RE: 2024 MG Cyberster GT | PH Review

RE: 2024 MG Cyberster GT | PH Review

Tuesday 15th October 2024

2024 MG Cyberster GT | PH Review

The Cyberster is already the most exciting MG in decades - how does it drive?


Let’s kick-off with a hypothetical. Were I to ask a PH Sunday Service gathering, ‘Who here owns an MG 6?’ I’d be lucky to get one hand up; probably the fella wearing the ‘I gave up on life and bought an MG 6’ knitted tank top. And if I asked, ‘Who has an MG 4?’ I bet quite a few hands would rise, with some confidence, too. After all, it’s a good electric car for the price. Nothing wrong with that. But asking, ‘Who here would like to own an MG Cyberster?’ would, I reckon, have hands shooting up like daffodils in spring.

Even if you don’t agree with my hypothesis, there’s no denying the upward journey of the SAIC-era MG: the uninteresting ugly ducklings are turning into desirable swans. And from my point of view, the Cyberster is a swan.  I had it for four days, and every time I glimpsed it from the living room window I spent lingering moments studying its design. I spotted all sorts of notes: Corvette C8 and F-Type in its overall design, with hints of original Z4 in the swoops along its flanks. I’m not saying the styling is perfect, mind. Those arrow-shaped rear lights make the backend look like an illuminated contraflow sign but, overall, it’s a hit. 

I know it is because everyone stares at this all-electric, two-door, drop-top as it whooshes by. They come to ask you about it when it’s parked, too. Of course they do. With its sleekness and scissor doors, it could be £200k and Italian. But it isn’t. It’s British, sort of. Sure, it has the might of Chinese industry behind it, but it was designed by a Brit – Carl Gotham – at SAIC’s Advanced Design Studio in Marylebone, London, England.

Whatever you think, can we agree that the MG badge finally adorns something that looks like an MG should? Good. And it’s priced like an MG should be, too. Rather than £200k, the entry-level, 340hp, rear-wheel-drive Trophy is £55k. It does 0-62mph in 5.0 seconds, but that’s not the car you’re gawping at here. This is the top-tier, dual-motor GT. It has 503hp and, accompanied by a hefty 535lb ft of shove, does 0-62mph in 3.2 seconds. Yet it costs only £60k. I say ‘only’ because rumour has it the all-electric Boxster will start at £75k, while the Polestar 6 will be even more – perhaps twice that – when it arrives. And if you think the Boxster will come as well kitted out as the Cyberster, you’re one peg short of a clothes rack. 

Whether it’s in Trophy or GT spec, the Cyberster is loaded to the gunwales with features. The only options I can see are different paint colours and a red hood – instead of the standard black. So the Cyberster is a halo for MG – something for punters to dream about – but ownership is far from a pipe dream.

Is it built to a price, then? No. The interior feels far from cheap. It has lashings of (admittedly faux) leather and Alcantara, all stitched neatly. And despite some serious prodding to prove otherwise, it appears to be built as well as any current Porsche I’ve tested recently. As well as its interesting mix of materials the interior, like the exterior, is another interesting mix of styles. Again, the Corvette C8 comes to mind in the wrap-around screens, while the small, portrait-orientated central screen, which runs the climate controls among other things, reminds me of a McLaren 570S’s. But there was something else the overall style reminded me of, and it took a while before I twigged.

It’s only flippin’ K.I.T.T. At last, my boyhood fantasy (the other one) becomes reality. The multitude of screens make it a doppelganger for Michael Knight’s BFF and that’s not all: it’s ridiculously quick, powered by a futuristic propulsion system, it talks to you, you can talk to it, and it drives itself. I mean, come on, that’s uncanny, right? So I should’ve been in heaven, but…

The Cyberster’s challenges start with those fancy doors. They’ll no doubt appeal hugely to young geeks, old show-offs, and many in between, but I lost interest in them within 20 minutes. Now, I have no problem with scissor doors. On McLarens they boost the theatre and the practicality if you’re parked in a tight spot. But those are manually operated, while the Cyberster’s are electric. And S.L.O.O.O.O.W.

