281 months

Friday 26th July 2024
quotequote all
Quite a few arms manufacturers diversified into motorbikes so the arms trade provides a thread linking car and motorbike manufacturers.

Small arms manufacturers BSA, Enfield and Benelli spring to mind. Motorbikes were probably a fairly simple product to diversify into post WWI. BMW (aero engines) Porsche (tanks etc) and Messerschmidt were banned from military activity post WWII so concentrated on civilian motor transport.