Magnecor v. Range Rover Classic (Lucas) leads?
Magnecor v. Range Rover Classic (Lucas) leads?
Author
Discussion

Tigertiger

Original Poster:

556 posts

262 months

Wednesday 5th October 2005
quotequote all

Thinking of replacing my leads and maybe coil as they are 6 years old now.

In the Bible, Steve chooses Lucas leads over Magnecor as they are a third of the price.

Are there obviously ie noticiable performance gains? I don't track my car just 'spirited' road use.

Could be my first step down the upgrade path...

>> Edited by Tigertiger on Wednesday 5th October 12:35

dodgyviper

1,213 posts

267 months

Wednesday 5th October 2005
quotequote all


Let battle commence

GreenV8S

31,017 posts

313 months

Wednesday 5th October 2005
quotequote all
No performance gains in terms of engine bhp/torque output when the leads are healthy. The main difference I can see is that the Magnecor leads withstand the heat better so they last much longer (effectively forever in my experience) before they break down. Depending how hot they get, the Lucas leads might start to break down within a few months/ couple of years. If they break down then this can lead to running problems, but the problem is knackered leads versus good rather than Lucas versus Magnecor.

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Wednesday 5th October 2005
quotequote all
Lucas leads on mine, cheap and do the job.