2020 Model 3 Performance vs Long Range range difference
2020 Model 3 Performance vs Long Range range difference
Author
Discussion

Walter Sobchak

Original Poster:

5,732 posts

242 months

Monday 7th July
quotequote all
I’m currently looking to get a used Model 3 and weighing up which to get, it’s going to be doing a roughly 150 mile a day round trip and plan to charge at home at night to 80%.

What is the real life difference in range between the Performance and Long Range?, I’d love d of like the Performance for the nicer wheels and won’t lie the occasional putting my foot down but a few people I’ve asked say the Long Range is definitely the better choice for doing big mileage it uses less charge?.
This will be my first EV and being honest I’m not too clued up on them.
Looking to get a 5 ish year old one with 40-50k miles on and want to get one with the advanced autopilot.
Price wise on the used market there isn’t much between the 2 models so really think it’s a case of if the Performace is more than capable I’d go for one, if not then it will have to be the Long Range.
On paper it only looks like 20 miles between them on the figures but people have said this doesn’t translate in real world driving.

Hans_Gruber

300 posts

189 months

Tuesday 8th July
quotequote all
Both will do that range, both will mean you can charge from home. Both are fast, safe and comfortable for a regular 150 round trip.

However only one literally took my breath away when I floored it and made me re-think what fast was.

Other consideration is insurance but, be honest, you ve already stated which one you prefer wink

Gone fishing

7,854 posts

142 months

Tuesday 8th July
quotequote all
Theres a good chance the two cars will be very similar except for the wheels on that age. There are a few metal bits on pedals etc but typically the battery was the same, the rear motor and invertor was slightly higher rated on the performance but as the limiting factor was often the battery the differences were not great. A long range with the accleration boost was between the two but there wasn't a big spread in performance as countless head to head videos show.

The bigger wheels however do hurt range a little, and I suspect those buying the performance tend to enjoy the performance a little more so its hard to tell how much real world difference is wheels and how much is "fun". Either way, The performance wheels also seem to be a curb magnet for many users, and lack of top down cameras etc make it a guessing game, but the issue depends on how often you park next to a curb. Either way 150 miles is not hard in either model.

4-5 year old is on the cusp of the facelift - generally speaking if you can afford a facelift model, the easiest way to tell is the black window trim or the China "LRW" starting VIN, then its worth doing. There were quite a few updates such as heat pump, and the build quality back then was improving steadily but notably. I had a 2019 LR and it was pretty much the worst built car I have ever owned.

OIGMatt

38 posts

30 months

Thursday 10th July
quotequote all
Agree with Gone Fishing on the later models, my (limited) exposure to the earlier cars was also not favourable.

When I was in your shoes, I seriously considered all three options and ultimately went for a 2021 SR+ last year. Honestly? I still kick myself for not stretching to the Performance.

Why? It just ticks more boxes: it looks sharper, it's noticeably quicker, comes with better brakes, and you get Track Mode thrown in for a bit of extra fun when the mood strikes. The price difference isn't massive in the grand scheme, either.

I've usually gone for the top-spec version of whatever car I'm buying (not intended as a flex, trust me, some have been right old snotters), I can't think of any occasion where I've regretted purchasing the 'halo' model. The Tesla was already more of a head over heart purchase for me, so going conservative with the SR+ ended up being something I regret.

So, my two cents? Go for the Performance. I wish I had

Edited by OIGMatt on Thursday 10th July 14:09


Edited by OIGMatt on Thursday 10th July 14:09

ShortBeardy

396 posts

162 months

Tuesday 12th August
quotequote all
yup!

I have a long range Y, but have done miles in post 2021 update 3 (black trim, heat pump, heated wheel etc.), current 3 cooking model and current 3P. The last of which is better to drive and has better seats etc. It is eye opening and significant step up in dynamics, not just acceleration, from other variants. But most compelling argument comes from your own evaluation, so go drive one.

Bigger wheels are a curb magnet as noted above, but no worries about range as supercharger network cheap, fast and easy to use and the joy from a better car will far outweigh whatever rare instance you might require some additional charge.

ShortBeardy

396 posts

162 months

Wednesday 20th August
quotequote all
a very late follow up....

I think the heat pump and acoustic glass windows of the post mid 21 facelift are worthwhile updates.

I really liked the latest M3P, it was plenty rapid but also quiet and a general step up in terms of refinement. I think it has different uprights that result in a `faster rack' and allegedly different bushing in the suspension, so it is noticeably different than the other variants. However, IMO the biggest differences are the seats and suspension. So, if you got a post 21 facelift LR and fitted the current gen. suspension (which is just swapping struts and rear dampers and springs - they just bolt-in), you'd be a good way to a Highland without a lot of the cost. Not sure what you could do about seats - be worth doing some digging on forums