RE: Volvo C30 SE Lux | Shed of the Week

RE: Volvo C30 SE Lux | Shed of the Week

Friday 20th June

Volvo C30 SE Lux | Shed of the Week

Remember when mainstream carmakers dropped weird and wonderful engines into otherwise humdrum hatchbacks?


Another Shed debutant today in the intriguing shape of this Volvo C30. Volvo called it a Sports Coupe, two words not normally associated with this outfit, but the spec of our shed hints that they might be justified on this occasion, so let’s give it a chance before we dismiss it. 

That isn’t exactly what happened when the C30 came out in 2006. The press quite liked the solidity of the three-door hatch, but they damned it with faint praise on the basis of it not handling as well as a Fiesta. In fairness, not many cars did, so maybe we can put that aspect to one side and consider this little Volvo on its own merits. 

What were they, then? Well, in the case of this particular example, it’s the gurt big petrol engine under the bonnet. Unlike many cars of the modern era, there was a boggling choice of motors available for the C30 at various points in its life: four turbodiesels from 1.6 to 2.4 litres and no fewer than seven petrols from a 1.6 to three 2.5 turbos via a couple of 2.0 bifuellers. The range was topped by a short-run 250hp Polestar Limited Edition near the end of the car’s run in 2013, at which point Volvo thought it might as well put out some 108hp electric C30s. 

The one we’ve got here is a 2008 SE Lux 2.4i with the hottest non-turbo straight-five in the range. This offered 168hp at a warblesome 6,000rpm, 170lb ft of torque at 4,400rpm, and that typical straight-five heavy flywheel feel to it which could take a bit of getting used to. Mated to the Aisin 5-speed Geartronic auto, as here, those stats gave Volvo’s 1,424kg coop a 0-60mph time in the mid-eights, a top speed of 134mph, and an average fuel consumption figure of 31mpg. 

Our car has 128,000 miles on the clock and a brand-new MOT certificate in the glovebox showing just one advisory for a deteriorated CV boot. By the looks of it, Volvo went for a ‘modular’ (i.e. cost-saving) approach on the C30’s seating, in SE Lux spec at least, by ramming in the perches from its much larger models. As such, we see that this C30 cabin is composed mainly of seats and not a lot else apart from the thin ‘floating’ centre stack for the HVAC and audio controls. That made it strictly a four-seater, although looking at the pics, even that might be pushing it. 

Shed and the postmistress reckon there’s more leg space in the back seat of his Reliant Robin than there is in this Volvo. On the plus side, the C30’s back seats could be folded down almost flat to create a surprisingly useful loading area, and the vehicle tax for the 218g/km auto is one band short of madness level at £415pa, so in the unlikely event of any active types below the age of 25 reading this, they might want to consider it as an alternative and luxurious sort of bike hauler. And despite what the pressers said about it in the period, the C30’s use of many gen-two Focus chassis components meant it really wasn’t that bad. 

The Volvo SCC concept on which the C30 was (actually quite closely) based was an interesting car. It made its first appearance at the Detroit show in 2001. Imaginatively, SCC stood for Safety Concept Car. That unassuming but accurate name encapsulated a raft of safety tech that was way ahead of its time. There were blind-spot monitoring sensors and cameras built into the door mirrors, adaptive headlights that turned with the steering (admittedly not new but still cool), active lane-keeping, fingerprint recognition, and something called an infrared light enhancer that extended night-time vision beyond the reach of the headlights, er, somehow. Best of all, it had see-through A-pillars made of plexiglass and trellised metal, a brilliant idea to help dozy drivers avoid those embarrassing over-the-shoulder sorry-I-didn’t-see-you-mate type situations that regularly resulted in bikers getting knocked off their steeds in mid-overtake. 

Sadly, that feature didn’t make it to production, even though Volvo claimed at the time that it could have made that happen, hmm. What did make it through to C30 production was the uniquely glassy rear-end style borrowed from the P1800 ES from the 1970s. Nice examples of that car are going for big dollars these days, by which we mean over £40k. Our 2.4 C30 is considerably cheaper at £1,995 and not that much more common than the oldster. A T5 turbo will be 50hp more powerful than the 2.4, but it will also be around three times the price. 

If you want additional, more contemporary cred, Shed thinks that the C30 had a starring role in a movie called Twilight, which Mrs. Shed says is now in the process of becoming an exciting Netflix TV series. Shed is happy to take her word on that. He certainly won’t be watching it. He’s very much hoping, however, that the serialisation will consist of many two-hour episodes because that will give him time for a round trip to the back of the next village’s cricket pavilion plus an hour of unsportsmanlike behaviour in between.


