RE: Mercedes SLK 350 | Shed of the Week
RE: Mercedes SLK 350 | Shed of the Week
Today

Mercedes SLK 350 | Shed of the Week

Looking for a manual, rear-drive roadster with more than 250hp? Check out the road less travelled...


You might think it’s the wrong time of year for a two-seater convertible, and it probably is, but when a 268hp Mercedes SLK 350 pops up at under £2k, the least you can do is pay it some attention. Especially when it’s a gen-two R171 with a manual gearbox, a mooed-up cabin and no obvious faults. 

Our R171 is from 2004, the first year of that model’s sales. It’s done 112,000 miles in total, equivalent to not much more than 5,000 a year. So far so good, but as you know Shed’s life has been a litany of disappointments, the most recent being the discovery that the vicar had part-ex’d him a car that was even more clocked than the one Shed had sold him. 

With that in mind, he was fully prepared for bad news on this Merc’s MOT history. To his surprise, however, the last test in July showed nothing worse than light wear to a front suspension bush. That had pinged up on the 2024 and 2023 tests, too. Apart from a bit of seatbelt anchor point plating in 2020, a warning light in 2019 and replacement front springs in 2014 and 2015 it’s been consumables all the way for MOT advisories dating back to 2007. 

The front end does need to do some heavy lifting on these SLK 350s because the M272 3.5-litre 24-valve 90-degree V6 was a chunky unit. A pokey one too. Despite the lack of turbo assistance, it pumped out 268hp at a rasping 6,000rpm, with 258lb ft on tap from 2,500-5,000rpm, so even by 2025 standards it will feel pleasingly rapid. Finding one of these with the six-speed manual gearbox is a rare occurrence, mainly because Merc manuals erred more towards function than fun and this one was no different. In fact, possibly, Shed maintains that the SLK after this one, the R172, was the last ever manual Mercedes. 

Whether that’s true or not, what is true is that the 7G-Tronic automatic version of the R171 SLK 350 covered off the 0-62mph in 5.5 seconds, 0.1 seconds less than a skilled and probably sweating driver needed to achieve the same feat behind the wheel of the manual. On the positive side, the 1,465kg manual SLK was 20kg lighter than the auto, which gave it a soupcon more delicacy on the handling front. As Shed said while he was showing a landscape picture of Mrs Shed from the rear to a recently discovered cousin, it’s all relative. Though the SLK 350 was rear-wheel drive with staggered 17-inch wheels (7.5 front, 8.5 rear) it wasn’t nearly as precise to drive as Porsche’s Boxster. Nevertheless, if the phrase ‘refined boulevardier’ appeared higher up your new car wishlist than ‘ring dominator’ you’d be chuffed with your choice. 

Owners generally like their R171s. It was better built inside and out than the R170, and the folding roof was pretty reliable, even on the gen-one. Thanks to Mrs Shed’s dextrous saucepan-wielding, Shed is accustomed to the idea of metal coming swiftly over his head, so he likes the fact that the R171’s steel top deployed three seconds quicker than the previous R170’s. More usefully, perhaps, the newer car provided an extra 63 litres of luggage space to boot, or indeed in the boot. Shed isn’t sure if this car would have had the then-new Airscarf neck-warmer as standard. 

The 350’s combined fuel consumption was just under 27mpg with high 30s obtainable on a cruise. Today, the emissions figure of 255g/km conveniently keeps it out of the dearest band of vehicle excise duty beginning at 256g/km, but that just means you’ll be paying £710 a year instead of £735. There’s a fly in many an ointment, two or three if you’re Shed. It’s a shame, but you can’t have everything. 

The good news is that the vendors are giving you a three-month warranty to go with the car’s full service history. That’s good because pre-2008 examples of the M272 engine did suffer from balance shaft and intake manifold issues. Rust can and will attack the rear subframes. Same goes for the front wings, and they’re not cheap to replace. The roof can rattle, but that’s generally easily fixed by the application of Gummi Pflege, a mysterious substance that nobody understands.

The vendors also say that ‘first to see will buy’. If by some strange magic that phrase was actually true Shed would be inviting that blooming vicar round to his yard for a special viewing.


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

pSyCoSiS

Original Poster:

3,949 posts

222 months

Fantastic Shed this week. This will be a lot of fun to drive.

I had an R120 SLK 320 manual during lockdown, and it was a nippy little thing, entertaining on the back roads.

This will be more refined, more powerful and with better technology. Air scarf is a nice touch.

Yes, not as composed as the Boxster, but you won't get one a fully functioning one of those easily for under £2k.

