RE: Mazda MX-5 (ND2) | Cars to be thankful for
RE: Mazda MX-5 (ND2) | Cars to be thankful for
Saturday 11th October

Mazda MX-5 (ND2) | Cars to be thankful for

A lightweight, manual roadster with rear-drive and modest power - the MX-5 should have been here ages ago...


Nothing validates a concept quite like an enduring fitness for purpose. That the ND Mazda MX-5 is now 10 years old, yet feels more desirable than ever, assuredly says something of the contemporary enthusiast car market. But it also points to what a superb job Mazda did in honing its vision of a roadster for a modern world. While significantly updated in 2018 (and modestly fettled last year), this is, to most intents and purposes, the machine that launched in 2015. Despite all that time, the little Mazda remains stylish, relevant, well-conceived and, perhaps most importantly, enormous fun. ‘The answer to everything’ might be underselling its significance, if anything… 

Back in 2015, having a car as simple and as slight as the fourth-generation MX-5 - a model smaller and lighter than its predecessor, remember - was a welcome addition to a bustling enthusiast marketplace. It felt like a worthwhile update of a familiar formula, eminently recommendable for those who wanted a bit of drop-top fun and a step in the right direction as far as weight and complexity was concerned.  

A few things have changed since then. The first is that the MX-5 became better and better from its auspicious start; the power boost in 2018 really woke the 2.0-litre Skyactiv four-pot up, and last year’s refresh, significant for the introduction of a new diff and the Competition ESC mode, reinvigorated the handling. In other words, it is better than it’s ever been. The second important change, you'll hardly be surprised to hear, is the decimation of the affordable performance segment in the past decade, leaving the Mazda as a proper beacon of hope that this type of car remains viable despite the constant angst around sales volumes, safety and emissions. 

When the ND was launched, two-seat alternatives were plentiful. Hot hatches were abundant. Now, even at £10,000 more than the original RRP (or sadly only a few hundred quid more than the 2015 price, adjusted for inflation), there’s really nothing like the MX-5. Which is sad. We’re at the point where a 177hp Skoda Fabia is £30k, remember, so quite frankly it feels like Mazda can charge what it wants. 

Yet despite all of that, it can seem that the MX-5 doesn’t enjoy the recognition it deserves. Imagine now if an established carmaker came out with a 1,000kg, 7,500rpm, rear-drive roadster that looked great and cost less than £35,000; the bunfight would be akin to the GR86 all over again. But because this is just an MX-5, because it looks just as it has for 10 years (only the keenest will note the latest headlight design), enthusiasm feels modest at best. 

It shouldn’t - this thing is an unmitigated joy. Some of it is nostalgia-driven, no doubt, given its length of service. For me, wedged into a Mk4, even one with a much smarter new screen than it first had, immediately brings back the middle of the last decade: driving the North Coast 500 for the first time, or driving down to Brighton from a south London flat just because, or driving to meet girls I was desperately trying to impress (and failing to). There was always an MX-5, and it was always great. But it turns out there’s far more than just rose-tinted appeal to the MX-5 interior, because it still works an absolute treat. We all know how interior design has changed since 2015 - mostly not for the better - and the MX-5 serves as a perfect reminder of what’s been lost. That trio of HVAC controls is simple and stylish, ditto the driver’s dials, and if the infotainment dial isn’t really far enough forward, then the functionality is spot on. The wheel would look and feel fantastic even to those who aren’t familiar; it’s impossible to miss the heated seat button. No wonder little has changed. 

It would be easy to say that nothing has changed in the way the ND drives, either, but that wouldn’t really be accurate. Early cars really did miss a bit of fizz in the powertrain and stability from the chassis; turning everything off always felt more adventurous than it should have, given the layout. The steering was a bit glassy, and the car was too keen to flop into oversteer at the merest hint of load. 

This latest car is most certainly familiar, yet also markedly improved. It’s more secure and more precise, without totally abandoning the easygoing attitude. The new asymmetric diff introduced last year was an important change: ‘Strengthening the slip limiting force when the unloaded rear wheel is lightened during cornering enhances stability’, was Mazda’s quote; the introduction of the Competition mid-way mode for the ESC aimed for a ‘more dynamic, yet secure, drive experience’. And the steering was meant to do away with some friction - it did. Together, those changes make for a front-engined, rear-drive car that’s much simpler and safer, yet just as engaging. Harmless, wonderful little squiggles from roundabouts and out of slow corners feel too natural to go without. 