How slow? Slower than the slowest and most frustrating electrically powered tailgate you’ve ever encountered. Slow enough that you get really annoyed waiting for them to open, and dread forgetting something in the car – life’s too short for such a palaver. And get this: despite their glacial speed, they have a sensor that’s meant to stop you getting whacked in the chops as they come up. Seriously? The only person who could accidentally get hit in the face by a Cyberster’s door is the sort of person who’d get run over by a steamroller – and quite frankly, just hand them a Darwin Award and leave ‘em to it.

If you stand anywhere close to the door while it’s in slow motion, the sensor stops it. And when you press the open button to restart it, it goes back down again before you can make it come back up. At this point you’re scanning the scenery for rocks – either to break the window to get in or bash yourself over the head, just to make the misery stop.

Once you’re finally inside there’s another problem. I’m 6’3”, or 191cm for those reading in decimal, and, well, I don’t quite fit. Technically, yes, I can squeeze my limbs, torso, head and into the Cyberster, but it’s never properly accommodating. I’ve read that MG UK asked for the seating position to be lowered specifically for our market, but it’s still way too high for a sports car. My eyes were level with the top of the windscreen, forcing me to slouch in the seat, which compounded the lack of legroom. If you’re less than six feet you’ll probably fit fine, but you’ll still feel like you’re sitting on the Cyberster, whereas you’ll feel happily ensconced in a Boxster.

My next gripe is with the screens, of which there are four. The central instrument screen is fine: it shows the important stuff, like speed and range, and you can configure it to look classic or more space-agey. Then you have the two screens flanking it. The one on the left is mainly for the infotainment functions; the one on the right for other stuff, like trip data and software updates. Trouble is, both are quite small and obscured by the steering wheel, so seeing them, let alone operating any of the tiny icons, is tricky.

Then there’s the central, lower screen I mentioned earlier. It does the climate controls but other things, too, like the drive modes and screen brightness. It’s also quite small and includes random stuff, like the teeniest icon you’ve ever seen for turning on the fog lights. But the main issue is the sheer number of screens. If you’re forgetful, like me, you genuinely lose track of what feature is where.

As a result, I spent lots of time not looking where I was going, with the Cyberster bonging me, telling me to concentrate on the road. That’s a sensible instruction, but when the car’s a minefield of screens and icons, I felt I was being set up to fail. And my, my, the Cyberster loves a bong, and for all sorts of reasons. Each one had me looking away from the road again to read a tiny message telling me what I was doing wrong this time. I’d get a bong for that, too.

On the plus side, the roof goes up and down in around 10 seconds, which feels fast relative to the doors. And despite the bouffant buffeting – due to my hair being in the airflow – driving an electric roadster roof down is surprisingly fun. You’d think the silence would make the experience sterile but no: it’s terrific. There’s something rather enlivening in hearing the sounds of the outside world as you whiz through it. It’s like sitting in a stealth fighter on wheels – or K.I.T.T. in Silent Mode.

And when you ramp the motors up to full poke – by pressing the big, red, Super Sport driving mode button on the steering wheel – it’s like K.I.T.T. in Pursuit Mode. By ‘eck it’s quick. So quick that the first time I opened up the taps – or should that be transistors these days? – my girlfriend, who’s Brazilian, reverted subconsciously to blaspheming in her mother tongue. So, if you heard a Doppler effect scream of ‘Jesus Cristo!’ and were offended, she’s very sorry.

In Super Sport mode it’s so quick it rattles your eyeballs, and that’s not a simile. It really does, or at the very least gives them a wobble because the Cyberster’s straight-line pace made my vision go squiffy. If you’re an MGB owner, puffing on your pipe and twiddling your toes in your tweed slippers, thinking, ‘It’s time for an upgrade,’ a word of caution: you will feel like that chimpanzee they launched into space.

You can also turn on some fake engine noise and, unexpectedly, I liked this. It has three volume settings, and I liked it so much I chose the loudest. Not everyone will approve of fake noise, of course, which is why you can turn it off. But for me it added some aural drama when I fancied a change from the thrill of serenity.

