RE: 2025 Mini JCW Electric | PH Review
RE: 2025 Mini JCW Electric | PH Review
Wednesday 28th May

2025 Mini JCW Electric | PH Review

The most powerful mini EV yet promises a lot - but struggles to deliver


On the face of it, there’s plenty to be encouraged by with the new Mini JCW Electric. The John Cooper Works badge has lent its name to some properly feisty hot hatches over the past 20 years or so, for starters - the current Cooper SE and petrol-powered JCW are decent enough, clearly with some potential left untapped. And the appetite for electric hot hatches (we assume) has never been greater, which is where Mini’s experience ought to pay dividends. Given its expertise in fast, fun and front-wheel drive, there should be no manufacturer better placed to make a 255hp battery-powered pocket rocket. 

Certainly, the JCW looks the part, which is to say that a slightly curious hatchback has been given an appropriately racy overhaul. The red accents are well-judged, the model-specific wheels look good, the aero kit lends some useful attitude, and the stance is… OK. It’s crying out for some track width and arch flares as a JCW, in truth, though perhaps that’ll come with a GPe. 

If you like the current J01 Mini, it will probably hit the mark, usefully more exciting to look at than a standard SE (if that buyer hasn’t plumped for a JCW aerokit). If the Alpine A290 looks like more your kind of hot hatch, this won’t change your mind on that. Inside, the JCW overhaul is reasonably modest - red bits and ambient lighting in the headliner are the main changes - but given how well the Mini interior blends a sense of occasion with ease of use, that’s no bad thing. 

You’re ready for maximum go-kart feel in a Mini JCW Electric, put it that way. Or whatever the strapline is this week. Unfortunately, some significant problems are evident from the off, which is disappointing for anyone with high hopes for this car based on fond memories of other JCWs. The ride is inexcusable, basically; which might sound like suggesting a dog isn’t for you because it barks - all modern Minis have been pretty firm and frenetic, after all - but with around 300kg of additional kerbweight to manage versus the conventional model, this really is to another level of unbearable. 

Even dawdling down a gravel track, the JCW is tense and unyielding, which doesn’t bode well. Sometimes a great car can be identified in the first 50 metres, just from the way it steers, rides, and feels at slow speed; the Mini, clearly, is not one of those. It feels like driving a dodgem that escaped from the fair, just you and a seat and whatever the surface throws up. 

Speed and tarmac don’t really improve the situation, every mile characterised by jostling and restlessness. Granted, the petrol-powered JCW was stiff-legged and somewhat lacking in suspension travel, but those traits are exacerbated here. It means the Electric is even more easily deflected by imperfections in the road, is keener to follow cambers, and creates a greater commotion when trying to cruise. Whatever the JCW suspension upgrades have done serves no benefit on a B road, the pitter-patter of every intrusion near constant. Ditto the new Hankook ion evoR tyres, because a stiffer, grippier electric Mini is a spikier one as it does move around. And that’s not very nice. 

Predictably enough, the JCW does feel better when a smoother bit of A road presents itself, though you'll be needing the deck of HMS Queen Elizabeth for it to genuinely settle down. And even then the Mini flounders a bit, its super sharp steering unable to mask the fact that this is a 1,725kg car, somehow. Which is 100kg more than even the Cooper SE. Lacking a proper limited-slip diff like the Alpine means there isn’t the front-end precision expected of a range-topping hot hatch. Usually the brake nibbling does a good job of keeping you on track, but not always. 

Because there’s the torque steer to think about, too. A bit of front axle fight is all part of the fun when it comes to a junior hot hatch, sure, and to Mini’s credit it never thumps or tramps - but the steering wheel is too easily agitated by 258lb ft. Which is entertaining the first time it happens, less so after a while. It feels unruly, truth be told. So you slow down, in a Mini JCW of all cars, concerned that either punishing suspension or an overexcited driven axle will fling you off the road. 

When there’s a chance to use the Boost paddle or Go Kart mode for the full power quota, the Mini definitely feels usefully brisk, a smidge faster than the 220hp Alpine despite its weight disadvantage. With an engaging soundtrack as well, one entirely in sync with throttle application and speed. And efficiency is always competitive, comfortably above three miles per kilowatt hour despite our best efforts. Mini’s regen mode for the transmission is so well-calibrated that it makes you wonder why others struggle so much. The powertrain, as expected given Mini’s experience, is a real highlight of the package. Just a shame about the rest of it. 

It’s doubly disappointing because the potential is there in a Mini Electric. The Cooper SE is firm and a bit frisky, but to an acceptable level, bringing some personality to a small electric car. The petrol JCW is similar, and bearable enough to do long distances when required. This one, however, is genuinely wearing in how abruptly it rides. An electric GP will need to significantly improve on this experience to justify its premium. 

All of which makes the JCW Electric very difficult to recommend, basically. A tough conclusion to reach, especially from someone who loved previous generations of the JCW and has enjoyed the current electric models. But if you want a speedy, battery-powered Mini, the Cooper SE with 40hp less is a better choice - especially as it can be made to look like a JCW. Alternatively, cars like the Alpine A290 and Cupra Born VZ are much better resolved electric hot hatches. Unless your commute is by go-kart track, Mini's performance flagship - which starts at around £5k more than the petrol JCW - is best avoided. 


SPECIFICATION | 2025 MINI JCW ELECTRIC

Engine: 54.2 kWh battery (gross figure; 49.2kWh net), single electric motor
Transmission: Single-speed automatic, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 255
Torque (lb ft): 258
0-62mph: 5.9 seconds
Top speed: 106mph
Weight: 1,725kg
MPG: 230 miles WLTP range, 95kW max charge rate
CO2: 0g/km (driving), 4.1mi/kWh claimed
Price: £38,420 (price as standard; price as tested £40,270 comprising Blazing Blue paint for £550 and Level 2 package (Comfort Access, Panoramic Glass Sunroof,  Sun Protection Glass,  Folding Wing Mirrors with Auto-dimming, Rear-view Mirror with Auto dimming,  Front Heated Seats, Adaptive LED Headlights, High-Beam Assistant,  MINI Head-up Display,  Storage for wireless charging) for £1,300)

Author
Discussion

wistec1

Original Poster:

637 posts

57 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Doesn't sound good does it? And with all due respect Matt if you as a humble automotive journalist can pick out the flaws by the seat of your arse on a test drive why with all the development technology available to them along with the road/track simulation (Millbrook or Mira) did they sign off on it?

It would appear a well informed appraisal and yet another EV to avoid which is easy for me because I'll never buy one.

blue al

1,187 posts

175 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
The blue is the best thing to say about this
I test drove an SE, but put my hard earned into a 22 plate Jcw F56 with a stick.
@ 40k it will only make sense as a factory backed cheap lease deal, not anti EV just anti 40k.

wistec1

Original Poster:

637 posts

57 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
And whilst I'm at it kicking my metaphoric can down the street. No EV Mini should be worthy of wearing the JCW badge same goes for any EV Porsche and the use of the word "turbo" when there isn't one anywhere in sight.

A "Fake taxi" badge is more appropriate designation.

Jamescrs

5,393 posts

81 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
It looks very bland to me for what is meant to be the top of the line hot hatch version, I do like Mini as a brand, my wife has had two and I have an R53 track car.

I recall going into the showroom and looking in passing at the previous gen JCW and thinking it looked great, this just doesn’t really stand out from a base model

howardhughes

1,249 posts

220 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
For 40k I'd expect at least 140 mph+ performance. Not 106!

Just NO.


highway

2,378 posts

276 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Can’t remember the last time I read a new car review from a mainstream brand where it wasn’t at least recipient of faint praise.
Will done for the honesty and calling out the mass and its subsequent effect on ride. This is too often glossed over with many EV’s.

Twinair

890 posts

158 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
1st review in a long time where ‘best avoided’ is written.

Shame indeed, had a full fat JCW IN 2011 - save for the engine which blew up, loved it.

This? EV? The weight? The ride? Yes - best avoided…

SpadeBrigade

770 posts

155 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Think I will keep my R53.

GreatScott2016

1,921 posts

104 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Not the best appraisal then. Above anything else, the alleged poor ride quality would deter me from the off. Sad really, as I have a soft spot for Mini having owned a R53 back in the day and really enjoyed it!

NDNDNDND

2,440 posts

199 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
This thing's heavier than my Camaro with its cast-iron V8...

FlukePlay

1,116 posts

161 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Twinair said:
1st review in a long time where ‘best avoided’ is written.

Shame indeed, had a full fat JCW IN 2011 - save for the engine which blew up, loved it.

This? EV? The weight? The ride? Yes - best avoided…
It's refreshing to read 'Best Avoided' especially for PistonHeads and what is a BMW product. PH usually gives a good appraisal on all BMW products and always glosses over any cracks...about time we heard something positively negative.

Black S2K

1,675 posts

265 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
FlukePlay said:
Twinair said:
1st review in a long time where ‘best avoided’ is written.

Shame indeed, had a full fat JCW IN 2011 - save for the engine which blew up, loved it.

This? EV? The weight? The ride? Yes - best avoided…
It's refreshing to read 'Best Avoided' especially for PistonHeads and what is a BMW product. PH usually gives a good appraisal on all BMW products and always glosses over any cracks...about time we heard something positively negative.
Agreed - makes such a change from praised with faint damnation.

Firebobby

842 posts

55 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Ah well, that's another £40k EV I won't be buying! Not that I had any intention of buying any £40k car, EV or otherwise. Sounds like they've got this one really wrong..

Zero Fuchs

2,618 posts

34 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
wistec1 said:
Doesn't sound good does it? And with all due respect Matt if you as a humble automotive journalist can pick out the flaws by the seat of your arse on a test drive why with all the development technology available to them along with the road/track simulation (Millbrook or Mira) did they sign off on it?

It would appear a well informed appraisal and yet another EV to avoid which is easy for me because I'll never buy one.
In fairness, even if Matt was blown away by it (in a good way), you'd still be slagging it off, because EV.

alock

4,401 posts

227 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Article said:
price as tested £40,270 comprising Blazing Blue paint for £550 and Level 2 package
Which idiot at Mini UK decided to price the car with what will be a very popular pack and upgraded paint, at £270 over the very silly tax threshold.

cerb4.5lee

37,886 posts

196 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
I can't believe that my old 2017 F56 Cooper S was under 1200kg, and this is over 1700kg! What is going on?! I must just be old really?

Even my lardy F82 M4 is lighter than this in comparison.

theicemario

1,244 posts

91 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
Pretty tragic that a Cooper E with the Sport kit looks exactly the same as this.

Fantastic looking car in that blue, mind.

TameRacingDriver

19,451 posts

288 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
I'll stick with my F56. Quarter of the price to buy, has a proper engine, a stick between the seats, makes a great noise (for a petrol turbo), half a ton lighter and with proper wheels and suspension can easily handle the worst a B road can throw at it.



However, it will be my last mini, they really are just the automotive equivalent of a posh handbag nowadays, they don't care at all about driving dynamics nowadays, just naff styling and infotainment.

cerb4.5lee

37,886 posts

196 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
For 40k I'd expect at least 140 mph+ performance. Not 106!

Just NO.
My old manual E92 M3 did 110mph in third for example...and it still had 3 more gears to go!

hammo19

6,521 posts

212 months

Wednesday 28th May
quotequote all
My friend has the new electric Countryman all tricked up and it looks fabulous. But he is returning the car as Mini Services keep switching off subscription services that he wasn’t made aware of when he bought the car. Things like Sat nav, heated seats, yes heated seats. When he asked Mini Services what he has on subscription they were unable to tell him and said go see the dealer which he did and they didn’t have a clue either. This is typical BMW. So he’s rejecting the car on the basis that he has no faith in the capability of the car as they could switch something safety related off whilst he’s driving. So beware……


Edited by hammo19 on Wednesday 28th May 09:19