RE: Aston Martin CEO confirms imminent job cuts
RE: Aston Martin CEO confirms imminent job cuts
Thursday 27th February 2025

Aston Martin CEO confirms imminent job cuts

Up to 170 employees will go as part of a new cost-cutting measure


Aston Martin CEO Adrian Hallmark has confirmed that around 170 employees - or circa five per cent of the workforce - will leave the brand this year. The departures will be throughout the business, and are expected to save Aston Martin around £25m as it aims to forge a path towards consistent, sustainable profitability. 

The announcement came in an earnings call, where Aston’s end-of-year results starkly demonstrated the challenge ahead. For 2024 the pre-tax loss was £289m, or almost £50m more than 2023’s £240m figure. Aston Martin’s net debt now stands at more than a billion (£1,162,700,000) whereas last year’s figure was £814,300,000. That was said to be attributable to ‘the higher gross debt [£1,522,000,000] and a marginal decrease in the cash balance and the translation impact related to year-on-year movements in exchange rates.’ So clearly something has to change pretty drastically, and job cuts will be the first step. 

Despite what might seem like a gloomy picture overall - wholesale volumes were down almost ten per cent in 2024, to 6,030 units - there are some encouraging signs as well. A dip was to be expected as the range was being overhauled, with models going out of production and then replacements scaling up. Encouraging evidence of an uptick, with Vantage, DB12, DBX and Vanquish all on stream, comes from the Q4 2024 wholesale results, which showed an increase of eight per cent compared to the same period in ‘23, at 2,391 units. Let’s hope that continues into 2025. The average sale price of an Aston Martin in 2024 was £245,000, aided by a ‘significant contribution’ from the Valkyrie, Valour and Valiant specials. 

Speaking of specials, the upcoming Valhalla is expected to help the bottom line as well, with the first year of the 999-unit V8 PHEV already spoken for. (Must be the inclusion of a five-year warranty and servicing as standard that swung it.) As Aston Martin’s first plug-in hybrid, it represents quite a big step into the future for Gaydon - as well as a proper mid-engined rival for the supercar elite. 

As alluded to in our recent interview, the same timescale applies for Aston’s proposed transition to more electric power. For now, the focus is on PHEV, first with Valhalla and then extended out into the core range, with a BEV coming later this decade. Hallmark suggested the ‘phased approach’ to electrification “reflects the Company's strategy to offer a diverse range of powertrain options, including electric vehicles that will leverage our strategic partnerships and cutting-edge high-performance technologies, ensuring an unparalleled driving experience for customers.”

So just after one period of extensive renewal for Aston Martin, another one looms on the horizon; first Valhalla deliveries are due in the second half of 2025, continuing for a little more than two years. By which time we’ll probably know more about the hybridised future of Aston Martin, and whether the cutbacks enforced have had the desired effect. 

Echoing previous comments, Hallmark added in his CEO review: “Volumes alone though will not define Aston Martin, with a ruthless focus on our demand-led approach, ensuring we offer customers the ultimate in luxury retail experience with enhanced personalisation opportunities that allows us to maximise the value in every vehicle. Our goal to create a sustainably profitable business model, will be further supported through our renewed drive for operational excellence and efficiencies across the business. This approach will underpin progress towards our 2027/28 mid-term financial targets, delivering sustainable positive adjusted EBIT and Free Cash Flow generation.”

Nothing is standing still for long, then, so expect more changes sooner rather than later at Gaydon. And even more extras on the configurator for you to waste a lunch hour on… 


Author
Discussion

dukebox9reg

Original Poster:

1,720 posts

177 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....

kambites

71,459 posts

250 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
Apparently we (IBM) generally reckon on the total cost of employing someone being roughly four times their gross salary. If AM work on the same basis, that's only an average salary of £36k.

jenkosrugby

256 posts

249 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
Salary is typically the biggest overhead. For any one person you also have to consider floor space, pension contributions, basic salary, other benefits, these are then always used in P&L projections for future accounting, so alas, cutting jobs does make a considerable difference......It sucks though, and I wish any of those affected all the very best of luck...


V8 FOU

3,023 posts

176 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
" We are doing really well. Lots of new models. Lots of bespoke sales...... So we are kicking out 170 people"

DonkeyApple

69,712 posts

198 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
The cost saving isn't just the employee's salary. It cost just a little bit more than that to employ someone. wink

At least AM have a good line up finally and cars worthy of their price tags. But they remain a huge victim of the gutting of the business by the previous owners as they loaded it with debt and sucked all the money out the other side. frown

Muzzer79

13,057 posts

216 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
The cost saving isn't just the employee's salary. It cost just a little bit more than that to employ someone. wink
It's still pretty heavy

£25m divided into 170 is an average of £147k per person

Direct on-cost is around 20% (at least it is in my business)

So this averages at a base salary of c.£120k? If we're generous and take it down to £100k, that's still a lot of well paid people....

Tablelamp

2 posts

19 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
How does a company that has over a billion debt keep trading?

