RE: Porsche Boxster (986) | Spotted
RE: Porsche Boxster (986) | Spotted
Thursday 12th December 2024

Porsche Boxster (986) | Spotted

25 years but only nine thousand miles old, there can't be many better base Boxsters than this one


Even with the really cheap Boxsters mostly gone unless you’re very fortunate - even spares or repairs might now cost £4k - there remains a huge amount of appeal in a Porsche Type 986. We all know why, of course: a sonorous flat-six engine, beautiful mid-engined chassis and a '90s design that arguably looks better than ever have contributed to a recent renewal of its popularity. They were never going to stay the cheap Porsche option for long, not with the future looking as complicated and confusing as it does. That mantle has now been taken on by the Cayenne, and surely looks set to stay that way - £5k Turbos and all… 

As the accessible, vaguely affordable Porsche option, whether new or used, pretty much every Boxster from the past 30 years will have been driven and enjoyed. As an undemanding but extremely rewarding mid-engined sports car, there was always every incentive to get out and make the most of a Boxster whenever possible. It wasn’t really a Sunday best sports car in the way that a 911 might have been. Arguably only the very first 987 Spyders really qualified for occasional use on account of their notoriously fiddly roof. Even a 3.2 S of the first Boxster generation would remain agreeable daily transport in 2024. Get yourself a Porsche Classic infotainment upgrade and away you go. 

All of which makes this 986 a very interesting specimen indeed. Specified from new with the 2.5-litre engine - meaning just the 204hp - the manual gearbox and the lower Sport Chassis, it’s a spec that’s about making the most of the chassis layout. It isn’t spartan, despite NCO Glacier White paint, with options including the centre console, the lovely extended leather and traction control, though it feels like someone chose this to really make the most of a great sports car. If a slightly slow one. Details like a gearknob seemingly straight from a very old 911 show how back to basics things used to be. There doesn’t even appear to be air con.

Yet this Boxster hasn’t even covered 9,000 miles since 1999. Perhaps understandable with an S optioned up to the hilt or one of the very first made, but a real find for a 2.5 - just before the entry-level car was boosted to 2.7 litres as well. It’s all a bit strange, really, and very interesting as a result. Nobody would have thought there’d ever be a 2.5 Boxster museum exhibit, yet here we are. 

Complete with colour-coded hardtop, those wonderful Turbo-style wheels and a beautifully preserved interior, it is a sight to behold. Because there are still nice old Boxsters around, along with plenty of scabby ones, though very few that look quite so immaculate. It won’t have been cooed over like it currently is since the first of five owners took delivery in the last century. Perhaps we’re getting a tad carried away. 

This won’t be the Boxster for the thrill seekers now, because there just isn’t very much power - and it’ll have only five gears, remember. It’s not for those keen on a cheapish example, either, because £15k is being asked. Instead, this is a Boxster that now can be the high days and holidays sports car, one to show off and take to classic car meets as one of the best of the breed. When the weather is suitable again, what a lovely way to spend a weekend that promises to be. 


SPECIFICATION | PORSCHE BOXSTER (986)

Engine: 2,480cc, flat-six
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 204@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 181@4,500rpm
MPG: 29.1
CO2: 239g/km
Year registered: 1999
Recorded mileage: 8,927
Price new: £33,950
Yours for: £15,995

See the full ad

Author
Discussion

GTEYE

Original Poster:

2,473 posts

239 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 12 December 2024 at 07:15

GTEYE

Original Poster:

2,473 posts

239 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
I’m sure someone will be along to say it’s only worth £5,000, but the asking price really isn’t that much in 2024 terms. There can’t be many that are in that condition and mileage.

Maybe not the best colour combo for a Boxster but it’s a time capsule straight back to 1999.

I like it.

bennno

15,237 posts

298 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all

These are generally criminally undervalued and a lovely thing to drive, engines howl, steering really direct, even the typeface on the speedo is iconic. Hated them at the time, brought alternatives, but think they are just on the cusp of becoming a collectible classic that will appreciate.

I’d be tempted given the provenance of this one and the main dealer history, but the terracotta interior with white combo is an immediate no no.

Earthdweller

19,306 posts

155 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
The base models are often the purest versions

I don't think I've ever seen a white early boxter, I wonder if that will be make it more desirable like with the Z4 where colours they didn't sell as new in numbers are now the most sought after

The really odd thing for me though is five people bought a base model car and all decided not to use it, most of these ultra low mileage cars seem to be one owner

Turbobanana

8,357 posts

230 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
Love the interior, hate the UNPROFOR White exterior.

I'll be in the market for something like this in the new year but this one's too nice really. It's also been on the market quite a while.

