RE: 2025 BMW M3 CS Touring (G81) | PH Review

RE: 2025 BMW M3 CS Touring (G81) | PH Review

Today

2025 BMW M3 CS Touring (G81) | PH Review

The M3 CS was a knock-out. Can BMW do the same with the heavier wagon?


BMW never intended to make an M3 CS Touring. The fact it built an M3 wagon in the first place is something of a novelty, having famously revealed an achingly cool prototype based on the E46 and taking the best part of 20 years to follow up on it. And when it did arrive for the G81 generation in 2022, the plan was to cap performance at the Competition level and leave the faster variants to the M3 saloon and M4. But then came the glowing reviews of the most recent CS models - much as they were for the old M2 and M5 - which got BMW thinking: ‘It’d be a shame to not do the same for the Touring, wouldn’t it?’

Yes, it would, not least because the M3 Touring has proved immensely popular. Sales for the wagon were up 57 per cent following last year’s LCI updates, and it wasn’t that long ago when orders between the Touring and saloon were an even split. And while it may seem a bit out of character for BMW to make a more focused version of the biggest and heaviest model in the G8X range, today’s M cars are so naffing heavy that the estate’s additional 90kg over the saloon feels like a drop in the ocean. Providing it can successfully transplant all the goodness from the M3 CS saloon to the Touring, it’ll doubtless find enough people willing to spend at least £120,600 - or £30k more than the Comp - to get their hands on one.

To that end, BMW is following the saloon’s formula to a tee, right down to the M4 CSL-derived red highlights that draw attention to the M3’s gopping grille like a baboon to its backside. That being said, I’ve always thought the Touring wore the G8X snout better than the rest, and it does look extra mean with those carbon fibre flicks, diffuser and CSL-inspired bonnet, especially when paired with Individual British Racing Green like the test car BMW laid on for us. 

It’s not often you get a racetrack all to yourself, but that’s exactly what PH's first encounter with the CS Touring entailed. A full hour and a half of fun at Thruxton, the UK’s fastest circuit, with nobody else in sight. I could drive the thing backwards if I wanted to, says the man at the pit exit, and doing so at the request of BMW's snapper to get some action shots at the final chicane feels a bit like mooning the teacher. But this is a circuit made up of long, high-speed sweepers broken up by two heavy braking zones, the sort of layout that’s thrilling in a BTCC car and punishing to super estates with 50 per cent more weight. On paper, you might expect the near two-tonne M3 CS Touring to be overawed by the challenge. Well, BMW didn’t get the memo, because the CS Touring is nothing short of sensational.

Pretty much immediately, the CS Touring feels more agile and direct than the standard M3 Comp. The speed at which it will take Thruxton’s opening, right-hand sweeper would surely send most cars of its size and weight understeering off into the nearby tyre walls, yet the CS Touring dives eagerly towards the apex and claws its way out without so much as a chirp from the front axle. Like the saloon version, BMW has given the CS Touring new adaptive dampers and springs, fine-tuned the geometry, recalibrated the steering and adjusted the DSC, all of which have sharpened up some of the Comp’s softer edges.

Of course, it helps that this particular car is shod with the optional Michelin Cup 2Rs, and the CS sticks with xDrive, though you can still fire 100 per cent of the power to the rear wheels for a more traditional feel. But even with both axles in play, the Touring will oversteer long before it washes wide. Thruxton’s Goodwood corner is both blind and slightly off camber, and requires you to pin the throttle long before you see the exit. So confidence-inspiring is the CS that it's easy to get overly greedy with the throttle, but the rear end is always a model of predictability even when it does break loose - helped no end by an improvement in feedback from the steering. As ever, M Dynamic Mode’s more lenient DSC will step in if it thinks you’ve overcooked it, though in the CS this rarely seems to impede on all the fun you're having. 

There isn’t really a back straight at Thruxton, but there’s enough room towards the end of the lap to unlock the full 550hp from a 3.0-litre straight-six that now boasts the CSL's turbochargers. Goodness, it’s quick, as illustrated by the 3.5-second 0-62mph time and a claimed 11.7-second dash from 0-124. You'll be going a fair bit quicker than that in the run up to the final chicane, where you'll discover a lovely, progressive feel to the (again, optional) carbon ceramic brakes. They’re so powerful that it's easy to brake far too early, seemingly no matter the kerbweight (despite a 15kg weight saving through standard M Sport Carbon buckets and various other bits, the CS Touring still weighs 1,850kg). The CS disguises its weight so well, in fact, that after 90 minutes of near-continuous lapping, I’d completely forgotten I was driving the Touring version. 

What’s even more impressive is the way all those little upgrades and refinements translate to the road when you slap a set of Pilot Sport 4Ss on and head out into the real world. It’s noticeably firmer than the M3 Comp, but it’s neither uncomfortable nor hunting for cambers, even when you dial the dampers up to Sport Plus. The steering feels weightier around the centre, and it sounds good, too, thanks to a new titanium sports exhaust lifting the volume a fair bit - though admittedly not enough to turn the M3’s baritone bark into something a little more tuneful. Even when you dial everything back to its most comfort-oriented setting, the CS Touring still feels more eager and responsive than the Comp, yet the underlying setup leaves you in no doubt that the prospect of driving to and from the Nurburgring would be no more taxing than in the base car. And yet your lap time would acknowledge the difference. 

For anyone with their heart already set on the CS, that confirmation will very likely suffice. For everyone else, it's worth noting the incredibly high bar that the M3 Touring has previously set. The CS comfortably exceeds it, but the step change doesn’t feel quite as significant as, say, the monumental leap made between the old M5 Comp and its own CS alter ego. Objectively speaking, that does make the £30k premium a little trickier to justify, although, then again, it does improve on the Comp in all the key areas without demanding any irksome sacrifices. Moreover, of course, the CS Touring will only be built in double figures, which ought to virtually guarantee a sales home run (not to mention copper-bottomed residuals). Those lucky few will be getting arguably the most versatile M car to date. 


SPECIFICATION | BMW M3 CS TOURING (G81)

Engine: 2,993cc straight-six, twin-turbocharged
Transmission: eight-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,250rpm
Torque (lb ft): 479@2,750rpm-5,950rpm
0-62mph: 3.4 seconds
Top speed: 186mph
Weight: 1,850kg DIN, 1,925kg EU
MPG: 22.4
CO2: 238g/km
Price: £120,600

Author
Discussion

big_rob_sydney

Original Poster:

3,660 posts

209 months

120 grand for a 3 series wagon. Wow.

NGK210

3,950 posts

160 months

120 grand for a hideous 3-series wagon. Nucking futs.

Ian-g14dj

15 posts

114 months

Too in-your-face...

There was a time when unassuming performance cars used to attract the simile 'a brute in a suit', but now they're more 'a chav in cap'

Edited by Ian-g14dj on Tuesday 29th July 07:14


Edited by Ian-g14dj on Tuesday 29th July 07:14

Twinair

876 posts

157 months

I would. Infact - that might well be Mrs Twinair’s next daily.

GianiCakes

468 posts

88 months

Twinair said:
I would. Infact - that might well be Mrs Twinair s next daily.
I would too. Sadly I missed a trick there as, inevitably, Mrs GC prefers to sit high irked There’s some pretty good deals on the non CS models as well.

fantheman80

1,999 posts

64 months

Needs some spacers but all the car id ever need.

British Beef

2,524 posts

180 months


The Paradox for me, is that if you have £120k to spend on a nice car, you almost certainly have sufficient garage space to have say a range rover for comfort and luxury and a Mclaren for speed and fun.

IF you can only have 1 car that does practical and super fast this is great, but not super comfortable for long journeys (firm suspension and tyre noise mainly). Maybe Im getting old........

Abacus21

163 posts

50 months

£120k gets you a super fast RS6 2 years old and an Alpine A110

I know what I rather get.

flight147z

1,240 posts

144 months

Doesn't really come across as a £120k car

Vee12V

1,386 posts

175 months

What an utter chav mobile.

georgeyboy12345

3,937 posts

50 months

Too little too late for me. BMW should have been making M3 wagons ages ago, at least from E36 maybe even E30

CRA1G

7,034 posts

210 months

I'd have one but don't need one...wish BMW had done a E91 M3 Touring 16/17 years ago as it would have been my preferred choice over the E61 M5 Touring which i never really got on with, too big and that too unreliable to really enjoy that car. Don't need a wagon any more so my little M2 with a mere 480 horses does the job.....drivingthumbup

smilo996

3,398 posts

185 months

No one makes estates anymore, we wannabe makin Wagons y'all🙄

Never understood the detractors for the current BMW design language, that looks epic, from the wheels up. Under 2 tons as well, quite an achievement these days. Looks very doomsday in black.

fantheman80

1,999 posts

64 months

Abacus21 said:
£120k gets you a super fast RS6 2 years old and an Alpine A110

I know what I rather get.
True, if you've got £120K to spend in one go, but not many will pay £120k cash outright - its all about the monthlies

WPA

12,064 posts

129 months

£120k for an M3 is crazy, surely other and better options available SH

pSyCoSiS

3,908 posts

220 months

Looks good, but can't help thinking it look a bit under-wheeled at the front?

This or the M5 Touring?

Terryakki

5 posts

£120k!!! But guess it's all about the monthlies. As the World Economic Forum like to say, "you will own nothing and be happy".

But doing the maths, the cheapest M3 Touring on lease I can find, with the 12,000 miles a year I need is £1,440 per month, with £17.5k down upfront. Total cost over 3 years £68k.

Personally I've recently spent £25k on one of the lowest mileage, best maintained V10 RS6's in the country. I'm keeping an extra £10k in a slush fund incase something major needs doing. After 3 years the RS6 will probably be worth £20k, and assuming I use all of the slush fund, total cost for three years motoring will be roughly £15k.

£68k versus £15k.
Inline 6 v's Twin Turbo V10.
Car you see all the time v's car you don't see very often.
Shouty 'look at me' styling v's walk softly but carry a big stick.
Rental where after 3 years you have nothing to show for your outlay v's ownership where after 3 years I still have a car that's worth £20k.

I know which one to me makes more sense. And I'm happier to own outright to be honest, but also incredibly grateful to all those who feel that they must have the next latest thing on the monthlies, as it provides the rest of us with some lightly used bargains from time to time.

Edited by Terryakki on Tuesday 29th July 09:25

Andy83n

551 posts

77 months

I can't imagine doing any purposeful journey in one of those seats- which makes the touring part of the car utterly pointless.

Just get a saloon

ITP

2,226 posts

212 months

pSyCoSiS said:
Looks good, but can't help thinking it look a bit under-wheeled at the front?

This or the M5 Touring?
Neither! The M5 is even more ugly than the M3 to my eyes.

Both technically very clever for sure, but seems crazy to me the direction these M cars have gone. Too big, and also too fast for the road, but also too heavy for the track. And ugly. And expensive. Shame.

Slippydiff

15,594 posts

238 months



Grace, pace (massive) and space. And the small matter of £70k in the piggy bank ...

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202507234...