skyline R33 GTR @ knockhill
skyline R33 GTR @ knockhill
Author
Discussion

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

250 months

Saturday 24th September 2005
quotequote all
http://img313.imageshack.us/img313/5711/63286mn.jpg

HankScorpio

715 posts

259 months

Saturday 24th September 2005
quotequote all
V Nice!

(I would perhaps crop tighter on the left to get rid of the scaffolding and dust, but that is really nit-picking!)

V6GTO

11,579 posts

264 months

Saturday 24th September 2005
quotequote all
And I'd PS it out alltogether! (along with the dust spot top/left)
Nice shot though

Martin.

>> Edited by V6GTO on Saturday 24th September 19:14

GetCarter

30,663 posts

301 months

Saturday 24th September 2005
quotequote all
Like that a lot Ross

KB_S1

5,967 posts

251 months

Saturday 24th September 2005
quotequote all
That is a great shot of what looks like a mint R33.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

270 months

Saturday 24th September 2005
quotequote all
That sir, is a beauty.

LongQ

13,864 posts

255 months

Saturday 24th September 2005
quotequote all
HankScorpio said:
V Nice!

(I would perhaps crop tighter on the left to get rid of the scaffolding and dust, but that is really nit-picking!)



The scaffolding is a bit of a mess but having something there completes the very effective diagonal line of the fence.

Maybe clone the fence and paste that in over the scaffolding?


Cracking shot though - took hours to set up and get right I assume?

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

250 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
shot too me 1/20s to get and I was not even looking through the view finder. just held the camera low down as I hung out the window. luckyshot to be fair lol. dust I have removed in the large image. If I was being picky I would like to see a bit more room infront of the car

LongQ

13,864 posts

255 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
I had this horrible feeling that you were going to say it was a lucky shot.

It would never work for me then ...

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

250 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
could not have got it without the camera being low.

matt (gravy)

1,857 posts

270 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
I think its a strong composition, and well executed, although I think fundamentally its flawed:

There are too many visual elements and colours that draw your eye from the car: Fencing, tyre wall, gravel , grass, adverts, an interesting sky, a building on the left, etc. Its too much for me, which is a shame because these distractions make what could have been a great shot look a bit clumsy. If you had been further to the left of the track and closed in a bit you would have a slightly different but (IMO) stronger image.

Matt

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

250 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
[quote=matt (gravy)]I think its a strong composition, and well executed, although I think fundamentally its flawed:

There are too many visual elements and colours that draw your eye from the car: Fencing, tyre wall, gravel , grass, adverts, an interesting sky, a building on the left, etc. Its too much for me, which is a shame because these distractions make what could have been a great shot look a bit clumsy. If you had been further to the left of the track and closed in a bit you would have a slightly different but (IMO) stronger image.

Matt[/quote]

sadly I did not have a long time to actually take pics so thinking about every last bit of detail for setting up a hot was not possible.

for me the fence at the right and the lack of ground in front of the car is waht makes the shot weak. however to the layman its an impressive shot and thats what counts

HankScorpio

715 posts

259 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
Yeah, cos us laymen know sweet FA about anything. You could put up any old crap and we'd think it was wonderful.

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

250 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
HankScorpio said:
Yeah, cos us laymen know sweet FA about anything. You could put up any old crap and we'd think it was wonderful.


I'd disagree with that

matt (gravy)

1,857 posts

270 months

Sunday 25th September 2005
quotequote all
poah said:
[quote=matt (gravy)]I think its a strong composition, and well executed, although I think fundamentally its flawed:

There are too many visual elements and colours that draw your eye from the car: Fencing, tyre wall, gravel , grass, adverts, an interesting sky, a building on the left, etc. Its too much for me, which is a shame because these distractions make what could have been a great shot look a bit clumsy. If you had been further to the left of the track and closed in a bit you would have a slightly different but (IMO) stronger image.

Matt



sadly I did not have a long time to actually take pics so thinking about every last bit of detail for setting up a hot was not possible.

for me the fence at the right and the lack of ground in front of the car is waht makes the shot weak. however to the layman its an impressive shot and thats what counts[/quote]

Hey,

i think its a good image all things considered.

Matt

bad_roo

5,193 posts

259 months

Monday 26th September 2005
quotequote all
Well done. Knockhill isn't the most photogenic spot on the globe.

poah

Original Poster:

2,142 posts

250 months

Monday 26th September 2005
quotequote all
[quote=matt (gravy)]


Hey,

i think its a good image all things considered.

Matt[/quote]
cheers I reread what I wrote sounded a bit heavy but never ment it to be lol.