Speaking of which, the refinement is good with the hood up. There’s not much road or wind noise, although there’s a bit of a shimmy through the body. That surprised me. After all, the Cyberster sits on MG’s Modular Scalable Platform (same as the MG4), with the battery forming part of the car’s backbone, so I thought it would be more rigid. Other than the shimmy, though, I was impressed by the suspension in town. The roads near me are generally awful, but the Cyberster padded over them deftly without thumping abrasively, even over the worst potholes. There’s just an underlying firmness at slow speed but, for a sports car, it’s not punishing by any stretch.

When I did stretch the Cyberster, on a country road, I discovered another limitation. You know what I’m going to say now, don’t you? Yes, it’s the dreaded weight issue. This car, in GT spec, is 1,985kg. That’s over half a tonne more than a Boxster and it shows. Along a typical, undulating British B road, the Cyberster is out of sorts – the under-damped vertical movements pushing it, and me, out of our comfort zone. Maybe the Trophy will feel a little more controlled without the 100kg front motor.

The GT is more at home on smooth, sweeping A roads. That’s where you can exploit its healthy grip, decent balance and accurate steering. There’s not much surface sensation through the wheel, but the steering’s nicely weighted in its default mode. If you prefer it heavier or lighter, you can mix and match the steering’s weight and other parameters by delving into the individual drive-mode settings.

What about the brakes? Well, even Porsche doesn’t always get its regen braking right, so…hats off to MG, which has. You can lean on the brakes with confidence thanks to their progression and ultimate bite. You alter the amount of regen by clicking the left-hand paddle – from little to pronounced – plus there’s a one-pedal mode and an auto mode, which slows the car automatically depending on, say, if the car in front slows down.

Both versions have a usable battery capacity of 74.4kWh. If you fancy the Trophy you get a combined WLTP range of 316 miles, while for the GT it’s 276 miles. Either is a pretty good tally for a sports car. The 38-minute wait for a 10-80 per cent charge is acceptable, too – bearing in mind this isn’t a mile-munching company car.

Other things to note? Well, the boot’s a good size and there’s space for soft bags behind the seats; unlike an Alpine A110, you won’t struggle to store your wash bag in the MG. And being an MG  – a modern one – it’s warranted for seven years and 80,000 miles. It only needs a service once a year or every 15,000 miles, too.

Right, would I buy a Cyberster over an A110 or a Boxster, then? No. I’d buy either of those instead because they’re nimble sports cars. The Cyberster isn’t a nimble sports car. If anything it’s a soft grand tourer, which is fine, but  because I don’t really fit it’s not the GT for me. Yet there’s a reason I’ve wanged on about it in such detail: despite its flaws, I like the Cyberster, and I really admire MG for making it. MG’s beaten everyone in delivering an affordable, usable, two-door, electric drop-top – and yes, that includes the Tesla Roadster, which was neither cheap nor usable. This one is, and while it’s not perfect even the silly electric scissors doors demonstrate it’s not a car that’s been done on the cheap.

If MG went ‘doors to manual’ and tweaked the suspension, would I buy one then? Perhaps, but only when I’m older. And no, not because the Cyberster’s another ‘old man’s’ MG’. But were I to shrink a little that would solve the space issue, so then I’d fit.


SPECIFICATION | 2024 MG CYBERSTER GT

Engine: Dual electric motor, 77kWh battery (74.4kWh usable)
Transmission: single-speed, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 503
Torque (lb ft): 535
0-62mph: 3.2sec
Top speed: 125mph
Weight: 1,985kg
Range: 276 miles (144kW max charge)
Efficiency: 3.2mi/kWh 
Price: £59,995

Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,914 posts

232 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Kinda wish the doors were 'normal' but well done for this being one of only two available cabriolet BEVs (the other being Maserati's GranCabrio Folgore) on the market presently.

