GT and Artura facelifts
GT and Artura facelifts
Author
Discussion

ex-devonpaul

Original Poster:

1,494 posts

154 months

Tuesday 9th September
quotequote all
My wife has decided we can go and look at McLarens. we're looking at a replacement for her Z4M but it needs to be as "useable", and preferably more comfortable.

The budget was top end 570GT/lower end GT, but with Emily Thornberry touting for Deputy Leader, Torsten Bell gaining influence, and a budget in a couple of months it seems sensible to get some cash out of pensions and spent, so an Artura is now a possibility.

I see some Arturas described as "facelift", some with "power upgrade", but am struggling to find what changes were made when. Are earlier cars less developed, is it easy to tell which are the updated ones? Were earlier ones updated?

Were there any significant changes during the GT's life cycle?

I like the idea of the Hybrid, but I believe the GT has more ground clrearance, something quite important on our dirt lane although a few tonnes of MOT every so often wouldn't add a lot to the running costs. I also gather the frunks are similar so the extra rear space in the GT would be a bonus and probably the clincher.

My discovery that Fedexing luggage to Europe was cheaper than adding it to a Ryanair flight after booking doesn't cut the mustard if we're driving down.

Thanks

samoht

6,678 posts

163 months

Tuesday 9th September
quotequote all

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/mclaren/artur...

Autocar said:
In addition to a new Spider drop-top bodystyle, then, the Artura now gets powertrain, suspension and interior updates for the 2025 model year.
The extra power is available for the original cars, but not the suspension or other improvements. The changes arrived with the Spider, so it's only Coupes which exist in two 'specs', launch vs MY25-on.


The GT was renamed the GTS last year, but my impression is the changes are vanishingly slight, AFAIK they're not significantly different across their production run.


I think I'd personally be aiming for a MY25 Artura Coupe as it's a newer car, unless you really need the extra luggage than the behind the seats + frunk of the Artura, or want the V8 engine specifically.

ChrisW.

7,724 posts

272 months

Tuesday 9th September
quotequote all
The power and firmware upgrades to older cars are free ... and I saw that the '25 model year cars built in '24 may have the suspension mods, though this could have been ambiguous description of a recent test car in the latter part of 2024 by the mag concerned.

It would appear that the 2025 cars are recognisable from the starter button being orange rather than red.

If my March 2024 build Artura is the "old" suspension, it is blooming good !!! It's also worth mentioning that ground clearance appears not to be a big problem and lift was part of a no cost option pack ??

naboo

139 posts

130 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I had a GT before my '24 Artura, for what it's worth here's some thoughts...

The GT's a stunning car, sounds great, easy to live with, lots of space although I rarely used it. The low down torque feels great, motorway cruising's a breeze, it's an odd blend of supercar and GT and feels very special on the road. When the GTS came out one of the McDealers tried to convince me it was a vast improvement over the GT, I'm not convinced but I like the new rear vent covers! There's a few serious GTS deals about the moment, maybe ex demo cars, huge discounts, definitely worth a look. For me the Artura's got more theatre, the looks are stunning, it just feels tighter, focused, more racey all round. I love the EV mode too, creeping out early morning without waking the street's a nice addition. I'd totally forgotten about the suspension upgrades, the '24 car handles amazingly well, but then all McLarens do that...

I'd get down to a dealer with both and compare.

Ken Figenus

5,958 posts

134 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Good summary above, and as an ex GT owner too.

I'd however suggest the Artura is a better GT as it is quieter in the cabin having far less glass to let noise in. It is a little firmer in comfort though but ground clearance is rarely an issue - I guess I'd lift it as often as I'd lift the GT, although in reality it does sit a touch lower. They are both excellent cars with the Arturas being a bit nimbler, smaller, pointier and faster. Try them both - I also love the hybrid tech personally as the car has a superb no lag immediacy and trundles perfectly on the motor in stop start traffic/queues. Mac friends say they see it absolutely take off from roundabouts and slip roads due to teh low down torque. I think it has motors on the turbos again helping to kill any lag - the engine is an engineering masterpiece IMHO but the GT sounds better, stock.

I couldn't make head or tail of the differences between 2025 coupes and 2024 ones - esp with the free power upgrade. I think its been kept obtuse. Its an excellent handling, pointy, tenacious car but the rear can feel a bit underdamped on rebound at times - say if there's a sharp ridge in the road coming off a roundabout under power - it can wallow a bit. I'll live with that as its rare.

Be aware McLaren want to charge you £940 for 1 rear Pirelli Cyber Tyres - fit better Michelins at £300 and you lose TPMS. Its an absolute stinkercurse. You generally cant get the Pirellis anywhere than the dealer frown

ChrisW.

7,724 posts

272 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I did find rears at £550 from Protyre but it's still a silly irritation for a tyre that does little more than any other TPMS tyre.

That and that working TPMS is a requirement for an MOT pass ... which could be a problem !

P.S. I agree on the rear being slightly underdamped in comfort mode over hump backed bridges etc ... but wonderful under most other circumstances smile