RE: £15k Jaguar F-Type for sale: why wouldn't you
RE: £15k Jaguar F-Type for sale: why wouldn't you
Thursday 27th February 2025

£15k Jaguar F-Type for sale: why wouldn't you

Another depreciation milestone reached by Jag's hot rod


Perhaps like us, you didn’t have the Jaguar F-Type down as a £15k sports car option just yet. While there were some steep depreciation drops on the more expensive V8s, especially in recent years, F-Types also seemed to be holding strong (as so much has) in a post-Covid world. In the new Jaguar world, too. 

On the other hand, these cars are now anything up to 12 years old, and they weren’t huge money new: the Roadster range launched at less than £60k for the 3.0-litre non-S V6, rising to £80,000 for the V8 S. F-Types were popular, plenty sold, and the attrition rate hasn’t been bad. By now, it makes sense for an early, lower-powered F-Type to be around a quarter of its new price. 

This is currently what £15k of Jag sports car looks like, a 2013 3.0-litre with 340hp and 92,000 miles. At the time of writing, the most affordable 380hp S on PH is £17k, and the V8s kick off at £25,000. The 300hp 2.0-litre, introduced a few years later, is from £22k. We all know why an F-Type might appeal, of course: it’s a great piece of design that sounds brilliant in all its guises and drives really smartly as well. Perhaps it was heavier than ideal, and the manual when it came wasn’t much kop, but there was no denying the F-Type nailed the brief of being a charismatic, capable, desirable Jaguar sports car. 

In 2025, a 12-year-old F-Type still looks great, with its traditional roadster proportions and pretty details. The rear was always its best angle, and time has done nothing to diminish that appeal. Inevitably the inside dates the F-Type a little bit, the screens fuzzy by modern resolution standards and the menus clunky, but of course also it’s great to see functions controlled by proper, chunky buttons. This particular car is showing some signs of wear, most notably around the sill and the gearlever, though some TLC could hopefully bring those back to life. They needn’t be deal-breakers. 

Similarly, while there are some whoopsies in the MOT history - some rust, of course, like all the best classic British sports cars - the most recent ticket is advisory-free and runs until next Feb. While the dealer hasn’t mentioned any, there must be some service history somewhere. And your local Jaguar specialist will only be too happy to keep it in fine fettle. Plenty is familiar, after all. 

So while you’d still want to spend a little more for the very best early F-Types, there’s no escaping the fact that £15k buys what looks like a more than good enough one. The 981 Boxster isn’t yet down to this money (at least on PH) and the most affordable versions of those are 265hp 2.7s - the S 3.4s start at £25k. You’ll do well to find an SLK55 at less than £20,000. And how much more money is an F-Type likely to lose? Even the earliest, highest mileage XK8s from the '90s are for sale at £5k. For a car that still looks and sounds as good as the F-Type V6 does, £14,950 seems pretty compelling. Hopefully it won’t be long before the V8s are here, too...


SPECIFICATION | 2013 JAGUAR F-TYPE V6

Engine: 2,995cc, V6, supercharged
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 340@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332@3,500rpm
MPG: 31.4 (claimed)
CO2: 209g/km
Year registered: 2013
Recorded mileage: 92,000
Price new: £58,500 (before options)
Yours for: £14,990

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Justin-ow582

Original Poster:

605 posts

134 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
That's a very nice colour and wheel combination.

The F-Type was in my top 3 list when car shopping in 2013 but I couldn't stretch to the £29k asking price for the only MY2019 manual on the market at the time (apparently the earlier manuals had issues with the assisted hill-start).

If they were at this price back then I may well have turned a blind eye to it being an auto (and to the potential maintenance costs) and gone for a high-miler, especially in this colour, if there was one available at the time.

dukebox9reg

1,720 posts

177 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Obvious they are getting cheap, getting picked up by the barry boy parade and getting driven round by bell ends.

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
I love the fact that the V6 is actually a V8 block with two of the cylinders just blanked off. Tells me all I need to know about Jaguar.




bigyoungdave

328 posts

56 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
Obvious they are getting cheap, getting picked up by the barry boy parade and getting driven round by bell ends.
In my experience (and at least where I live) the F types haven't fallen into that category (even the old ones), unlike old BMW M cars, Audi RS models and range rovers which I regularly see being driven horrendously

Robertb

3,830 posts

267 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Tempting at this price.

