RE: One-of-24 RHD Grand Cherokee Trackhawk for sale
RE: One-of-24 RHD Grand Cherokee Trackhawk for sale
Wednesday 29th January

One-of-24 RHD Grand Cherokee Trackhawk for sale

A 717hp V8 SUV didn't make much sense six years ago. Now it seems right on message...


You know why performance SUVs get a bad rep among enthusiasts? It’s because they take themselves far too seriously. (Well, that and their preposterous weight and size.) Remember when Porsche sprinkled some GT magic on the Cayenne Turbo? Or the first time BMW slapped an M badge on the X5? Sure, they and many others defied physics to bring fast fun to the whole family - but maybe they would've been better received if they didn’t try so hard to garner the respect of the track day crowd.

Something’s got to be working, though, with demand so stratospherically high manufacturers can barely keep up. But if were up to me (and thankfully it isn’t), there’d be a whole lot more super SUVs like this Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk. And while it may have been positioned as a track-honed family bus (the clue being in the name), the reality is that much of Jeep’s attention was spent on making as fast as a supercar in a straight line, and worrying about the bits that make it good in the corners once the development budget had all but dried up.

Needless to say, rapid SUVs had been around long before the Trackhawk’s arrival in 2018 - including from Jeep itself with the 477hp Grand Cherokee SRT - but even by today’s standards, the flagship is an absolute lunatic. You’re looking at a five-seater, 2,433kg off-roader (I know that’s a bit of a stretch) that’s packing a gargantuan 717hp and a 645lb ft of torque. Those felt like ridiculous numbers back then, and only a handful of high-powered high riders have beaten it since. And to rub salt into the wound, Jeep didn’t have to try all that hard to reach such heady numbers. It simply plucked the 6.2-litre supercharged Hemi V8 from the Dodge Challenger Hellcat, dropped it in the Cherokee and called it a day. 

Of course, dumping big V8s into anything that moves is the bedrock of the American performance car industry, and there’s no denying it worked a treat. Acceleration was ferocious, hitting 62mph from a standstill in a mere 3.7 seconds and it could complete a quarter mile in only 11.6 seconds. Matt Bird drove one back in 2019 and said the Trackhawk delivered its power with “violence and force”, with the combination of immense traction, weight and grunt creating a “sense of the world around being consumed by the car and its power”. He also said it sounded “awesome”, which isn’t hard to believe.

Don’t think of it as a one-trick pony, either. The Trackhawk earned itself adjustable dampers with multiple modes to flick between, though the consensus is that you’re essentially choosing between ‘very firm’ and 'extremely firm.’ That was all in the name of keeping just shy of 2.5 tonnes in check, as were those massive (and supposedly highly effective) brakes. So no, it’s not a sophisticated car, but that’s why we love cars like the Trackhawk. And while it made little sense back then, it arguably makes a bit more sense now given how many manufacturers have followed in its tyre treads.

Surprisingly, Jeep went to the effort of homologating the Trackhawk for right-hand-drive markets, though less surprising is the fact it only sold 24 of them. This is one of them, having been bought in 2019 by presumably a complete legend and driven 41,000 miles over six years. It’s got a full service history and a couple of minor upgrades, including aftermarket Vossen wheels and a carbon inbox. Oh, and carbon gel plates. Might want to move those on when you get the keys. And while it ain’t cheap at £79,995, it’s a good £10k cheaper than it was new and far less expensive than buying an Aston Martin DBX707 or Lamborghini Urus S with similar power. Having said that, this Jaguar F-Pace SVR 1988 edition is a mighty tempting alternative. Shame it’s a bit down on power…


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

GM182

Original Poster:

1,383 posts

241 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Mad, bad and dangerous to know. I like it. Would still take a Jag F-Pace SVR or indeed RRS SVR ahead of it though. Some supercharger tweaks could get the power levels into the 600+ range on those if they felt a bit limp by comparison.

Seano1878

87 posts

44 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
I saw one of these in Chorlton the other day, looked and sounded awesome, didn’t realise how rare they were as I’ve seen three RHD trackhawks now.

Orchardab

613 posts

142 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
I could shift some potatoes in that.

CountyAFC

3,200 posts

19 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Done 40k miles and he wants £80,000 for it.

Joker.

wistec1

633 posts

57 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Big money for a big rare car. Only time I've seen one was in Spain and I heard it long before spotted it.

Konan

2,085 posts

162 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Yup, I'd take one for the pure amusement and just acknowledge half the world thinks I'm a Pratt.

I'd also say 'yeeee hawww' every time I put my foot down.

HazzaT

544 posts

61 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Amazing engine, but I'd still rather have it in the Challenger or Charger.

Is this the only way to get the Hellcat lump in a RHD car?

bigyoungdave

270 posts

43 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Cool car. But I wouldn't buy a car with gel plates as it makes me think the car has probably been mistreated in other ways as well

Konan

2,085 posts

162 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
bigyoungdave said:
Cool car. But I wouldn't buy a car with gel plates as it makes me think the car has probably been mistreated in other ways as well
There are certain things that will always put me off in an advert, but I think the worst thing for me is when there's a shot of the dash and the radio is set to Heart FM. wink

MDMA .

9,613 posts

117 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
bigyoungdave said:
Cool car. But I wouldn't buy a car with gel plates as it makes me think the car has probably been mistreated in other ways as well
Maybe it should have been posted here instead.

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

theicemario

1,229 posts

91 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Challenger Hellcat not heavy and un-aerodynamic enough for you?

Step this way

AmazingGrace

213 posts

20 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Also, why do some dealers screendump every single feature of a car into the advert? No one ever reads that gumpf.

WPA

12,134 posts

130 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
£80k for that seems punchy when you could buy a Jaguar F-Pace SVR for less money

smilo996

3,415 posts

186 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
A 717hp V8 SUV didn't make much sense six years ago. Now it seems just as pointless now. Carriers of massive but fragile egos.

C5_Steve

6,005 posts

119 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
smilo996 said:
A 717hp V8 SUV didn't make much sense six years ago. Now it seems just as pointless now. Carriers of massive but fragile egos.
I've always found this opinion strange when talking about cars like this. Unlike much more exotic things, these look basically bog standard to anyone who's not a petrol head. Even if you do know what one is it's easier to miss them (if you don't hear it running). I've always thought owners of something like this (or the old SRT8 Jeeps) are in it for their own amusement. If they wanted to protect their ego they'd by a Range Rover Sport surely?

Anyway, probably not a better way to go this fast in this much comfort with as big a grin in your face and a soundtrack from the gods. Seems a bargain when you look at how much Hellcats are and how much more useable this is.

cirks

2,514 posts

299 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Owned one for 3 years (sold when I started using the 928 as a daily just over 3 years ago). Practical, comfortable, cheap to service (service plan was circa £300 per 6000 miles) stupidly fast and pretty solidly built. Would I have another one? No, even though everyone I know wonders why I didn't keep it. Reasons were quite simple really though - the 928 is more engaging to drive, doesn't need to have 700BHP to be fun, doesn't average 14mpg over 20000 miles like the Trackhawk. Would I have one over an SVR? Most definitely. Having had a RR (L322 which I thought was great), the Trackhawk at least was reliable and is miles cheaper to service and maintain (unless you get prices for brake pads from Jeep!)
As for prices - there are so few of them around, they'll sell for what someone's willing to pay. I got a good deal from a dealer (not the one I bought mine from) so lost circa 15% in 3 years and 22K miles. They've since been advertised from anywhere in 70s to mid 90s. What they've sold for is anyone's guess.
Mine was black - don't particularly like this red but at least it's different


Stroudy1

73 posts

76 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
I saw one of these blow up last year after a few hot laps around Castle Combe..

prand

6,216 posts

212 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Orchardab said:
I could shift some potatoes in that.
I found the boot disappointingly small in my (diesel) GK. Went back to an audi a6 avant. Then again for this particular variant, shifting big loads of kids stuff and camping gear isn't going to be the primary purpose. It's a shame as they are very handsome cars!

Motormouth88

618 posts

76 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
I hate myself for it but I live that, even when you know the interior quality will be akin to sitting inside a plastic bag

ChocolateFrog

32,210 posts

189 months

Wednesday 29th January
quotequote all
Owner trying to recoup some of the fuel bill from the last 40000 miles.

Somewhere between 16 and 17 grand just in petrol.