National DNA Register
Discussion
I'd gladly let 'em take a swab from me if it helped catch that rapist guy down south.
What's the big problem with this ... lots of crime instantly solved I'd have thought. But I'm not so naive as to believe it would all be this simple ... so what's the catch? Is it an invasion of privacy. Some may think it is, but it wouldn't worry me.
What's the big problem with this ... lots of crime instantly solved I'd have thought. But I'm not so naive as to believe it would all be this simple ... so what's the catch? Is it an invasion of privacy. Some may think it is, but it wouldn't worry me.
This sort of information would not be safe IMHO. The Govt cannot keep the information it has secure and accurate.
What would also concern me is that what would happen if this info was sent to an insurance company 'to prevent fraud' you understand, and then the insurance co refuses your life policy because genetically you may contract cancer or something.
The socialist govt me have now seem a helluva lot more right wing than Mr Heseltine...
What would also concern me is that what would happen if this info was sent to an insurance company 'to prevent fraud' you understand, and then the insurance co refuses your life policy because genetically you may contract cancer or something.
The socialist govt me have now seem a helluva lot more right wing than Mr Heseltine...
I was told by a cop that the idea was put forward to DNA test the whole of the police force in order to be able to eliminate them from crime scene analysis. Apparently the cops rejected the idea as they do not trust the agencies who would do the testing.
Don't know if it's totally true, but a bit worrying for the rest of us.
Don't know if it's totally true, but a bit worrying for the rest of us.
Bonce said: Mistakes happen. Do you really want to run the risk of being hauled before the beak for a heinous crime you didn't commit?
I thought not. Think what an alleged rape or even burglary charge would do to your life.
That is bad enough, but it would NOT be alleged would it. They would have your DNA on file so you are GUILTY
of rape/murder/burglary until such time as they notice they made an error..... very very very dangerous. Your DNA says absolutely everything about you, it could be used by insurances to refuse you cover, your employer to chuck you out because you have some predeliction to some sort of occupational illness etc. etc.
You would be automatically guilty of your DNA matched or supposedly matched. And there's the rub. Fingerprints are supposedly infallible, but it is now in the public domain that there are a few cases where people have been wrongly imprisoned due to (faulty)fingerprint evidence.
If you can mess THAT up, you much easier to mess up something so much more complex as DNA??
Rgds, WalterU
You would be automatically guilty of your DNA matched or supposedly matched. And there's the rub. Fingerprints are supposedly infallible, but it is now in the public domain that there are a few cases where people have been wrongly imprisoned due to (faulty)fingerprint evidence.
If you can mess THAT up, you much easier to mess up something so much more complex as DNA??
Rgds, WalterU
Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