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,739 posts

127 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Sad to hear about the staff leaving. Saving £25m on a £289m loss though is only going to make a small dent.

And this was in a year I think when they would have had a full years sales of the DBX 707, which was meant to be the "saviour" car. Certainly the SUVs drive the big numbers at Porsche and Lamborghini.

Hard to see them pulling it round especially in a softer market for supercars at the moment. Ferrari aside, no other company works successfully in this area as an independent. Given the levels of debt, they are either going to need a massive equity injection, a take over by someone else, or go bust. Most of the main car manufacturers have more than enough problems on their plate at the moment so hard to see much interest in someone taking them over other than maybe a Chinese firm but, let's face it, Geely have hardly made a success of Lotus...

AndrewNR

398 posts

151 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Tablelamp said:
How does a company that has over a billion debt keep trading?
Hopium

The Pistonsdead

6,987 posts

236 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
" We are doing really well. Lots of new models. Lots of bespoke sales...... So we are kicking out 170 people"
Fair play

DonkeyApple

69,712 posts

198 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Tablelamp said:
How does a company that has over a billion debt keep trading?
By paying the coupons on time.

el romeral

2,152 posts

166 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
If Stroll was a half decent driver, their losses would be a lot less! I always found their product range to be a rather confusing mix of very similar models, all with different namesgetmecoat

ds666

3,157 posts

208 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
DonkeyApple said:
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
The cost saving isn't just the employee's salary. It cost just a little bit more than that to employ someone. wink
It's still pretty heavy

£25m divided into 170 is an average of £147k per person

Direct on-cost is around 20% (at least it is in my business)

So this averages at a base salary of c.£120k? If we're generous and take it down to £100k, that's still a lot of well paid people....
Some one needs to show me the maths pls

Wardy78

3,106 posts

87 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
DonkeyApple said:
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
The cost saving isn't just the employee's salary. It cost just a little bit more than that to employ someone. wink
It's still pretty heavy

£25m divided into 170 is an average of £147k per person

Direct on-cost is around 20% (at least it is in my business)

So this averages at a base salary of c.£120k? If we're generous and take it down to £100k, that's still a lot of well paid people....
On-costs of only 20% is very low. My business we factor in 3x salary. Granted, that includes recruitment, but once you've got NIC, benefits, bonuses (if paid) plus variable costs & allocated overheads.

Wills2

29,572 posts

204 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Wardy78 said:
Muzzer79 said:
DonkeyApple said:
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
The cost saving isn't just the employee's salary. It cost just a little bit more than that to employ someone. wink
It's still pretty heavy

£25m divided into 170 is an average of £147k per person

Direct on-cost is around 20% (at least it is in my business)

So this averages at a base salary of c.£120k? If we're generous and take it down to £100k, that's still a lot of well paid people....
On-costs of only 20% is very low. My business we factor in 3x salary. Granted, that includes recruitment, but once you've got NIC, benefits, bonuses (if paid) plus variable costs & allocated overheads.
If you want to divide the total overheads by the number of employees then yes you'll get an x multiple, but unless the overheads are also walking out of the door as well as the job you're not going to see the calculated savings.


ds666

3,157 posts

208 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Wardy78 said:
Muzzer79 said:
DonkeyApple said:
dukebox9reg said:
wow if letting go of 170 employees saves 25m, you pay your staff for too much.....
The cost saving isn't just the employee's salary. It cost just a little bit more than that to employ someone. wink
It's still pretty heavy

£25m divided into 170 is an average of £147k per person

Direct on-cost is around 20% (at least it is in my business)

So this averages at a base salary of c.£120k? If we're generous and take it down to £100k, that's still a lot of well paid people....
On-costs of only 20% is very low. My business we factor in 3x salary. Granted, that includes recruitment, but once you've got NIC, benefits, bonuses (if paid) plus variable costs & allocated overheads.
How do you save recruitment , allocated overheads and variable costs via redundancy ?
Surely you just save the total salary cost gross pay plus employers ni plus employers pension contributions ( plus maybe benefits such as company cars ) ?

Edited by ds666 on Wednesday 26th February 18:57

sherman

15,222 posts

244 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Tablelamp said:
How does a company that has over a billion debt keep trading?
By having way more than a billion in assests to leverage the debt against.

MDMA .

10,682 posts

130 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Tablelamp said:
How does a company that has over a billion debt keep trading?
Ask Thames Water for advice.

GreatScott2016

2,504 posts

117 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
sherman said:
Tablelamp said:
How does a company that has over a billion debt keep trading?
By having way more than a billion in assests to leverage the debt against.
Umm, that’s pawn broking and not a long term solution and I bet a big chunk of the assets are intangible. Profitability and moreover, cash generation are key. I’d hate to think what that debt profile is like for these chaps. Anyway, very sad for those impacted frown

redroadster

1,886 posts

261 months

Wednesday 26th February 2025
quotequote all
Spending huge sums on formula one to then to gey rid of cleaner to save a few quid.