RE: Vauxhall Vectra V6 Turbo Elite | Shed of the Week
RE: Vauxhall Vectra V6 Turbo Elite | Shed of the Week
Friday 10th January 2025

Vauxhall Vectra V6 Turbo Elite | Shed of the Week

We dare you


Let’s get straight into this week’s Shed, a Vauxhall Vectra from the last Vectra range to be sold in Europe, the ‘C’, which ran from 2002 to 2008. A what, you screech? A Vectra? Ah yes, but not any old Vectra. This is a 2.8i V6 Turbo Elite powered by the Holden/Saab/Cadillac/Alfa/Cuthbert Dibble & Screw turbocharged 2.8-litre 60-degree HFV6 ‘High Feature’ engine, No, Shed doesn’t know why they called it the High Feature engine. Do you? All suggestions, informed or crackpot, to the forum please. 

What Shed does know is that post-2005 facelift cars like our 2007 example had 247hp at 5,500rpm and 258lb ft of torque from 1,800 to 4,500rpm. Running through a 6-speed automatic box, those outputs gave the 1,560kg V6 Turbo Elite a top speed of 155mph and a 0-62mph time of 7.8 seconds. Good numbers you must admit. The same engine delivered 276hp in the VXR Vectra which, unlike the Elite, could be had with a manual gearbox. That wasn’t as massive an advantage for the VXR as you might think because the Elite’s auto was not only smooth but also surprisingly willing for a torque converter. Its only option was a ‘snow’ button so there was no confusion arising from a raft of modes not everybody understood let alone selected. 

Remaps could take the engine well beyond 300hp but most V6 Turbo Elite owners were perfectly happy with the standard setup which gave strong, linear performance and the possibility at least of real-world cruising fuel consumption figures in the low 30s. They would probably admit that the Vectra C’s handling, though improved over earlier iterations, still wasn’t on a par with the Mondeo’s. Nevertheless it was more than good enough for British roads and there was plenty of other stuff to admire in this big-hearted option. 

Not only was it a refined car, it was also roomy with a huge, well-shaped boot. The plastics and the info screen will look horribly dated to anyone expecting premium 2025-style quality in a mainstream motor from 20 years earlier but the seats were comfy and, in Elite trim, upholstered in leather. Sometimes this was coloured beige with a matching Caramac dash, a mix that could conceivably have looked nice with our shed’s blue paint but black moo did save you from the nasty brown Wood-u-Like stuff that jarred your eyes in the beiged-up models. Elite spec also included an electric sunroof, usefully future-proofing the car for the possible arrival of electric suns. 

Is Shed the only one who thinks that these late-model, high-spec Vectra Cs are starting to look quite good? The Insignia that elbowed it aside was styled more voluptuously to distance it from the accusations of tedium that had been made about the Vectra by well-known media figures - or one in particular anyway - but the Vectra C’s combination of flattish panels, an arcing roofline and chunky 18-inch alloys has a pleasing solidity about it. Shed reckons this particular Vectra was somebody’s pride and joy from new. Just 35,000 miles were covered in the first ten years of its life and even now, after 18 years, its odometer is yet to click into six-figure territory.

The downside of shed life in the mid-2020s is that anything with vaguely decent power and torque is going to hit UK buyers hard on vehicle duty. Sure enough, this 262g/km car dings the bell at the top of the fairground test your strength machine with a score of £735pa. In addition to that, there’s an odd, as opposed to normal, elephant in the room. 

Normally it’s us punters who are supposed to wield the bargepoles, but in this case it looks like you’ll have to get past the dealer’s one first in order to do a deal on this car. We’re used to seeing disclaimers in ads, but this ad is basically one big disclaimer. Shed’s knowledge of retail law is every bit as comprehensive as his knowledge of importing cars from Northern Ireland, i.e. not very (see last week’s MG ZT story for confirmation) so you lot will have to have your own discussion on what dealers can or can’t legally do in regards to returns, refunds, guarantees and warranties. Shed’s only contribution is to wonder what the big problem might be. The current MOT (which runs to the end of May) reported nothing more than a blown rear plate bulb and some wear to the inner edges of the front tyres. Windscreen damage, a rusty exhaust and two broken front springs have all been expeditiously sorted in previous years. Other than that it’s been a simple tale of consumables. 

Does this model have a disastrous inbuilt fault waiting to pounce? Not as far as Shed is aware. PCV valves on the rear bank can get overfaced by the amount of air going past, and timing chains can stretch. The parking sensors and cruise control had a reputation for being a bit patchy, as did the fuel gauge, although sometimes the needle really was dropping that fast if you were enjoying yourself. Changing the rear spark plugs wasn’t easy, causing occasional tech ‘forgetfulness’ during services. You would need to keep an eye on your oil levels and specs but that’s general advice really. The splitting coolant header tanks that were a very engine-specific issue with the 2.8 were the subject of a recall so you should be OK on that score.

So there we have it, a puerility-free guide to a serious and sensible (apart from the tax and, depending on how you drive, maybe the fuel) motor car. If you can see past the tax thing – and many can by offsetting lower purchase prices against the higher tax costs – the V6 Turbo Elite will surely have some appeal for a fast barge-wafter with £1,949 in their pocket. What could go wrong, apart from your mates having a go at you for buying a Vectra?


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

Turini

Original Poster:

474 posts

195 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
No

Lo-Fi

1,290 posts

99 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Nevermind the tax bill, look at the size of the gearstick!

I don't have a problem with Vectras, or even Vauxhall itself, so for £2700 all in, that's not a bad offering. Apart from the off-putting ad. Giving a dealer like that money would hurt a bit. Just encourages them.

Billy_Whizzzz

2,620 posts

172 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Cue all those being outraged that for less than £2k the dealer has the cheek not to offer 12 months warranty on a 20 year old Vauxhall.

Faffmeister

33 posts

134 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
In defence of handling punters at this end of the market, I can understand the tone of the ad.

However

'CASH ONLY' hmmmmmmm

newbie101

53 posts

139 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Faffmeister said:
In defence of handling punters at this end of the market, I can understand the tone of the ad.

However

'CASH ONLY' hmmmmmmm
Doesn’t want any credit card charge backs to worry about? That’s my best guess given the preceding warning.

Puddenchucker

5,840 posts

247 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
newbie101 said:
Faffmeister said:
In defence of handling punters at this end of the market, I can understand the tone of the ad.

However

'CASH ONLY' hmmmmmmm
Doesn’t want any credit card charge backs to worry about? That’s my best guess given the preceding warning.
What about Debit Card, Bank Transfer or even the good old fashioned cheque?
It does appear that the dealer wants to minimise any chance of, or make it awkward for, a buyer rejecting the car if/when something breaks.

howardhughes

1,406 posts

233 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Well, I never knew they made these. Not for me, though.

Cambs_Stuart

3,530 posts

113 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Disappointing lack of puerile humour. As for the car it's thirsty,slow and not terribly fun. Which makes it sound like my work colleagues.

911Spanker

3,640 posts

45 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
I like the Vectra but probably the wrong engine and gearbox combination.

Turbobanana

8,351 posts

230 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Cambs_Stuart said:
Disappointing lack of puerile humour. As for the car it's thirsty,slow and not terribly fun. Which makes it sound like my work colleagues.
Agree for the most part, but when (apart from the review of a Bugatti Veyron) does "...a top speed of 155mph and a 0-62mph time of 7.8 seconds" constitute being slow?

yme402

655 posts

131 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
I am guessing we have a different correspondant this week as there are no references to Shed?

Groaver

83 posts

62 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
"The plastics and the info screen will look horribly dated to anyone expecting premium 2025-style quality in a mainstream motor"

The trouble is, those plastics were horrible back then.
Vauxhalls then always had a dull dashboard.

username_checksout

539 posts

29 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
I may well be wrong but I don’t think this engine was used in any Alfa of the time. Do these engines suffer from timing chain stretch?

I’m not sure I’d feel the thrill in paying top dollar in running costs to waft around in a thirsty, torquey, old, silver Vauxhall. It doesn’t set the heart racing on any level.

LE62NDE

512 posts

49 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Surely the elephant in the room (car?) is that it is being sold as a non-runner and that the dealer hasn't tested it. Would a test drive (or even a start of the engine) be allowed?

Walk away, Renée.

Earthdweller

19,302 posts

155 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
We had a load of these Vectra's at work, albeit a bit of a weird hybrid spec with the VXR engine, manual gearbox and basic interior, missing things like electric rear windows (more of that in a moment)

They were very quick, handled very well and were surprisngly reliable. There was a lot of tale about them being very sensitive to oil levels at the time but I don't recall any issues

Anyway back to lack of rear electric windows. I managed to persuade my boss to allow me to "steal" two of the batch and convert the rear of them for a very specific purpose without telling the fleet manager. However it needed electric rear windows to be fitted which turned into a right ball ache as the cars had a completely different wiring loom so it wasn't just plug and play

But it worked eventually and we presented the completed converted cars to the fleet manager at the workshops whose jaw dropped as to what we had done to two brand new cars, but he couldn't really say anything

The cars proved brilliant in use and quickly became quite feared by a certain type ...


S600BSB

8,346 posts

135 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
Vehicle sold as a non runner.. No.

Wren-went

1,062 posts

67 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
A lot of car for the money had the same engine in an 06 Saab 9-3 Aero Convertible. Not a minutes trouble thank god years ago I didn't pay over £700 Road tax

Fairy positive if it was a manual the tax would a lot less. It's the tax that's putting a lot of buying this type of car sadly.


Angelo1985

796 posts

55 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
I wouldn’t normally care about what that celebrity says about an old Vauxhall (or about farming), but these were boring cars when new and they aren’t any better now. The restyled ones look like had their back and front designed by 2 different teams in different continents, the dash has always been one of the ugliest in the market and this is not the estate…

the-norseman

15,753 posts

200 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
username_checksout said:
I may well be wrong but I don’t think this engine was used in any Alfa of the time.
Nope I dont think they were either, Alfa had the Busso and the GM 3.2

I had this engine 2.8 V6 250PS in my SAAB with Hirsch tune to 275PS, was a really smooth engine.

Motormouth88

782 posts

89 months

Friday 10th January 2025
quotequote all
This car is a phenomenon