RE: Peugeot RCZ GT | Shed of the Week
RE: Peugeot RCZ GT | Shed of the Week
Friday 25th April 2025

Peugeot RCZ GT | Shed of the Week

The RCZ marked the return of desirable Peugeots in 2009; is it a desirable Shed in 2025? 


There’ll probably be some mooing in the back rows this week as the ‘no comeback’ disclaimers for this week’s Shed get promoted from their usual quick mention at the end of the ad to headline status. We’ll get onto why this car is being disowned in a minute, but first let’s celebrate the SOTW debut of something that few expected to see in Peugeot showrooms, let alone Shed of the Week. 

When the RCZ wowed the crowds as a concept at the 2007 Frankfurt show few believed it would be turned into a real car. But, two years later, there it was again at Frankfurt, this time as a production vehicle that had hardly changed from the concept. 

At that time Peugeot was smarting from justifiable criticism of its products by folks who remembered how good Peugeots used to be on chassis dynamics. The RCZ was intended to help bring back some credibility in that department. If you could get past the sight of its voluminous back end, something Shed is obliged to do at home on a daily basis, it had a ‘special’, almost coachbuilt, look to it that took its cues from both Karmann Ghia and Zagato. It was actually built on the 308 platform but the ride height was 20mm lower than the 308’s, the tracks at both ends were wider, and the centre of gravity was 40mm lower. You could drop that last figure even further by having the double-bubble roof made out of carbon fibre. Pretty bespoke stuff for a car whose prices started at £21k for the 156hp version of the 1.6 THP turbo petrol – the same engine as the Mini Cooper S. 

Despite its humble underpinnings, the first road tests of the RCZ were heartening for Peugeot fans. The ride was firmish but nicely controlled even on the optional 19-inch wheels. The flagship spec, as per our Shed, was the 1.6 THP GT. That had 200hp, 188lb ft at 1,700rpm with up to 203lb ft on overboost, and despite its hefty-for-the-time weight of 1,372kg (64 per cent of which was at the front), a reasonable 0-62mph time of 7.6 seconds. Allied to long gearing (100mph in third) the THP motor was pleasingly fuel-efficient, its CO2 figure of 163g/km putting it in Band G which in money terms is £255 pa. 

The cabin told you how they got the prices low, being clearly 308-related, but it was quite well put together and the leather that was standard in the GT did lift the ambience. The driving position was all right too with no back-ruining pedal offsettery, though the steering wheel was more taxi than sporti. The back seats were largely decorative. The positive side of that was that you could double the luggage capacity to 760 litres just by folding them down, but the downside was that you had to shove your gear in via the main door as there was no rear entry, another scenario all too familiar to Shed. Still, you did get a switchable two-position rear spoiler, which was always good for impressing the lassies. You could almost say that sort of thing in 2009. Not now of course.

RCZs have become a bit less special these days. They made well over 50,000 of them, that milestone being passed in February 2013, two and a half years before the last one rolled off the Magna Steyr Graz line in Austria. At the time of going to press, there were around 160 RCZs on sale in the UK, and the entry price is low. Our 93,000-miler from 2012 in flagship 1.6 turbo petrol spec wasn’t even the cheapest one at £2,000. A similar looking, privately-owned 2011 1.6 diesel example with nearly 131,000 miles on the clock, worn suspension and a rusty rear spring was going for under £1,700 elsewhere. The only petrol RCZ that undercut our Shed was another 2011 car, this time with 125,000 miles on the clock and a slightly forlorn MOT-expired demeanour about it, at £1,790.

As per the rules of SOTW our Shed of course is correctly ticketed-up, and until next February too, the last test showing nothing more than worrying than slightly defective headlamp lenses. Shed’s eyesight isn’t able to discern what those slight defects might be. He thinks it might have been a slow day at the testing station. 

The catch with this car is the illuminated engine management light. It’s a known thing on these. With classic French insouciance it comes on randomly and just as randomly goes off again. Sometimes but not always it’s accompanied by limp mode. Sometimes you’ll waste a lot of money on useless or contradictory diagnoses. Sometimes it’s fixable by replacing the turbo. Fortunately you can douse the EML by turning the ignition on and off three times while looking at a mirror and shouting ‘good moaning!’. 

The vendor says this car drives OK, but they don’t add the phrase ‘all the time’ to that, so it’s a gambler’s choice. With luck you’ll cop onto a car that is both interesting to look at and interesting to drive. Shed won’t have it because it’s got ‘follow me home headlights’, and he really doesn’t want anyone, especially the po-po, following him home of an evening. 


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

yme402

Original Poster:

596 posts

124 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Foul looking Audi knock-off.

