RE: Jaguar X-Type V6 Estate | Shed of the Week
RE: Jaguar X-Type V6 Estate | Shed of the Week
Friday 13th December 2024

Jaguar X-Type V6 Estate | Shed of the Week

Jaguar's period under Ford ownership is two decades it doesn't like to remember - but Shed does


In early 2018 Shed brought you a 2001 Jaguar X-Type 3.0 Sport saloon. The 228hp V6 motor used by Jaguar in that car made it a potent performer that only needed six point something seconds for the 0-60. Coincidentally, that’s all the time Shed needs for his dalliances with the postmistress. He can’t remember the last time he experienced six point secs but it might have been with that circus contortionist who chugged into his workshop in an ailing Alfa 147 GTA. 

Whatever, he does know that even today, well over 20 years after the X-Type first hoved into view, this 3 Series rival remains an appealing prospect when it’s in the right spec, i.e. with the 3.0-litre V6 which gave you 35hp more go than the 2.5 V6 but more or less the same fuel consumption (27mpg instead of 29mpg), and as an estate, a body shape that came along in 2004 as Ian Callum’s first design for Jaguar. With all-wheel drive and a posh mini-Jag interior these were capable as well as comfortable and clean-cut chariots. 

The one you’re looking at here is a late example, registered in September 2007. That makes it one of the last pre-facelift Xs, which is no bad thing because the refreshed ones weren’t anywhere near as classy as the old ones, having had all their chrome stripped off and a pair of blobby bodycoloured bumper panels bunged on. 

Many thought the earlier cars were better in other ways too. The five-speed Jatco autos (as also used on Mondeos, Galaxies, Mk 1 Freelanders and various Volkswagens) were a bit more troublesome than the considerably rarer five-speed 3.0 manuals, which in Sport- and Sovereign-spec X saloons were half a second quicker than the autos. The Estates were a little heavier than the four-doors, adding 0.3 seconds to the 0-60 time in manual cars (6.9) and 0.2 seconds to the autos. In the interests of longevity, smarter owners of 3.0 autos learned not to pay any attention to Jaguar’s ‘sealed for life transmission’ boast. 

It’s just a question of how long you can expect, or hope for, your X-Type to last. That 2001 saloon we mentioned at the start had 86,000 miles on it when Shed laid his crusty old eyes on it. He noted some rust on the MOT history back then, but it still valiantly managed another 20,000 miles over the next seven years before failing what looks like being its final test just a couple of months ago with a list of rust issues long enough to consign it (by Shed’s guess) to the great scrapyard in the sky.

Today’s X is different. It’s just whizzed through the MOT at 119,000 miles with a clean pass, which most of its tests have had apart from the odd small brake fluid or coolant leak or cracked tyre. All this, plus an opening rear window, for under £1,500. You can’t complain at that, although some probably will. 

You do have to watch the fluid level in the transfer box on these as there’s not a lot of it in there and the difference between Not A Lot and Not A Lot Minus A Bit can be catastrophic. Drivers’ seats got wobbly on their mounts but there was a mod you could do to take the nautical element out of the ride. Other than that you were good to go. So what if Euro NCAP said that the airbag didn’t stop the driver’s head from hitting the wheel in a crash? If you believed the boozy golf club stereotype of the X-Type driver they probably wouldn’t have noticed anyway. And who cared about Euro NCAP’s description of the X-Type’s pedestrian impact performance as ‘dire’? As any X-Type driver will tell you, pedestrians shouldn’t be on the road in the first place. 

In commercial terms, the X-Type was a failure. Jaguar was hoping to flog a hundred thousand of them every year. In the end (2009) they averaged just under half that, adding up to 350,000 or so over the eight-year run. Doesn’t sound so bad for a failure or for a car that, according to Ian Callum, was designed in Detroit and then handed over to tongue-biting Jaguar engineers in Whitley to sort out. 

They do go though. Here’s an overseas dude giving his manual 3.0 some serious grief through what, in part at least, looks suspiciously like a built-up area. He pauses only to give it a quick wash (?) before shooting off again. Wonder if he’s still around? At these speeds, possibly not.