PH articles often carry an irritating tone of "not enough": only 204bhp, only 5 gears, it'll be slow, no air con (in an open car). Stuff needs to evolve, get better with time. Just because everyone's shopping car now has more power than this doesn’t make it inadequate.

Motormouth88

782 posts

89 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
Rancid all round

86wasagoodyear

968 posts

125 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
This is top mechanical spec Boxster for me, precisely because it is relatively slow & therefore best suited to conditions today. The 2.5 had a shorter final drive than later 2.7 & 3.2, so this car won't suffer from over-long gearing. Easier access to the top of the rev range. Smiles all round, at not-too-silly speeds, still able to cross Europe no bother. I'd have a 2.5 in a heartbeat if I had a spare garage.

Magikarp

1,749 posts

77 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
I really like this. There are certain details that really age it, and I like it more for that.

Kipsrs

705 posts

78 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Rancid all round
Unless you’ve driven an early Boxster!
Granted not a great colour combo but what is great is the drive. . .

Venisonpie

4,816 posts

111 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
Looks like a pile of seagull sh!t.

Latifisnc

1,529 posts

121 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
I’m sure someone will be along to say it’s only worth £5,000, but the asking price really isn’t that much in 2024 terms. There can’t be many that are in that condition and mileage.

Maybe not the best colour combo for a Boxster but it’s a time capsule straight back to 1999.

I like it.
Agreed, given the prices that seem to be asked for an awful lot of late 90s early 00s cars, this doesn't seem crazy (colour aside).

WPA

14,664 posts

143 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
Not the best colour but base spec is ace and lets be honest in this crazy world £15k is not a lot to ask pricewise.

Hairymonster

1,675 posts

134 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
Maybe like the early Mazda MX5's, this base spec model will encourage users to have fun at speeds less than those that'll attract a driving ban. 200+bhp in something this light will be plenty fast enough to get you into trouble, though the chassis should mean you'll stay the right side of an accident.

The colour wouldn't worry me - i think this is pure undistilled driving fun. I wish I had the cash and somewhere to keep it!

TameRacingDriver

20,561 posts

301 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
I like this one. I've had a couple of 3.2 Boxsters but if I was buying again I'd have the 2.5. The gearing is shorter on the 2.5 which is better for enjoying on British B roads, yes it's not particularly fast but here's the thing, I didn't think the 3.2 was very fast either, but that had stupid tall gearing, and the 2.5 is more robust and cheaper to fix when it does go wrong.

A 3.2 with similar gearing to the 2.5 would be the sweet spot but it doesn't exist unless you want to pay more than the car is worth to make it happen.

Not a fan of the hard top though, makes for quite an awkward, ugly looking car with it fitted. Probably a good investment for winter though given how these things leak.

dinkel

27,778 posts

287 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
bennno said:
These are generally criminally undervalued and a lovely thing to drive, engines howl, steering really direct, even the typeface on the speedo is iconic.
Absolute gems then and now still.

When everybody looked - looks! - for the hi power versions everything well set-up (and light) with 150 to 250 ps will be a thrill to drive.

Really? Really!

Afsheen-fhb6i

12 posts

40 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
Porsche inspection for circa £300, £5k down and £150 pm. Budget £2k pa for running costs/maintenance. A rare, modern classic to use on country drives and wont lose any money. No-brainer as long as you can deal with the white...

Howard-lnuh7

1 posts

131 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
I have been sitting on a 2002 Boxster S with 16k miles and feel guilty when I use it as it feels wrong adding to the mileage, might explain the very low miles.

GreatScott2016

2,508 posts

117 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
I have no issue with older and “lower” powered models in general, but in Boxster guise, I think it looks dreadful, particularly the side profile. It may be a good steer, but I would not want to be seen in that, probably why the mileage is so low. I get that Boxster lovers will love it, but it’s not for me smile

bennno

15,237 posts

298 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
GreatScott2016 said:
I have no issue with older and “lower” powered models in general, but in Boxster guise, I think it looks dreadful, particularly the side profile. It may be a good steer, but I would not want to be seen in that, probably why the mileage is so low. I get that Boxster lovers will love it, but it’s not for me smile
To be fair its exactly that attitude that has kept the prices so low, its a poor mans porsche etc etc, so many missing out that they are incredibly cheap for something with a turbine like engine, really direct steering and plenty of performance to use on the road.

These drive superbly, if it had been silver even with with that interior I suspect id have been on the phone already this morning.

Mysstree

547 posts

75 months

Thursday 12th December 2024
quotequote all
No service history between June 2001 (1,715 miles) and June 2016 (4,740 miles), both at Porsche Colchester.
Has it been sitting around most of that time? Like to see the MOT record.