Interiors on early ones I’ve looked at have been a bit ropey. Sticky buttons etc.

Subframe corrosion seems to be an issue too so inspect carefully

Same money bags a 5.0 XK.

Hoofy

80,015 posts

311 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Is the front bumper put on incorrectly? I checked the ad pics and it's misaligned on both sides.

GreatScott2016

2,503 posts

117 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
I do like the design and colour of the wheels, non standard?

Portofino

5,343 posts

220 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Love pre facelift F Types. This is remarkably cheap & looks in good condition.

Not sure F Types are on the Barrie’s radar. They are more interested in German whips rather than an English sword.

Alex_225

7,756 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
That is a lovely car for the money! I mean a V8 would be my preference but still, great looking car.

dukebox9reg said:
Obvious they are getting cheap, getting picked up by the barry boy parade and getting driven round by bell ends.
I'd imagine the typical rude boys who love unnecessary exhaust popping and driving like morons are still vying towards the Golf-R/RS3 and sadly a few AMG/M cars too. I don't see so many two seater convertibles falling into those hands, although I'm sure it does happen from time to time.

WPA

14,649 posts

143 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
I know these are not without faults but that does look a nice car for £15k

Ikobo

549 posts

178 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Lovely looking cars, and seems a bargain in todays ridiculous prices even with the high miles. I've always kind of wanted one but was put off by stories of major quality issues and high running costs, which to be fair may be nonsense as only going on internet ranting, but it still sticks in the mind.

Dr G

15,956 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
I think the reason no mention is made of service history, is that there's (almost) no service history to mention:



I think I'd choose to swim a little further upstream than this one. It's the cheapest for a reason.

jameswsb

28 posts

149 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Absolutely adore my V8. Took it on a two week trip around the Alps a few weeks after buying it and that trip will stay in my mind for the rest of my life. The car made it. Supremely comfy at smashing through the miles in northern France and epic fun on the Alpine passes. Even returned decent mpg. Had mine 2 years now and the only issue was a weeping diff which was sorted cheaply. Fantastic performance, amazing noise and just utterly beautiful. Folk may say a Porsche is more dynamic but, quite frankly, who cares on the road when the Jag just makes you smile at both 20mph and much higher speed. It also seems to get a positive comments unlike many BMW's I've owned over the years. Highly recommended

sideways man

1,668 posts

166 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
I’ll be looking to get a v8 convertible in a year or two , but I’m thinking slk 55 as they seem better value and more reliable than the jag. Am I wrong?

pb8g09

3,218 posts

98 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Always tempted but put off my the boot size as would be my only car.

ArmaghMan

2,791 posts

209 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all


Why wouldn't you?

Because this is the same money.

Portofino

5,343 posts

220 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
sideways man said:
I’ll be looking to get a v8 convertible in a year or two , but I’m thinking slk 55 as they seem better value and more reliable than the jag. Am I wrong?
Not sure why people think these are unreliable, IME they aren’t. Engines are a well known quantity & people bash on about the rear beam corrosion which is just surface corrosion. You get some aluminium corrosion usually where the clamshell joins the door (Think this has some) otherwise standard stuff.

My F Type cost less to look after than my E class coupe.


ThomW

1,943 posts

57 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
Someone at PH has been listening to the latest Smith & Sniff podcast rofl

je777

1,006 posts

133 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
bigyoungdave said:
In my experience (and at least where I live) the F types haven't fallen into that category (even the old ones), unlike old BMW M cars, Audi RS models and range rovers which I regularly see being driven horrendously
Wait, do you see any Range Rovers not being driven horrendously?

zorba_the_greek

1,136 posts

251 months

Thursday 27th February 2025
quotequote all
ThingsBehindTheSun said:
I love the fact that the V6 is actually a V8 block with two of the cylinders just blanked off. Tells me all I need to know about Jaguar.



Goodness. You got to give it to them genius...