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

tomsugden

Original Poster:

2,467 posts

257 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Interesting shed, I love a Jaaaaag.

tmhsg

41 posts

252 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Always liked the look of these but never pressed the button, Great Shed, back seats down, post mistress in the boot !!!.

BeastieBoy73

813 posts

141 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Always hated Jaguars and, despite me nearing 52 years on the planet, have always considered myself to young to drive one but now I see what’s become of them I feel I may have been a bit mean.

Still don’t want one, though.

FlukePlay

1,189 posts

174 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
If you wrap this in pink or baby blue would it then appeal to the new Jaguar target market thus expanding sales potential?

GianiCakes

680 posts

102 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
A set of All Seasons and you’ve got a great go anywhere winter car. Perhaps even a tow car?

el romeral

2,155 posts

166 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
A touch of class with this Jag shed. Estate body and 3 liter engine, definitely the pick of the range. The circus contortionist reference was hilarious.

molineux1980

1,278 posts

248 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
I quite like that as a an mtb wagon. Strokes chin thoughtfully.....

Billy_Whizzzz

2,620 posts

172 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Wow. That interior is truly repulsive.

Picanto_superleggera

176 posts

40 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Call me suspicious, but all of the photos show the driver's window open. Is that because it doesn't close, or because something has died inside?

GianiCakes

680 posts

102 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Picanto_superleggera said:
Call me suspicious, but all of the photos show the driver's window open. Is that because it doesn't close, or because something has died inside?
BMW will charge you for that as the “Smoker’s Package”

Gibbler290

718 posts

124 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
These looked great in the sporty trim with large wheels but less so in this spec….especially with the interior

T1berious

2,669 posts

184 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Billy_Whizzzz said:
Wow. That interior is truly repulsive.
You know, we moan about modern car interiors being these monochrome horrors...

Now, after seeing this... I'm not so sure....

Couldn't imagine getting into that, yikes.

A.Norton

852 posts

66 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
I had the use of one for a few months as a company pool car years ago, it was the fleet managers worse car always back in for repairs..

I hated having to use it and time has not been kind...




PartTimeShedMan

10 posts

125 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
No mention of the road tax then? Or did I miss it… £710 a year - the shed killer

POIDH

3,728 posts

94 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
I'm not sure I own a pair of beige chinos or a golf sweater to go with that interior....

I like, but suspect the real world mpg and VED might be a tad ruinous...

dralig

22 posts

28 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
A very tidy looking car which will do well for someone, just not me. I’m not an ‘old Jag’ person, being one of the very few who’s looking forward to the new jaGs

vdn

9,313 posts

232 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
GianiCakes said:
Picanto_superleggera said:
Call me suspicious, but all of the photos show the driver's window open. Is that because it doesn't close, or because something has died inside?
BMW will charge you for that as the “Smoker’s Package”
hehe

WPA

14,664 posts

143 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
One one hand a good shed and winter transport however interior is horrid, RFL is in the highest bracket.

Also from what I understand these rust really badly in the sills


dunnoreally

1,356 posts

137 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
I had an X Type when I was on my early to mid 20s. It was a 2.5 auto saloon in BRG which I bought for what is now shed money fully expecting "Mondeo, not a proper Jag" type reactions, but it actually used to get a lot of comments. It was also pretty reliable for a couple of years, until it needed some major tinworm treatment which I couldn't justify, and by that point it didn't owe me anything. It was also as comfortable as you'd expect and, while it no sports car, was better to drive than you might think (although IIRC reviews when it released were very complimentary on that front). I originally bought it just because it was one of the few vaguely interesting things in I could afford at the time but I went on to really bond with that car.

Interior was very similar to this one but without the wooden steering wheel. Acquired taste maybe but I rather liked it.

Would I have another? Right now there wouldn't be much point because I like my current car, but there are lots of nominally better things I'd have an X over for sure.

Edited by dunnoreally on Friday 13th December 08:20

FrankandLynn

92 posts

22 months

Friday 13th December 2024
quotequote all
Perfect for the older chap who just wants to get up the allotment and back.