RE: Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 | Spotted
RE: Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 | Spotted
Monday 1st September

Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 | Spotted

The 7.0-litre Camaro was always a very special car - and now they're Golf R money


It’s easy right now to be a little despondent as a UK-based car fan, given how little fun stuff seems to be available to us. Or if it is, how expensive it seems to be. But times could hardly be better in the US, with the wild Corvette ZR1 and ZR1X coming soon, the final Blackwing Cadillacs available, surely the bulk of Mustang GTD going there, Acura Integras, 86s and BRZs… you get the picture. Truth be told, the US has been cranking out some fantastic driver’s cars for bloomin ages now. Pretty much since the Big Three were bailed out, they've been on an amazing streak with the Hellcat Dodges, the Voodoo-engined Mustangs, the final generation of Viper ACR and so on. 

The return of the Camaro Z/28 was a perfect example of the breed. Not every Z/28 in history had been brilliant, but the fifth generation really was something special. Because it was so much more than a big engine, even if the dry-sumped 7.0-litre LS7 - paired with a six-speed manual - really was a huge part of the appeal. There was the torque from that gigantic capacity, but also a real willingness to thunder on thanks to forged titanium conrods, forged steel crank and titanium intake valves. 

Extensive weight saving measures were employed, including a one-speaker stereo (!) no boot carpet, thinner glass, a lighter battery, standard ceramic brakes, simpler headlights and even the removal of the tyre inflation kit. Not that it’d have any hope, really, against four 305-section Pirellis. While the Z/28 remained a large, heavy car at more than 1,700kg, the commitment to circuit speed was laudable. And proven, with a 7:37 Nurburgring lap. For a manual, naturally aspirated car of this stature - a Camaro, no less - that’s not bad going at all. 

The super sticky tyres will have helped, as will the brakes, plus the fitment of Multimatic DSSV dampers - a hugely expensive addition to a $75,000 Camaro. It was Chevrolet making the very best muscle car it could, and the Z/28 was mighty; check out the PH Rise & Drive video for proof… 

The 7.0-litre Camaro was only made for a few years, never to return, and now the Camaro nameplate has been retired. What always seemed significant is now even more so. Let’s not forget another key element of the Z/28’s appeal, either: it’s glowering good looks. It’s mean, moody and handsome as hell, the Z/28 aero additions front and rear making this the best looking Camaro of a very smart generation.

This one was brought to the UK by its first owner who’d grown very attached overseas, registered here in 2018 and with 14,000 miles under its wheels. It appears to want for nothing more than many gallons more super unleaded (the trip computer is reading 11mpg). Any buyer will, of course, have to deal with left-hand drive, and make their peace with an ordinary interior, but heck does the Z/28 have plenty in its favour as well. There are 7,011 reasons to buy one just under the bonnet…


SPECIFICATION | CHEVROLET CAMARO Z/28

Engine: 7,011cc, V8
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 505@6,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 481@4,800rpm
MPG: The ad says 15...
CO2: Erm
Year registered: 2018 (UK)
Recorded mileage: 14,314
Price new: $75,000
Yours for: £48,995

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

m62tu

Original Poster:

89 posts

56 months

Usually American imports are overpriced in the UK. This looks like a deal. Soon these will creep into six figures.

biggbn

27,818 posts

237 months

What a brilliant, brilliant thing. Can't believe I'm saying this but 50k seems cheap enough for what you are getting...

Abacus21

165 posts

52 months

All that weight saving and no attempt at the seats?

GreatScott2016

1,936 posts

105 months

I do love the screenshot of the average fuel “economy”! 11mpg yikes

ducnick

2,076 posts

260 months

GreatScott2016 said:
I do love the screenshot of the average fuel “economy”! 11mpg yikes
The computer is probably in US gallons. That’s just over 12 mpg in imperial gallons. That’s much more palatable;)

andy43

11,832 posts

271 months

biggbn said:
What a brilliant, brilliant thing. Can't believe I'm saying this but 50k seems cheap enough for what you are getting...
+1.
That seems like a bargain.
It’s the 7 litres that gets me - what else has been available from 2018 to today with a 7 litre V8?
I can’t think of anything that isn’t a super/hyper car.
And it’s a manual. I’ll be watching that video later. Loudly.

Picanto_superleggera

137 posts

28 months

Surely if there is only one speaker it is a mono?

biggbn

27,818 posts

237 months

ducnick said:
GreatScott2016 said:
I do love the screenshot of the average fuel “economy”! 11mpg yikes
The computer is probably in US gallons. That’s just over 12 mpg in imperial gallons. That’s much more palatable;)
I'll bet that an easy run sees over 20mpg, which is ok for a toy in my books!!

andy43

11,832 posts

271 months

I think it’ll be the sort of car where you’d have fun driving it at no more than tickover.

Every day a journey

2,421 posts

55 months

Wow.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,425 posts

115 months

I can imagine GM's notorious bean counters salivating at the thought that they only had to pay for one speaker.....

Krikkit

27,552 posts

198 months

Didn't Chris Harris own one of these and reckon it was fantastic?

Edit: Yes he did:

https://collectingcars.com/for-sale/2015-chevrolet...

fantheman80

2,092 posts

66 months

Abacus21 said:
All that weight saving and no attempt at the seats?
My eyes were drawn to them as well! Like ship Captain chairs

CountyLines

3,449 posts

20 months

These are insane in person. Proper mean looking things.

DaveyBoyWonder

3,252 posts

191 months

Abacus21 said:
All that weight saving and no attempt at the seats?
Doesn't make any difference when you drop a 20 stone American into them.

richinlondon

738 posts

139 months

ducnick said:
The computer is probably in US gallons. That’s just over 12 mpg in imperial gallons. That’s much more palatable;)
Just bought a 5.0 mustang and was pleasantly surprised at the economy - 22ish local / fun and a tad over 30 on a motorway run! Economical compared to this puppy!

DodgyGeezer

44,663 posts

207 months

that's a proper toy, and on a run, the fuel 'economy' won't be quite as ruinous as you might imagine (as someone said previously, I'd suspect, very, low 20s), which, for the performance potential, isn't bad at all. IMO the biggest downside to driving one of these (apart from conversations with random people) is the view out of the cabin is quite 'pillbox-like'.

Personally, there are 3 issues with this: it's black; it's manual (I love my autos); the Hellcat (though I have a sneaky suspicion that the 'Zee' may be easier to insure!)

minipower

936 posts

236 months

Never knew Multimatic did the suspension. Always assumed these had GM magride.

Can see US values much like the C7 ZR1 skyrocketing with these.


P1H

433 posts

165 months

Where is this nonsense coming from that cars are expensive in the UK, they obviously aren’t:

Base 911:
UK - from £103k
Ireland - from €206k
Netherlands - from €196k
US - from $132k (probably some state sales tax complexity)

Cars are extremely cheap in the UK.

Though there is a question about relative salary growth and consumer buying power.

rodericb

8,112 posts

143 months

DaveyBoyWonder said:
Abacus21 said:
All that weight saving and no attempt at the seats?
Doesn't make any difference when you drop a 20 stone American into them.
They are Recaro and look like they're out of some German sports cars of the era.

https://www.hotrod.com/reviews/2014-camaro-z28-for...