Notice of intended prosecution

Notice of intended prosecution

Author
Discussion

TopPlonker

Original Poster:

48 posts

63 months

I've received a notice of prosecution for driving without reasonable consideration for others. The only thing I think it could be was a minor incident last week at a road works temporary light set up and I'd like your opinions on if I am guilty or not.

I believe I was caught on camera by the car at the red light at the other end of these road works, they beeped me and looked most upset. I assume they took great offense and took their dash cam footage to the police or something. I'm not entirely sure yet as I've only just got the letter and I'm yet to work out why they were even mad.

It was a straight road and the road works was a new bus stop being built, as I joined that road off a round about it was green to drive through and there was a taxi in front of me. I am the red square.



As I drive through the green light the taxi stops for whatever reason and just basically parks in the road, I assumed he was letting someone out.



At this point I am past the green light and cannot see it any more, so assuming the oncoming traffic was on a red light I drove around the taxi. I did this pretty much straight away.



This is when the karens in the black car (for the colour of their soul) beeped me and freaked out. I looked over as I past them to see they were on a green light. I assume this is why they were vexed.

Now I went through on a green light, 100%.

The taxi in front of me in my opinion is the retard here. Why did he have to stop there in the middle of temporary road works...

I personally think I've done nothing wrong.

am I the retard?

Lo-Fi

936 posts

83 months

TopPlonker said:
I've received a notice of prosecution for driving without reasonable consideration for others. The only thing I think it could be was a minor incident last week at a road works temporary light set up and I'd like your opinions on if I am guilty or not.

I believe I was caught on camera by the car at the red light at the other end of these road works, they beeped me and looked most upset. I assume they took great offense and took their dash cam footage to the police or something. I'm not entirely sure yet as I've only just got the letter and I'm yet to work out why they were even mad.

It was a straight road and the road works was a new bus stop being built, as I joined that road off a round about it was green to drive through and there was a taxi in front of me. I am the red square.



As I drive through the green light the taxi stops for whatever reason and just basically parks in the road, I assumed he was letting someone out.



At this point I am past the green light and cannot see it any more, so assuming the oncoming traffic was on a red light I drove around the taxi. I did this pretty much straight away.



This is when the karens in the black car (for the colour of their soul) beeped me and freaked out. I looked over as I past them to see they were on a green light. I assume this is why they were vexed.

Now I went through on a green light, 100%.

The taxi in front of me in my opinion is the retard here. Why did he have to stop there in the middle of temporary road works...

I personally think I've done nothing wrong.

am I the retard?
Did the taxi follow you out? Or stayed put and blocked the road for the Karens?

Robertb

2,550 posts

251 months

I don’t think you did anything worthy of a careless driving NIP on the basis of what you’ve said.

Presumably the police need to provide evidence?

Time4another

368 posts

16 months

Assuming they have dash cam footage. Ask for the footage to see if the taxi appears after you.

Yellow Lizud

2,604 posts

177 months

Lo-Fi said:
Did the taxi follow you out? Or stayed put and blocked the road for the Karens?
The taxi wasn't blocking the road, the OP managed to pass it.

The taxi just delayed the OP enough that the lights had changed by the time he got to the other end..


TopPlonker

Original Poster:

48 posts

63 months

I have no idea if the taxi followed me out, I didn't think to take notice at the time.

Robertb said:
I don’t think you did anything worthy of a careless driving NIP on the basis of what you’ve said.

Presumably the police need to provide evidence?
I assume they need to do that, I've no idea to be honest as I've not been in trouble with the plod before.

I'm hoping the footage shows the position of the light on my side of the road, if I enter a temp light on green surely there's no expectation for me to wait in that zone.

The taxi could only have stopped in front of me for 5-10 seconds maybe before I went around him.

Countdown

43,765 posts

209 months

I'm guessing the Karen assumes you did what so many people do at these types of roadworks and keep going through well after the lights have changed

I'm not sure what you'll be able to do to challenge it though. I'm assuming she has a dashcam of you coming through when her light was green.

popeyewhite

22,752 posts

133 months

TopPlonker said:
I'm hoping the footage shows the position of the light on my side of the road,
If you went through on green and nothing else happened I'm sure you'll be OK.

ashenfie

1,118 posts

59 months

From what have have said and drawn you have passed the stop here sign and as per the highway code continued. I would keep your power dry and simply ask for the evidence to be supplied

Hugo Stiglitz

38,978 posts

224 months

I'm guessing the person who reported you had a dashcam and it's been fully reviewed before the careless driving submission.
I'm not sure why you think it makes them a Karen though.

thepritch

1,540 posts

178 months

From what you’ve stated, your actions seem fine I think. You went on a green, and performed a safe manoeuvre and progressed through the roadworks.

Green doesn’t mean go, as there might be an obstruction, so the Karen had no right to proceed with traffic still coming through. I can’t see how dashcam evidence from Karen can determine whether or not you went through a red or not.

The only aspect that doesn’t sound entirely positive, is you said firstly that you immediately went around the taxi. Then you said later it was no more than 10 seconds. If the police believed you were stopping unduly (which would imo be unfair) then perhaps they are seeing that as an issue.

Failing that, either the police have seen something else that hasn’t been described above or it was a different incident.

Reply stating you were driving, but also ask to see the evidence.

InitialDave

12,961 posts

132 months

If the light was green when you passed it, and you had no way to know the lights had changed at the point the taxi stopped, I don't think you did anything wrong.

Normally you get these scenarios when it's a cyclist or tractor or other slow moving traffic that can't make it all the way through to the end of the section before the lights change and encounter someone too stupid to realise that their light being green does not mean the road is clear, and the instruction for a green light is "go if the way is clear" for a reason.


WrekinCrew

5,087 posts

163 months

I thought the Police are not obliged to provide any evidence until you plead not guilty (for speeding anyway, according to ftla.uk).

kiethton

14,183 posts

193 months

The NIP should have a location/road named and time/date - does this tally to the roadworks location/day of "incident"?

TopPlonker

Original Poster:

48 posts

63 months

Countdown said:
I'm guessing the Karen assumes you did what so many people do at these types of roadworks and keep going through well after the lights have changed

I'm not sure what you'll be able to do to challenge it though. I'm assuming she has a dashcam of you coming through when her light was green.
Her dashcam footage of me being being past the lights on my side will surely be enough here?


TopPlonker

Original Poster:

48 posts

63 months

kiethton said:
The NIP should have a location/road named and time/date - does this tally to the roadworks location/day of "incident"?
Yes, it's the only thing it could be.

I've got Google timeline on my phone. It puts me there at the time of this.

Mandat

4,167 posts

251 months

My assumption is that the cam car thought that the taxi had stopped at the red light, and that you had jumped the red light by overtaking the taxi, hence them submitting their footage.

If you get a chance to see the dash cam footage for yourself, make sure that you check what happens with the taxi. If the taxi is seen to follow you through the road works, or is seen still stopped after the lights, then that supports your version of events.

For the cam car's version to be true, the taxi would need to be seen on the footage as stopped before the red light, as the cam car comes through.

SmoothCriminal

5,374 posts

212 months

Wonder if the DCW has you on camera overtaking the taxi and plod think the taxi stopped for the red light and you darted around them.

Tbh temp lights are a cancer and the last few years are getting worse and worse no wonder so many people jump them.

Mandat

4,167 posts

251 months

Countdown said:
I'm not sure what you'll be able to do to challenge it though. I'm assuming she has a dashcam of you coming through when her light was green.
What does that actually prove?

Debaser

6,892 posts

274 months

I can't see what you've done wrong. I'll be interested to know the outcome.