Edited by pSyCoSiS on Friday 26th September 01:57

Wren-went

991 posts

55 months

Back in 05 I had an earlier 51 plate SLK 230 K, never really got on with it so after 9 months or so off it went, but this SLK for shed money could be a decent buy.

For the money if I was buying it, it would be used purely in the summer, hopefully sometime buys this & gives an old Merc the love it deserves.

JRaj

84 posts

90 months

Mini SLR looks, Silver Arrow! Looks like it's sold!

chirurgus

353 posts

233 months

That’s a great shed and one I would consider if I needed a cheap run around that was also entertaining. We had a 20 year old R170 briefly as a cheap car when I first emigrated and it was fun to drive in the Australian summer. At the time, I thought the R171 was a better looking car than the R170. However, the original has grown on me and the second generation really looks dated now.
The hydraulic roofs on the R170 (and probably the R171 too) are not as reliable as suggested by shed. The OEM hydraulic oil attacks the rubber seals in the hydraulic rams, so they can leak when the pump is running. Also, the microswitches can become sticky or even fail, so the pump continues to run even once the roof is closed. This finishes the job that the oil started.
MB in Sydney charge $4k to replace the “unserviceable” hydraulic rams. The alternative is to replace the seals yourself for the grand sum of about £50. That includes 20 Euros for a pack of rubber seals from German eBay, a few pounds for some 2mm drill bits and a ridiculous price for some hydraulic oil from MB themselves. There are plenty of YouTube videos describing how to dismantle the “sealed for life” rams and then reassemble them with new seals. It just takes a few hours labour and a little bravery.
As for M272 V6 balance shafts, there are several websites that can determine if a particular car is at risk from the VIN. Some 2008 cars have the revised engine.

can't remember

1,104 posts

145 months

I've no idea why people continue to knock one out for manual boxes in cars with low revving, lumpen V6s that were designed to be autos. That said, it's a decent car for the money.

yme402

556 posts

119 months

A metal folding roof will bit you on the bum at some point. But at Shed money who cares?
Personally, a BMW E85 is far more purposeful looking than one of these.

Rich1973

1,245 posts

194 months

N/S front wing is a different shade to the door.
I read the line as 'from the rear end of a cousin'. Had to read it again!

2smoke

232 posts

128 months

Seems reasonably priced.
Being a 2004 I think the road tax would be £430, which might make it more of a bargain than described.
Just make sure you test the hell out of that roof before handing over your hard earned.

Edited by 2smoke on Friday 26th September 06:53

FrankandLynn

34 posts

10 months

I’m constantly amazed at how cheap these motors are, but this one looks an absolute steal. Great barge for meandering around in on a sunny afternoon and then stash it away every October until next spring. ‘The definition of ‘champagne living at lemonade prices’.

el romeral

1,723 posts

154 months

What a great find this week. I would never have thought that these would have fallen into shed territory. This and the V10 Touareg could form quite a two car garage for under four grand.

V 02

2,349 posts

77 months

Rather nice!

BeastieBoy73

741 posts

129 months

Wife had a gen one SLK and I never bonded well with it.
It had the vaguest manual gearbox I’d ever used (though she had a MX5, previously, and the manual in those is brilliant). The seats were also uncomfortable.

LightweightLouisDanvers

2,595 posts

60 months

I like that, would prefer if it was an auto but at that price you'd not complain. Perfect summer car, as an earlier poster said, put it away over winter and drive something mundane during the bad weather.
Great shed.

POIDH

2,114 posts

82 months

Well I would.
That's a great shed.

V12GT

539 posts

107 months

Very nice. Sadly sold before 8am today though.

cerb4.5lee

38,579 posts

197 months

This is right up my street with it being a V6, a manual and RWD for sure. It looks good for the money too, count me in please.

cerb4.5lee

38,579 posts

197 months

can't remember said:
I've no idea why people continue to knock one out for manual boxes in cars with low revving, lumpen V6s that were designed to be autos. That said, it's a decent car for the money.
I think it is a difficult one really, and the auto in my old E90 330i didn't suit the N52 engine much at all for me. So a manual would've improved the experience in that I think, even though BMW manuals are mostly crap too.

Mike1990

1,096 posts

148 months

Always liked the SLR inspired nose.

georgeyboy12345

4,017 posts

52 months

Yay - 3.5 V6, long MOT

Boo - £710 a year tax, rust

WPA

12,391 posts

131 months

These rust for a passion and yet another car that is killed stone dead by the RFL