Lotusgav

152 posts

173 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Electric F-type? They’re pretty lardy as well aren’t they…

Bencolem

1,127 posts

253 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Welcome back John, we've missed you.

chirurgus

322 posts

230 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Yes, indeed, welcome back John. You disappeared without the usual PH "farewell" article. I've always enjoyed your writing, so its good to see you return.

sege

599 posts

236 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Has John been away? Welcome back. One of the best motoring journos around.
The MG seems.....ok-ish? Not too bad. That's kinda good, for an MG.
I'm surprised how huge it looks in the front shot with the driver.

VSKeith

1,326 posts

61 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Glad it exists but it's a no from me, Clive

anonymous-user

68 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Why does it need servicing more often than your average ICE vehicle?

m62tu

61 posts

53 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
The first car from PRC that I like visually in and out. Still not a fan of EV powerplants but that's where we're headed. I wish this was British built and MG was associated with England. So many brand especially motorcycles, brought from the dead and regenerated in China.

Twinair

859 posts

156 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
So it’s not a drivers - nimble - sports car, but it’s pretty cheap, accelerates well & has some roof down appeal.

Sounds alright?

It wouldn’t be for me with the EV power, but hey, for those that like this kind of thing, it looks ok - no?

FaustF

772 posts

168 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Great to have your writing back John, always really valued your reviews.

Could you perhaps go into your experience with the Range a tad more, is it honest or not, I find the Harry Metcalfe style of KWH breakdown quite useful.

Having said all that, an EV GT or Sports Car is absolutely not my cup of tea!

Edited by FaustF on Tuesday 15th October 07:18


Edited by FaustF on Tuesday 15th October 07:18

covmutley

3,211 posts

204 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
SAIC can get lost and come back when their human rights and environmental damage record has improved.

If you want to pay peanuts for a brand new car because corners have been cut, then fair enough. But this isn't even a cheap car.

Gary29

4,492 posts

113 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
I skimmed over the article, and looked at the pictures, I don't hate it, apart from the door openings, I quite like it.

cerb4.5lee

36,786 posts

194 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
As others have said, it is great to have you back John. beer

I do find myself strangely attracted to these, and I find them a bit of a guilty pleasure if you know what I mean. I think that is because I'm generally a fan of 2 seater roadsters though.

I usually like noisy stuff, but I quite like that this is a bit different.

kambites

69,369 posts

235 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Seems to do what many (probably most?) "sports car" buyers want, so I suspect it'll sell pretty well even with the gripes. Especially given that it has no real competition at the moment.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 15th October 07:43

Robertb

2,691 posts

252 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Very funny article… loved the paras on the doors!

Out of curiosity why would an EV need an annual service?

dinkel

27,400 posts

272 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Tiff Needell did a short clip with an excellent comment:

How will a driver react when his or her EV will go wrong?

Controlling a 2 tonne lump of steel in a too-quick corner is not for the faint hearted...

Just my 2 pence

Maybe EV an MX-5 and try to keep it under 1500 kgs?

Sod the range then...

NJJ

479 posts

94 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
A fantastic review John, superbly written and genuinely informative and entertaining. I like the looks, hate the name and the electric doors and infernal warning bongs would drive me doolally tap!! A used i8 Roadster would get my imaginary pot of money if I were after something similar.

SDK

1,642 posts

267 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Me and my son checked out a Cyberster at our local MG dealer - it's looks flipping amazing !

He wants one as his first car love

Numeric

1,479 posts

165 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
There is so much one could talk about regarding subsidies and human rights and pollution etc. but purely thinking cars this is for me the most important Chinese car.

It literally does what we would have expected European brands to have done first, and does it first. It underlines to me that traditional manufactures are now just largely equal with their Chinese equivalents and the Chinese have what it takes to overwhelm our traditional industries, not just with low prices but with compelling product offerings. This is simply a dash good car - and the rate of progress shows no sign of slowing!

cerb4.5lee

36,786 posts

194 months

Tuesday 15th October 2024
quotequote all
Power (hp): 503.
Torque (lb ft): 535.

Top speed: 125mph.

I know I've grumbled about this before, but I still struggle to get my head around how a car can have those bhp and torque figures, and still only manage a 125mph top speed. This is obviously a car for the traffic light GP, rather than the autobahn in fairness though.