Paris Blue 720s
Discussion
Does anyone have any information/history of the below 720s currently for sale ?
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/2025060632...
Cheers
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/2025060632...
Cheers
There’s something not quite right about the carbon fiber. The armadillo cover doesn’t have the McLaren signature V pattern and the carbon weave on other panels looks to be larger than OEM. Check with the dealership if they will guarantee authenticity of all parts fitted since it left the factory in addition to the original build spec (they can get the build spec using the VIN). There’s a lot of non-McLaren parts (usually chinese) out there. I’d also check if the seats and harness bar are OEM.
Get the VIN and work out the build date versus registration date. There’s several cars that have sat on forecourts and at McLaren HQ which seem younger than they actually are. I’ve seen cars that have had their logos changed from red logo to silver logo to coincide with the registration date.
It is being sold as an approved McLaren vehicle. One would expect it to be all genuine OEM, and if not, it should be disclosed during the sale process.
Another thing to note is the software version. Earlier 2017 and some 2018 cars cannot be updated to the latest software version - not backwards compatible - latest software version = SBM14DCC5KW003344
Edit: looks like the advert has been pulled. Did you buy it?
Get the VIN and work out the build date versus registration date. There’s several cars that have sat on forecourts and at McLaren HQ which seem younger than they actually are. I’ve seen cars that have had their logos changed from red logo to silver logo to coincide with the registration date.
It is being sold as an approved McLaren vehicle. One would expect it to be all genuine OEM, and if not, it should be disclosed during the sale process.
Another thing to note is the software version. Earlier 2017 and some 2018 cars cannot be updated to the latest software version - not backwards compatible - latest software version = SBM14DCC5KW003344
Edit: looks like the advert has been pulled. Did you buy it?
Edited by Zorbathegreek on Friday 15th August 18:26
Zorbathegreek said:
There’s something not quite right about the carbon fiber. The armadillo cover doesn’t have the McLaren signature V pattern and the carbon weave on other panels looks to be larger than OEM. Check with the dealership if they will guarantee authenticity of all parts fitted since it left the factory in addition to the original build spec (they can get the build spec using the VIN). There’s a lot of non-McLaren parts (usually chinese) out there. I’d also check if the seats and harness bar are OEM.
Get the VIN and work out the build date versus registration date. There’s several cars that have sat on forecourts and at McLaren HQ which seem younger than they actually are. I’ve seen cars that have had their logos changed from red logo to silver logo to coincide with the registration date.
It is being sold as an approved McLaren vehicle. One would expect it to be all genuine OEM, and if not, it should be disclosed during the sale process.
Another thing to note is the software version. Earlier 2017 and some 2018 cars cannot be updated to the latest software version - not backwards compatible - latest software version = SBM14DCC5KW003344
Edit: looks like the advert has been pulled. Did you buy it?
There are no fake p1 seats or harness bars (720s) available, so must be genuine.Get the VIN and work out the build date versus registration date. There’s several cars that have sat on forecourts and at McLaren HQ which seem younger than they actually are. I’ve seen cars that have had their logos changed from red logo to silver logo to coincide with the registration date.
It is being sold as an approved McLaren vehicle. One would expect it to be all genuine OEM, and if not, it should be disclosed during the sale process.
Another thing to note is the software version. Earlier 2017 and some 2018 cars cannot be updated to the latest software version - not backwards compatible - latest software version = SBM14DCC5KW003344
Edit: looks like the advert has been pulled. Did you buy it?
Edited by Zorbathegreek on Friday 15th August 18:26
What difference would replica carbon parts make to a Mclaren warranty?
Streetbeat said:
There are no fake p1 seats or harness bars (720s) available, so must be genuine.
What difference would replica carbon parts make to a Mclaren warranty?
There are Chinese copy P1 seats (as well as Senna seats). There are harness bars made for the 720S by independent businesses based in UK. What difference would replica carbon parts make to a Mclaren warranty?