Sn1ckers

692 posts

80 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Hadn’t realised these were now in shed territory. Would be something a little different for a station car I guess. I quite like the looks, each to their own I suppose.

mooseracer

2,621 posts

192 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
yme402 said:
Foul looking Audi knock-off.
I'd rather "handsome TT alternative"
I'm not brave or mechanically minded enough for this one though.

Wren-went

1,035 posts

60 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Lot of car for the money but with the BMW PSA 1.6 Turbo in this Peugeot you really have to keep on top of them I know I had a 10 plate R56 Cooper S Mini which I didn't keep on top off

Been gutten for punishment I've got the same engine in a 14 Plate DS3 Dsprt Thp which is extremely mollycoddled with preventative maintenance & in over 3 years & about 27,000 miles the engine management light has never been on, this RCZ has got the engine management light on so it's probably the death rattle timing chain or needs a new turbo, they are a decent engine if you're willing to get things done before they typically go because they will.

Court_S

14,570 posts

199 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
I don’t mind the looks of these either.

They used to be pretty common but I can’t remember the last time I saw one on the roads. The engine is a bit of a turd though judging by friends who have had the Cooper S it shared it with.

HeMightBeBanned

626 posts

200 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Front end styling inspired by a Proboscis Monkey

daqinggregg

5,335 posts

151 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Doesn’t the bubble roof get in the way as you lean across for a quick snogg with the postmistress?

I have to ask “Why” just get an Audi TT instead, better car in every way.

Vsix and Vtec

1,287 posts

40 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Always felt a little sad for the RCZ, Peugeot got a lot of things right with it, but the engines I feel let it down. There was no genuine halo version either. A proper RCZ-Rallye with a stripped out/club sport style interior, suitable chassis fettling and a better engine would have done wonders for it (just look at the A110 for a desired lightweight coupe). I don't feel it deserves to be maligned with the Aldi TT moniker either, as in a lot of ways the RCZ was the better car. The bubble roof alone would, on any German car, be enough for people to laud it.

Repent

386 posts

195 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
I always respected Peugeot for having the balls to make this, growing up with 205, 106, and 306 GTi’s the intent to return to any sort of form after years of mass market dross as noted seemed a step in the right direction.

Ultimately these ended up being like the TT, ‘sports cars’ aimed at non-enthusiasts. People who want the look and don’t intend to have it anywhere near its limits. It ended up being more of the same in a sporty dress.

Edited by Repent on Friday 25th April 07:05

Maxym

2,748 posts

258 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
I’ve always been rather fond of these. Distinctive and elegant styling. Not this one though.

wistec1

728 posts

63 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Brimming with risk is this shed. Can the buyer fix the issues and keep the engine management lights out?

I'm getting a strong waft eau de turd.

Andy86GT

825 posts

87 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
"you had to shove your gear in via the main door as there was no rear entry, another scenario all too familiar to Shed"
roflroflrofl

fantheman80

2,373 posts

71 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
I think the shape and exterior style still looks good today, but was matched with an antiques roadshow interior which looked dated on release

FrankandLynn

55 posts

15 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Having once owned a French car from new, which during my ownership systematically and continuously spawned problems, I shall never have another. Luscious designs failed by awful execution. Plus de merde and bon chance to whoever takes this on.

username_checksout

391 posts

22 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Vsix and Vtec said:
I don't feel it deserves to be maligned with the Aldi TT moniker either, as in a lot of ways the RCZ was the better car.
What are the ways?

Front end suggests ‘blobfish’. Rest of the car isn’t much better.

Jazoli

9,478 posts

272 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
We had a 2.0 diesel one, it was great, and bulletproof, not a single issue in 60k miles.

The ride was a bit jiggly at sub 50mph but it handled really well, interior was nice also with the full leather dash, I’d say it was better than a TT in a lot of respects, and we’ve had a couple of them also.

trashbat

6,215 posts

175 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
"There’ll probably be some mooing in the back rows this week as the ‘no comeback’ disclaimers for this week’s Shed get promoted from their usual quick mention at the end of the ad to headline status"

I'll take it.

Isn't no-warranty, sold-as-seen a breach of consumer rights and thus an unworkable position for a retailer? Or is there some obscure legislative exemption for BREAKING THE LAW BUT IN ALL CAPS?

ThingsBehindTheSun

3,050 posts

53 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
As this is the 1.6 Prince engine I assume the EML being on means the engine is toast.

A lady I work with had one of these, the one with the Alcon brakes. I seem to recall the price for discs and pads was nearly £3k at a Peugeot dealer?

napoleondynamite

183 posts

152 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
Wasn’t there a more powerful one available with over 250bhp, or am I imagining that..

Snubs

1,372 posts

161 months

Friday 25th April 2025
quotequote all
I seem to remember when these were first revealed thinking it was going to be an exciting performance car. When it turned out to be little more then a base 308 with different bodywork interest rapidly dwindled.