RE: Delightful, fast-disappearing Ford Puma for sale
RE: Delightful, fast-disappearing Ford Puma for sale
Thursday 23rd January 2025

Delightful, fast-disappearing Ford Puma for sale

You could buy something very safe and reliable for a first car. Or you could have this...


Does the appeal of a Ford Puma even need explaining in 2025? The latest version, sure - compact SUVs have proliferated like the proverbial bunny in the last ten years and you’d be forgiven for needing help choosing one (hint: don’t). But the old Puma, as slippery as a glass slipper and never to be repeated in your lifetime, surely sells itself - especially in box-fresh format and having only just notched up five figures on the odometer. 

Granted, in this case, it’s the wrong engine. The 1.4-litre donkey came with 16 valves, but it was very much the entry-level option and therefore short on power versus the 1.7-litre VCT unit, which delivered up to 155hp in Ford Racing format. The 1.4 has maybe 90hp and needs the best part of 11 seconds to arrive at the national limit. We’re just guessing, but possibly it’s the identity of the engine that has caused the vendor to knock 500 quid off the asking price. 

Even at £7,990, you might argue this Puma is on the steep side - this is a model with several Shed appearances already under its belt, after all. But comparative rarity (howmanyleft suggests that there are fewer than 100 examples of the 1.4-litre car still registered in the UK) has helped to solidify prices somewhat, especially if the car in question looks nowhere near its 30th birthday. Then they go back the other way, presumably trying to snare someone who was skint and irredeemably spotty when the Puma was new. 

PH will admit to fitting this bill. At 18 in 1998, buying this Radial Red car would’ve been about as feasible as dating Denise van Outen. But contemporary knowledge of the Puma isn’t really necessary because surely all you really need in 2025 is a working set of eyes and ears. The first to admire the finesse of the New Edge-influenced design, which turned the dour Mk4 Fiesta into a genuinely pretty coupe; the second to appreciate the sound of petrol being turned into fun. 

This returns us to the question of appeal and it being virtually undeniable. The back-to-basics thrill of affordable motoring used to be all around us, like cigarette smoke in a pub. Now, like cigarette smoke in any indoor setting, it’s virtually non-existent. Small cars today are put together with materials and tolerances that would doubtless seem remarkable to a Cologne line worker in the late ‘90s - but build quality and safety and refinement do not a thrilling car make. 

Truthfully, the lowliest Puma was probably short on grown-up thrills, too - although when a car weighs little more than a tonne and features a well-sorted front-drive chassis, there’s plenty of adolescent fun to be had. On the basis that it’s only covered 14k in 27 years, we’re guessing this Puma’s previous owners didn’t go in for all that - but they did go in for main dealer servicing because apparently it’s got ten stamps and even the original brochure. It ought to make the perfect runaround for someone. Ideally, someone skint and spotty who would really appreciate it. 


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

Bencolem

Original Poster:

1,183 posts

268 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
£8k for that? I think I’d rather Puma pants.

Porker2004

22 posts

97 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I get it ….. I get it ….. where do you find another and so someone will pony up but it’s just not special enough to be collectable and as a daily there are better ways to spend 8k in my view. The 1.7 was a real hoot however, but shed I think 125BHP not 155BHP although maybe you refer to the FRP which might have been around that. Anyway someone will love it just not me 😀

TREMAiNE

4,164 posts

178 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Bencolem said:
£8k for that? I think I’d rather Puma pants.
hehe

Lo-Fi

1,290 posts

99 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Porker2004 said:
I get it ….. I get it ….. where do you find another and so someone will pony up but it’s just not special enough to be collectable and as a daily there are better ways to spend 8k in my view. The 1.7 was a real hoot however, but shed I think 125BHP not 155BHP although maybe you refer to the FRP which might have been around that. Anyway someone will love it just not me ??
Yeah, the article does actually say about the racing one being 155...

Turbobanana

8,347 posts

230 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Great fun cars, even the 1.4. My 17 year old son would love it, but it's more than I'd be willing to pay for his first car. It's probably "too nice".

FNG

4,742 posts

253 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I got a 1.7 a few years ago purely on the number of people who raved about them.

Disappointing. Not agile enough, not powerful enough, crap driving position.

One of those cars that the collective raves about but massively under delivered, for me.

8k for the 1.4? Ha ha ha.

wistec1

794 posts

70 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I'd rather be riding Denise-Van-Outen than riding in this.

Lincsls1

4,070 posts

169 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
14k miles! Its a new car.
Knock it down a grand or two for me.

Dino550

255 posts

248 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I had a 1.7 as a temporary company car many years ago. It was a hoot to drive. A little go cart with an eager engine and nice gear change.

I was sad to hand it back when my Alfa GTV arrived.

Andy86GT

1,147 posts

94 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Good enough for the king of cool ...


cerb4.5lee

44,498 posts

209 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I've always wanted one of these(well the 1.7 version anyway), and I had a test drive booked in a new one back in 1997, but something came up meaning that I couldn't make it. I still feel like I missed out even now.

I fell in love with the way they looked at the time, and I'm a big Ford fan anyway, so one of these seemed ideal to me for sure. Maybe one day?

nammynake

2,658 posts

202 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Way Way overpriced even with the low miles.

dunnoreally

1,356 posts

137 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
I had a 1.4 Puma as my first car! Difference is mine was £700.

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
wistec1 said:
I'd rather be riding Denise-Van-Outen than riding in this.
Surely we could apply that test to most SOTW choices? I mean, who doesn't love a big breakfast...

Motormouth88

782 posts

89 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
8k for a first car hahaha, what are you smoking PH?

cerb4.5lee

44,498 posts

209 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
8k for a first car hahaha, what are you smoking PH?
Hyundai's cost £60k nowadays, so I don't think PH are too far off the mark in fairness. biggrin

WPA

14,657 posts

143 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Even with the low miles that is a £4k car at best especially knowing how badly these rust.

Nearly purchased a 1.7 one many years ago for £1500 was not that great to drive so gave it a miss.

TIGA84

5,584 posts

260 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Funnily enough, at 18, in 1998, I bought one. Sadly Denise Van Outen didn't materialise.

R837CMV where are you now.............


andy43

13,174 posts

283 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
8 grand?
1.7 here in a decent blue with 26,000 miles - 5 grand.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/276789242910?_skw=ford+...


GreatScott2016

2,507 posts

117 months

Thursday 23rd January 2025
quotequote all
Great to see such a lovely unmolested example even if the price is a tad rich in my view smile. I have always thought these did look a bit odd though, particularly in profile. They sit way too high, at least to my eyes. That said, what a lovely thing.