I doubt replica carbon parts would make any difference to warranty, but if the OP is buying under the impression that they are genuine McLaren parts fitted (as part of track pack), that does make a difference. The OP was asking for some help on a particular sales advert. Someone inferred that it had been upgraded to track pack.
It is pretty easy to spot non-McLaren carbon fiber parts because they tend not to have the signature ‘V’ pattern and lack the McLaren quality. It’s a shame the advert has been pulled. The Armadillo was definitely not OEM. The bat wing fluid top-up cover wasn’t carbon fiber, which is unusual for a track-pack spec car.
IIRC, wasn’t the track pack only available from 2019 onwards. The car in the advert was 2018.
Edited by Zorbathegreek on Saturday 16th August 20:39
Zorbathegreek said:
There are Chinese copy P1 seats (as well as Senna seats). There are harness bars made for the 720S by independent businesses based in UK.
I doubt replica carbon parts would make any difference to warranty, but if the OP is buying under the impression that they are genuine McLaren parts fitted (as part of track pack), that does make a difference. The OP was asking for some help on a particular sales advert. Someone inferred that it had been upgraded to track pack.
It is pretty easy to spot non-McLaren carbon fiber parts because they tend not to have the signature ‘V’ pattern and lack the McLaren quality. It’s a shame the advert has been pulled. The Armadillo was definitely not OEM. The bat wing fluid top-up cover wasn’t carbon fiber, which is unusual for a track-pack spec car.
IIRC, wasn’t the track pack only available from 2019 onwards. The car in the advert was 2018.
Plenty of semna copies, never seen p1 copies or 720s harness bars that mimic the mso ones, happy to be corrected if you can supply links.I doubt replica carbon parts would make any difference to warranty, but if the OP is buying under the impression that they are genuine McLaren parts fitted (as part of track pack), that does make a difference. The OP was asking for some help on a particular sales advert. Someone inferred that it had been upgraded to track pack.
It is pretty easy to spot non-McLaren carbon fiber parts because they tend not to have the signature ‘V’ pattern and lack the McLaren quality. It’s a shame the advert has been pulled. The Armadillo was definitely not OEM. The bat wing fluid top-up cover wasn’t carbon fiber, which is unusual for a track-pack spec car.
IIRC, wasn’t the track pack only available from 2019 onwards. The car in the advert was 2018.
Edited by Zorbathegreek on Saturday 16th August 20:39
Officially yes but they were supplying the track pack as a package beforehand. The advert never stated they were oem carbon fibre, so as you say up to the buyer to decide whether its an issue, but it wont affect warranty which you said would present an issue.
Look forward to the links.
Edited by Streetbeat on Sunday 17th August 09:29
Streetbeat said:
Plenty of semna copies, never seen p1 copies or 720s harness bars that mimic the mso ones, happy to be corrected if you can supply links.
Officially yes but they were supplying the track pack as a package beforehand. The advert never stated they were oem carbon fibre, so as you say up to the buyer to decide whether its an issue, but it wont affect warranty which you said would present an issue.
Look forward to the links.
Look pal, I’m simply responding to the OP who was asking for some advice on the advertised car. I’m not here to justify myself. Take it as you want. At no point had I mentioned anything to do with warranty.Officially yes but they were supplying the track pack as a package beforehand. The advert never stated they were oem carbon fibre, so as you say up to the buyer to decide whether its an issue, but it wont affect warranty which you said would present an issue.
Look forward to the links.
Edited by Streetbeat on Sunday 17th August 09:29
BTW, I’m a 720S owner. I’ve had two since 2018, one of which is track pack, including sports exhaust, super lightweight P1 wheels, P1 seats (touring size), MSO harness bar, track telemetry system with three cameras and loads of carbon fiber.
Zorbathegreek said:
Look pal, I’m simply responding to the OP who was asking for some advice on the advertised car. I’m not here to justify mysel.
You do have to justify yourself when your advise is wrong though "pal", no need to get bent of shape and defensive, if im wrong im happy to proved so and the OP receives the correct info.Zorbathegreek said:
Streetbeat said:
There are no fake p1 seats or harness bars (720s) available, so must be genuine.