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

Martingt4

Original Poster:

11 posts

111 months

I think Mrs Shed's frying pan has hit Shed hard and he's started confusing Fiesta with Focus also mixing up a pillars and b pillars. An interesting shed but falls into that twilight zone of big engine with the accompanying thirst but not massive performance that makes you question if you might be better off with a diesel.

Gaumon

38 posts

10 months

The P1800ES-esque exterior is sadly let down by a very 'meh' interior.frown

theicemario

1,167 posts

89 months

Love the colour combo on this

el romeral

1,551 posts

151 months

What a curious looking thing with an equally curious engine. The rear legroom is atrocious. Was expecting the highest tax bracket, so at least that is something in its favour.

Turbobanana

7,165 posts

215 months

Timely, as my 17 year old has his test booked for November and has been eyeing these as a potential first car. Not the big engined one, mind, and not an auto as he's insisting on learning to drive a 'proper' car.

I won't discourage him...

turbomoggie

259 posts

118 months

A few years ago, I used to see C30s everywhere. Now they're almost a rarity. Great looking cars imo with interesting engine options.

Taz73

283 posts

26 months

Rear glass tailgate is more recently associated with the 480 which would be the C30's direct predecessor.

I like these though I'm sure the geartronic has it's reliability issues, but these are, in my opinion, very good looking cars that drive well if not quite as well as the focus they're based on. I personally couldn't state that, that's just going off reviews, I'm not skilled enough to notice the probably small differences, but I have driven a C30 and enjoyed it, it was only a 1.8 which they didn't seem to offer for long.

Great shed.

ChevronB19

7,685 posts

177 months

I always liked the look of these, quite classy and a nice hark back to the P1800ES

swanseaboydan

1,988 posts

177 months

Has exactly the same badly cracked cream leather seats that my old xc90 has - not sure how to smarten them up - any tips ?

Hub

6,759 posts

212 months

I've always had a thing for these since I saw a ln R-Design one at the motor show in about 2006. I didn't ever buy one though as they aren't practical enough. A rare case of form over function from a mainstream manufacturer, but that P1800es rear end means an absolutely useless boot! A decent shed though, just not one for tip runs!

Robertb

2,706 posts

252 months

swanseaboydan said:
Has exactly the same badly cracked cream leather seats that my old xc90 has - not sure how to smarten them up - any tips ?
Only re-finishing will fix it properly. You can have a go yourself or I know a brilliant bloke nr Oxford if you live in Oxon/bucks…. He’s a mobile trim restorer, does a great and inexpensive job. PM me if you want details.

Watcher of the skies

811 posts

51 months

I really like these. Classy and a bit different too. They drive well given the limitations of fwd. They have the usual attribute of Volvo durability and the engines are pretty punchy. Much more interesting than the usual white goods Golf fodder.

can't remember

1,099 posts

142 months

A nice quirky car but the MOT history suggests this one's been owned by someone who didn't care about the car. That driver's seat is shocking for a 17yo car with just 128k.

Sulphur Man

254 posts

147 months

V70/S60 engine, gearbox and even seats transferred into a 3-door hatch. This could go 200K miles no problem, although the seats suggest an unloved life.

cerb4.5lee

36,917 posts

194 months

The rear leg room does look tight in these for sure! I'm not fond of the tatty drivers seat either, but I guess beggars can't be chooses at this price point though. This is quite quirky, but I don't think it is me though.

dralig

17 posts

13 months

Always had a soft spot for these although I never understood why Volvo went to the trouble of creating a really attractive rear and then grafted the generic S/V40 nose onto the front. It’s as if they started at the back but lost interest half way through the front doors.

J4CKO

44,247 posts

214 months

Sort of interesting, engine is probably quite a nice unit and adequate with a nice noise I would expect. Not sure what the gearboxes were like.

Colour combo is a bit wishy washy and I would have to sort those seats out, the looks like a grey version of the superhero with the sort of cracked orange skin (Thing ?)

TheVole

548 posts

167 months

Good shed, although the 2.4i isn't the best motor. The later D3 and D4 lumps are the best compromise for a daily driver, or the T5 for performance. That said, I don't think you'll get any of those for shed money.

Rare colour, too, and one of the best although I may be biased. This is my T5:



I'll also take the opportunity to plug my Readers' Cars thread here.

smilo996

3,332 posts

184 months

It's a Lux, that lateral bonnet lip thing, low rear entry and Joey's recliners all round. As if the Dutch had taken a C30 and given it some love.
Very odd but somehow appealing, esp if the engine was the turbo spec and interfered with.

Crumpet

4,340 posts

194 months

Back when Volvo did interesting engines! Back when an interesting engine was enough to make you overlook how thoroughly dull, uninspiring and generally lacking the rest of the car was.

Good shed, though.