What the MX-5 is not, however, is the last word in tacked-down dynamic bandwidth. Which is arguably what it should never be. But it can certainly be found wanting over pockmarked surfaces and significant elevation changes, the torsional rigidity and damping exposed just a little. Nevertheless, that criticism misses the point somewhat; an MX-5 could be stiffer, but then it would be heavier, and the effervescence of a 1,050kg roadster would be at risk. Far better a small sports car with exploitable, well telegraphed dynamic extremities than some aloof grip monster. Moreover, it’s easy to look more fondly on the drive (and some of its drawbacks) without any direct rivals; even allowing for that leniency, anyone who loves driving won’t leave the MX-5 unamused, be that from the cammy bark of the engine, the perfectly weighted gearshift, the firmness of the brake pedal or the lovely transition between grip and slip. 

It feels, and this is intended very much as a compliment, like a classic car. Such is the way of the world now that the MX-5 has become the classic drop-top its makers wanted a new car to evoke from the start. Surrounded in the marketplace by overcomplicated, overwrought and overpriced performance cars, the Mazda is a return to a simpler time. And the appeal is enormous. It might shake, rattle and roll a bit, but at least that means you’re never accidentally doing 85mph; the engine needs revs for its best, rather than dumping torque in your lap at 1,800rpm, yet reaching peak power at 7,000rpm is never a chore; and modest dimensions that can make you feel a tad vulnerable are a boon on a country lane. Granted, the hot hatch crowd probably won’t get it, and you might worry about rust in a few years, but there is a host of upgrades available from established third parties to move Mazda's game on. The MX-5 couldn’t cosplay as a classic any better if it tried.  

Yet it comes with all the benefits of a new car as well. It officially does more than 40mpg, it’s not going to overheat, phone pairing is a cinch and it’ll cruise along the motorway without too much drama. Not so long ago, the ND felt like a really good MX-5, but little more; in 2025, as so many others have fallen by the wayside, it seems nothing less than a celebration of all that’s truly great about driving. To experience a fizzy little 2.0-litre with a great six-speed manual and a game chassis, to know that it remains available to anyone with the wherewithal, definitely helps alleviate some of the gloom associated with a car obsession in 2025. Which is what the MX-5 experience has always been about, only now its virtues have never been shown off better, nor seemed more valid. Nobody really needs 10 stages of traction control, adjustable brake feel or variable steering weight in a road car - they need this. 

Which is probably why the ND fundamentals haven’t changed much since it first arrived all those years ago. In case there was previously any doubt, there really is nothing quite like a small, fast(ish), light, rear-drive roadster; ask anyone with a Lotus Elan or similar for proof of that. To have that fun still around brand new feels like a real privilege, a Mazda, finally, to properly cherish. Everything rumoured about the MX-5’s future would suggest its maker is very keen for the uncomplicated bliss of its most famous car to continue as well, which must be good news. If only a few others could follow suit…


SPECIFICATION | 2025 MAZDA MX-5 2.0 ROADSTER EXCLUSIVE LINE

Engine: 1,998cc 4-cyl
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 184@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 151@4,000rpm
0-62mph: 6.5sec
Top speed: 136mph
Weight: 1,128kg (including 75kg driver)
MPG: 41.5mpg (WLTP combined)
CO2: 153g/km
Price: £33,415 (price as standard; price as tested £34,265 with Soul Red Metallic paint)

Author
Discussion

GTEYE

Original Poster:

2,296 posts

228 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I was seriously thinking of buying an ND MX-5 as a third fun car, and really enjoyed it when I tried one. However, the only real issue, it’s just a bit “too” small in the cabin.

So I went a slightly different route and bought a GR86. A fair bit more dynamic than the Mazda, not so much fresh air but it’s a superb car none the less. I don’t regret it, and the hold their value really well too.

ChevronB19

8,516 posts

181 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Looks so much better with the changed DRLs. Wife had an ND v1 RF, which was good, but to be honest I was never happy with the handling, I preferred my old NC.

wistec1

667 posts

59 months

Saturday
quotequote all
This reminds me to get a test drive. The mx 5 has been on my bucket list for years and the box will most likely be ticked on my next Euro trip. Excellent editorial and recognition what is evidently a great car.

edoverheels

501 posts

123 months

Saturday
quotequote all
It was so impressive when Mazda managed to keep it the same size and weight as the originals whilst all around them fattened up. We had an ND for a while and whilst I loved the concept I never gelled with it. I think it was the steering. We also had an NA which was a great car but that was modified.
I am sure that as the supply of interesting cars dries up I will end up with another and will modify that but will the steering still be a bit lifeless? Is the steering on the most recent ones any better?

Jamescrs

5,542 posts

83 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Amazed that this car was released 10 years ago, certainly doesn't feel it and to me it still looks very fresh and modern

Spencer Barratt

11 posts

109 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I love the ND2, also a well sorted NC and a NB. One of my top 3 cars I have ever driven. You get so much for such little money, the handling limit is mind blowing and I have had Ferrari s, Porsche s, but a MX5 always remains a favourite with one in the garage at all times.

Edited by Spencer Barratt on Saturday 11th October 08:02

dxg

9,697 posts

278 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Erm, all the pictures in the article are of the ND3. Did I miss something?

(And they contain the worst crime against humanity: the rear numberplate is squint).

dunnoreally

1,347 posts

126 months

Saturday
quotequote all
The MX-5 is the last vestige of the cheap, light, analogue sports car. I hope to blazes that they keep making them.

dxg

9,697 posts

278 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Well, the latest is that the next MX-5 will be a joint venture with Toyota and will also be the new GR86.

So, unless they do two different wheelbases, not sure what that means for the MX... :/

(And I'm not sure you can call even an MX5 cheap anymore - have you seen the new prices?!?!)

Mafioso

2,386 posts

232 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I've had my 2 litre since new in 2015 (and did the BBR Super 200 conversion in 2020). I've now got my father's 987 Boxster S on permanent loan as he's had a new 4 litre GTS this week and I need to decide which one to keep... Tough decision.

edo111s

228 posts

243 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Nice article! Yes the mx5 needs a celebration.
I ve been enjoying my ND2 for 6 years and wouldn t dream a change.
Yes my Elise and GT86 drove better
but the mx5 is the ultimate usable 2 seater roadster for regular wallets.
Long it may live.

Edited by edo111s on Saturday 11th October 08:42

TristPerrin

147 posts

196 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Bought mine new in 2021 after a string of hot hatches and I don't think ill ever get rid of it.

It doesn't get driven nearly enough as its effectively a third car after a work van an a tip run Mazda6 estate, but every time I start it up it reminds me why I love it.

I took it down to the Swiss Alps a few weeks ago and it was an absolute blast. Quick enough to be fun and driven hard but never too fast to really open it up on the roads.

The light weight and just about enough power for the roads is a huge part of the appeal. My little MX5 was up and down the mountains for nearly 6 hours without missing a beat, but my uncles tuned JCW Mini (the go kart as he calls it) really struggled to keep the brakes and engine cool on the same roads. The MX5 did become a bit tedious on the 750 mile trip home on the French motorways however...

The only downside I can come up with is the boring colour options from Mazda. I plan to wrap mine a nice dark green shade and maybe add a BBR Super 200 package one day.


S600BSB

6,805 posts

124 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Never got on with the ND, so still keep a sorted NC in the garage for sunny days. The only car I prefer driving is my A110 GT.

nismo48

5,640 posts

225 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Nice write up of a very good car that I'm glad to have had the pleasure of owning.

cerb4.5lee

38,920 posts

198 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Your write up makes me want to buy one now Matt! I've always really liked this generation of MX-5, and I'd definitely like a go in one. driving

Oiyou

132 posts

124 months

Saturday
quotequote all
All NDs are great. I had an early 1.5 that was a hoot. Only regret is that I discovered track days once I'd gotten rid of it for something bigger.

I do however remember the road noise being absolutely appalling pretty much all of the time. Drown out the radio bad. Maybe a combo of lowering springs and the Yokohama tyres?

Water Fairy

6,238 posts

173 months

Saturday
quotequote all
My youngest at 19 just bought himself a one owner 45k miles 1999 MK2 in near mint condition for 4.5k. Just fitted a roll bar at his mother request.

It's a very nice thing but too slow for me.

cerb4.5lee

38,920 posts

198 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Water Fairy said:
My youngest at 19 just bought himself a one owner 45k miles 1999 MK2 in near mint condition for 4.5k. Just fitted a roll bar at his mother request.

It's a very nice thing but too slow for me.
I've always thought that about the earlier generations, but I could live with this one at 0 to 60 in 6.5 seconds though I think. My F56 Cooper S was 6.8 seconds to 60, and it was only on the longer straights where I was craving more performance from it, but for the rest of the time it was fun to be fair to it.

snorkel sucker

2,696 posts

221 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I have a 2015 ND1 2.0 which I bought in June this year. Daily is a company car EV which is quick but utterly soulless.

The MX5 is everything the EV isn't and even a brief drive blows the cobwebs away from a crappy work week.

Only after a few weeks ownership it took me over to the Nurburgring for my first visit, did several laps including a TF stint on the GP track. It's also recently done a trackday at Oulton Park.

It isn't fast, albeit fast enough for road use, but it's engaging and satisfying even for someone like me who is happy to drive well within their limits.

I'd like to have it lowered as it does like to lean a lot when pushed hard, and longer term if I keep it I'd definitely look to BBR as I think at circa 200bhp/ton it would be a very sweet car.

A word of advice to anyone getting one - check the geo. First thing I did and it transformed the car. As it was, it was an understeering, sketchy mess. With a decent geo setup and decent tyres its now pointy and able to carry a lot more speed.


sideways man

1,564 posts

155 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Great article, and thanks Mazda for still making them. Thoroughly enjoyed my NA and I’ll probably get an RF one day.