What difference would replica carbon parts make to a Mclaren warranty?
There are Chinese copy P1 seats (as well as Senna seats). There are harness bars made for the 720S by independent businesses based in UK. What difference would replica carbon parts make to a Mclaren warranty?
I doubt replica carbon parts would make any difference to warranty, but if the OP is buying under the impression that they are genuine McLaren parts fitted (as part of track pack), that does make a difference. The OP was asking for some help on a particular sales advert. Someone inferred that it had been upgraded to track pack.
It is pretty easy to spot non-McLaren carbon fiber parts because they tend not to have the signature ‘V’ pattern and lack the McLaren quality. It’s a shame the advert has been pulled. The Armadillo was definitely not OEM. The bat wing fluid top-up cover wasn’t carbon fiber, which is unusual for a track-pack spec car.
IIRC, wasn’t the track pack only available from 2019 onwards. The car in the advert was 2018.
Edited by Zorbathegreek on Saturday 16th August 20:39
Streetbeat said:
Zorbathegreek said:
Look pal, I’m simply responding to the OP who was asking for some advice on the advertised car. I’m not here to justify mysel.
You do have to justify yourself when your advise is wrong though "pal", no need to get bent of shape and defensive, if im wrong im happy to proved so and the OP receives the correct info.Frankychops said:
Zorbathegreek said:
Streetbeat said:
There are no fake p1 seats or harness bars (720s) available, so must be genuine.
What difference would replica carbon parts make to a Mclaren warranty?
There are Chinese copy P1 seats (as well as Senna seats). There are harness bars made for the 720S by independent businesses based in UK. What difference would replica carbon parts make to a Mclaren warranty?
I doubt replica carbon parts would make any difference to warranty, but if the OP is buying under the impression that they are genuine McLaren parts fitted (as part of track pack), that does make a difference. The OP was asking for some help on a particular sales advert. Someone inferred that it had been upgraded to track pack.
It is pretty easy to spot non-McLaren carbon fiber parts because they tend not to have the signature ‘V’ pattern and lack the McLaren quality. It’s a shame the advert has been pulled. The Armadillo was definitely not OEM. The bat wing fluid top-up cover wasn’t carbon fiber, which is unusual for a track-pack spec car.
IIRC, wasn’t the track pack only available from 2019 onwards. The car in the advert was 2018.
Edited by Zorbathegreek on Saturday 16th August 20:39
Zorbathegreek said:
Streetbeat said:
Zorbathegreek said:
Look pal, I’m simply responding to the OP who was asking for some advice on the advertised car. I’m not here to justify mysel.
You do have to justify yourself when your advise is wrong though "pal", no need to get bent of shape and defensive, if im wrong im happy to proved so and the OP receives the correct info.Whenever I see someone being asked to provide evidence for something they said, if they choose not to simply provide said evidence, but instead get defensive and act like doing so is a waste of their time, I tend to take it as an admission that they don't have any evidence but don't want to admit it. Simply providing evidence when asked is usually easier than getting into an argument, and is a much better way of proving ones point
murphyaj said:
I don't have any idea if replica P1 seats are available, so I have no idea who is right here, but just a little FYI how this comes across to an external observer:-
Whenever I see someone being asked to provide evidence for something they said, if they choose not to simply provide said evidence, but instead get defensive and act like doing so is a waste of their time, I tend to take it as an admission that they don't have any evidence but don't want to admit it. Simply providing evidence when asked is usually easier than getting into an argument, and is a much better way of proving ones point
Have you got a link?Whenever I see someone being asked to provide evidence for something they said, if they choose not to simply provide said evidence, but instead get defensive and act like doing so is a waste of their time, I tend to take it as an admission that they don't have any evidence but don't want to admit it. Simply providing evidence when asked is usually easier than getting into an argument, and is a much better way of proving ones point
Oaky said:
Have you got a link?

Well, since you asked nicely
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitchens%27s_razor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(phi...
Gassing Station | McLaren | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff