Legal aid query
Discussion
Ah, it was an email. I think that's the only way on contacting other people on here - if there is a message facility I've not come across it yet...
I've posted (with some amends) the message I sent below. I will delete once you've read it for obvious reasons.
A made false allegations of domestic abuse against B leading to B's arrest. B was able to prove (via video evidence) that he was in fact the victim of abuse and the police took no further action.
In the interim, A took out an NMO against B and was granted legal aid due to the domestic abuse allegations. The NMO is currently being contested.
A has been arrested by the police on a number of assault charges and controlling and coercive behaviour but no charges have yet been brought.
B has since submitted a C100 and C1A, with the FHDRA due in two weeks.
A is trying to adjourn as they are stating that, due to the legal aid cyber attack, they are unable to find representation via legal aid. It would appear that A's current legal aid funded solicitor will no longer represent them (no reason has been provided to B).
A earns approx. £45K pa so legal aid was originally granted on the basis of the false domestic abuse allegations.
My question is should A receive legal aid for the Child Arrangement Order given the facts above?
I really hope that makes sense.
Thanks
I've posted (with some amends) the message I sent below. I will delete once you've read it for obvious reasons.
A made false allegations of domestic abuse against B leading to B's arrest. B was able to prove (via video evidence) that he was in fact the victim of abuse and the police took no further action.
In the interim, A took out an NMO against B and was granted legal aid due to the domestic abuse allegations. The NMO is currently being contested.
A has been arrested by the police on a number of assault charges and controlling and coercive behaviour but no charges have yet been brought.
B has since submitted a C100 and C1A, with the FHDRA due in two weeks.
A is trying to adjourn as they are stating that, due to the legal aid cyber attack, they are unable to find representation via legal aid. It would appear that A's current legal aid funded solicitor will no longer represent them (no reason has been provided to B).
A earns approx. £45K pa so legal aid was originally granted on the basis of the false domestic abuse allegations.
My question is should A receive legal aid for the Child Arrangement Order given the facts above?
I really hope that makes sense.
Thanks
Odysseus01 said:
Ah, it was an email. I think that's the only way on contacting other people on here - if there is a message facility I've not come across it yet...
I've posted (with some amends) the message I sent below. I will delete once you've read it for obvious reasons.
A made false allegations of domestic abuse against B leading to B's arrest. B was able to prove (via video evidence) that he was in fact the victim of abuse and the police took no further action.
In the interim, A took out an NMO against B and was granted legal aid due to the domestic abuse allegations. The NMO is currently being contested.
A has been arrested by the police on a number of assault charges and controlling and coercive behaviour but no charges have yet been brought.
B has since submitted a C100 and C1A, with the FHDRA due in two weeks.
A is trying to adjourn as they are stating that, due to the legal aid cyber attack, they are unable to find representation via legal aid. It would appear that A's current legal aid funded solicitor will no longer represent them (no reason has been provided to B).
A earns approx. £45K pa so legal aid was originally granted on the basis of the false domestic abuse allegations.
My question is should A receive legal aid for the Child Arrangement Order given the facts above?
I really hope that makes sense.
Thanks
The rules say that if you (and your partner) earn more than £2657 a month then you only qualify for Legal Aid when the case relates to Domestic Abuse.I've posted (with some amends) the message I sent below. I will delete once you've read it for obvious reasons.
A made false allegations of domestic abuse against B leading to B's arrest. B was able to prove (via video evidence) that he was in fact the victim of abuse and the police took no further action.
In the interim, A took out an NMO against B and was granted legal aid due to the domestic abuse allegations. The NMO is currently being contested.
A has been arrested by the police on a number of assault charges and controlling and coercive behaviour but no charges have yet been brought.
B has since submitted a C100 and C1A, with the FHDRA due in two weeks.
A is trying to adjourn as they are stating that, due to the legal aid cyber attack, they are unable to find representation via legal aid. It would appear that A's current legal aid funded solicitor will no longer represent them (no reason has been provided to B).
A earns approx. £45K pa so legal aid was originally granted on the basis of the false domestic abuse allegations.
My question is should A receive legal aid for the Child Arrangement Order given the facts above?
I really hope that makes sense.
Thanks
> https://www.gov.uk/legal-aid/financial-eligibility
My assessment is that A should not receive Legal Aid for the Child Arrangement Order as a result.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff