Principle Elevation question (car port)
Principle Elevation question (car port)
Author
Discussion

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Monday 22nd September
quotequote all
Going to build a car port - plan was for a lean-to (purple square) - that's the rear side of the house.

Front door, lounge windows etc, are all facing red arrow. Orange arrow is garage door direction

Now thinking of gravelling the red square area as it'll never get used for anything else, and the Mrs suggested, "why not put your car port there"

But I'm confused about the planning reg for permitted development, not helped by them trying to cover too many bases in one sentence,

"No part of the garage or car port can be in front of the principal or side elevation of the original house that faces onto a road. "

Too much in one sentence for me, "principle or side" - hey? which is it, front, and sides, front only? And my house doesn't face the road - so does that negate the rest of the sentence?.

Can anyone clarify for me.

My red square is on front of the principle elevation, but, it's off to the side, so is it in front ?




My initial feeling from reading again, and asking ChatGPT, is it's ok, as its not in front of the main elevation (yellow arrows), and not in front of the side facing the road (purple arrows)....



Edited by Griffith4ever on Monday 22 September 23:23

Sheepshanks

38,390 posts

138 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Not sure if serious….?

smokey mow

1,301 posts

219 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
From GDPO

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/permitt...

Principal elevation: in most cases the principal elevation will be that part of the house which fronts (directly or at an angle) the main highway serving the house (the main highway will be the one that sets the postcode for the house concerned). It will usually contain the main architectural features such as main bay windows or a porch serving the main entrance to the house. Usually, but not exclusively, the principal elevation will be what is understood to be the front of the house.

paddy1970

1,175 posts

128 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
A lean-to car port tucked behind the house (purple square) would normally be fine under PD.

Moving it forward into the red square area places it in front of the principal elevation line, which would trigger the need for a planning application.

You could ask the local planning duty officer with your sketch, so they can confirm in writing whether the red-square option is outside PD? That way you would have a defensible answer before committing.

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
Not sure if serious .?
Yes, very much so. Can you help?

I'm trying to clarify if "in front" of elevation is the same as "to one side" because my red box is in front of nothing, but it's to one side of both the front, and the side elevation.

I'm neither a planner or an architech, and I want to understand the wording better. Someone above has quoted exactly what I read on the planning site. The internet is awash with people asking for exactly the same clarification, with a lot of confusing answers.

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
smokey mow said:
From GDPO

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/permitt...

Principal elevation: in most cases the principal elevation will be that part of the house which fronts (directly or at an angle) the main highway serving the house (the main highway will be the one that sets the postcode for the house concerned). It will usually contain the main architectural features such as main bay windows or a porch serving the main entrance to the house. Usually, but not exclusively, the principal elevation will be what is understood to be the front of the house.
Yes, and reading that, my principal elevation is the long garden facing side of the house.

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
paddy1970 said:
A lean-to car port tucked behind the house (purple square) would normally be fine under PD.

Moving it forward into the red square area places it in front of the principal elevation line, which would trigger the need for a planning application.

You could ask the local planning duty officer with your sketch, so they can confirm in writing whether the red-square option is outside PD? That way you would have a defensible answer before committing.
Thanks. So there is an imaginary line that runs along the font of the house from road to garden end?

Antony Moxey

10,062 posts

238 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
"No part of the garage or car port can be in front of the principal or side elevation of the original house that faces onto a road." It's not an either/or statement, it's both elevations. Your car port does appear to flout both elevation rules so even if it were either/or you appear to be in breach of conditions. I'm not an expert though, just trying to interpret what I'm reading

PlywoodPascal

5,974 posts

40 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Principal elevation as front of house



Principal elevation as side of house



The front is normally the bit with the front door in but this isn t always facing the road.

Where you can t build:





Sheepshanks

38,390 posts

138 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Griffith4ever said:
Sheepshanks said:
Not sure if serious .?
Yes, very much so. Can you help?

I'm trying to clarify if "in front" of elevation is the same as "to one side" because my red box is in front of nothing, but it's to one side of both the front, and the side elevation.

I'm neither a planner or an architech, and I want to understand the wording better. Someone above has quoted exactly what I read on the planning site. The internet is awash with people asking for exactly the same clarification, with a lot of confusing answers.
TBH it reads pretty obviously to me. “In front” means ahead of your house. It doesn’t mean literally plonked in front of your house. I don’t know if it’s an official term but there’s what’s known as the building line, and that runs boundary to boundary. You can’t use PD to build beyond that.

And it clearly says both front and side, if they’re both facing roads. Like a house on a corner would do.

TA14

13,608 posts

277 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
TBH it reads pretty obviously to me. In front means...
It also seems obvious that the purple box is a far better place to build your lean to/car port/soon to become a garage with storage/workshop behind and close access to the house.

kambites

70,194 posts

240 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Principle Elevation certainly can be ambiguous (and/or nonsensical) under some circumstances, but this doesn't appear to be one of them!

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
PlywoodPascal said:
Principal elevation as front of house



Principal elevation as side of house



The front is normally the bit with the front door in but this isn t always facing the road.

Where you can t build:



Lovely! Thanks

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
TA14 said:
Sheepshanks said:
TBH it reads pretty obviously to me. In front means...
It also seems obvious that the purple box is a far better place to build your lean to/car port/soon to become a garage with storage/workshop behind and close access to the house.
Indeed but I was looking at options - mostly as the red box location would mean I would not be blocking my workshop doors with my car and it would also create a nice visibility barrier from the lane

But it is (lean to down the side) most likely what will happen - I have a couple of issues with a heating flue, but that is not insurmountable.

TA14

13,608 posts

277 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
If you did want the red box option I would have thought that PP was a possibility with the trees and orientation of next door's house. (I'm not a planning expert.)

Sheepshanks

38,390 posts

138 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
TA14 said:
If you did want the red box option I would have thought that PP was a possibility with the trees and orientation of next door's house. (I'm not a planning expert.)
Yes - and, while the pictures aren’t great, things don’t look particularly organised in the road. It’s not like a modern estate where there’s a continuous building line that planners wouldn’t want breached, but even then you see houses pulled forward, as my house has been from a gable end facing the road.

Say it’s for an EV - that might please them. You could you want it separate from the house in case it bursts into flames.

TA14

13,608 posts

277 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
Say it s for an EV - that might please them. You could you want it separate from the house in case it bursts into flames.
rofl

Cow Corner

680 posts

49 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
TA14 said:
If you did want the red box option I would have thought that PP was a possibility with the trees and orientation of next door's house. (I'm not a planning expert.)
Indeed, It’s often better to try and get planning permission for what you want, rather than designing a compromise to fit into permitted development.

Usual caveats apply in terms of seeking professional advice and your specific circumstances.

You can always revert to the PD option if it become clear getting planning isn’t feasible (assuming you have PD rights…).

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
TA14 said:
Sheepshanks said:
Say it s for an EV - that might please them. You could you want it separate from the house in case it bursts into flames.
rofl
Too funny!

Griffith4ever

Original Poster:

5,967 posts

54 months

Tuesday 23rd September
quotequote all
Cow Corner said:
Indeed, It s often better to try and get planning permission for what you want, rather than designing a compromise to fit into permitted development.

Usual caveats apply in terms of seeking professional advice and your specific circumstances.

You can always revert to the PD option if it become clear getting planning isn t feasible (assuming you have PD rights ).
Cheers (and to all). TBH - I was spitballing the idea. Way too much on my hands with the move / remodelling / prebooked winter escape / business to run. Going to cover the car for this winter, then deal with the car port next spring.