Wildcat helicopter as a sniper platform
Wildcat helicopter as a sniper platform
Author
Discussion

100SRV

Original Poster:

2,279 posts

260 months

Reading a news report where the RN and RM intercepted then stopped a skiff by a sniper shot at the outboard motor I was intrigued by this comment from the pilot: Being the Wildcat pilot carrying out a live weapons firing on drug-running skiffs whilst flying backwards to provide a stable platform for the snipers was definitely a career highlight"

Why would flying backwards make the helicopter more stable?
Windy conditions on that day perhaps?

Edited by 100SRV on Sunday 12th October 16:23

WH16

7,499 posts

236 months

The shooter is probably sitting facing backwards, rather than the helicopter flying backwards.

Tony1963

5,775 posts

180 months

WH16 said:
The shooter is probably sitting facing backwards, rather than the helicopter flying backwards.
In which case the pilot wouldn’t refer to it as a career highlight.

Phud

1,371 posts

161 months

Having the helo move rather than hover makes a more stable and predicable platform, sat in the hover there are always small adjustments which would give issues to a sniper.

As for highlight, I can understand that, not often you get to do a live mission

Jimbo.

4,126 posts

207 months

I doubt I could hit a cows arse with a banjo. Yet here we have someone successfully shooting a small outboard on a moving boat, from a moving helicopter. Got to admire the skills and training there!

WH16

7,499 posts

236 months

Tony1963 said:
WH16 said:
The shooter is probably sitting facing backwards, rather than the helicopter flying backwards.
In which case the pilot wouldn t refer to it as a career highlight.
I guess, it's just a bit ambiguously worded. (or maybe I just read it wrong).

eharding

14,576 posts

302 months

Jimbo. said:
I doubt I could hit a cows arse with a banjo. Yet here we have someone successfully shooting a small outboard on a moving boat, from a moving helicopter. Got to admire the skills and training there!
Compare and contrast with the Septics, who also doubt they could hit a cow's arse with a banjo, but absolutely will have a go at hitting a cow's arse (or some Venezuelans) with a $300K AGM-179 JAGM missile (vs the Royal Marines outlay of a fiver on a round of .338 Lapua Magnum or whatever they're using nowadays)

rodericb

8,229 posts

144 months

Yesterday (09:06)
quotequote all
eharding said:
Jimbo. said:
I doubt I could hit a cows arse with a banjo. Yet here we have someone successfully shooting a small outboard on a moving boat, from a moving helicopter. Got to admire the skills and training there!
Compare and contrast with the Septics, who also doubt they could hit a cow's arse with a banjo, but absolutely will have a go at hitting a cow's arse (or some Venezuelans) with a $300K AGM-179 JAGM missile (vs the Royal Marines outlay of a fiver on a round of .338 Lapua Magnum or whatever they're using nowadays)
The cost versus benefit of deterrence.

You clever kippers could have just paid a local lad fifty quid to steal the boats sparkplug leads instead of keeping a helicopter in the air for hours........

Joe M

771 posts

263 months

Yesterday (14:16)
quotequote all
Shows the stark difference of how we deal with drug runners compared to the USA

aeropilot

38,765 posts

245 months

Yesterday (14:38)
quotequote all
100SRV said:
Reading a news report where the RN and RM intercepted then stopped a skiff by a sniper shot at the outboard motor I was intrigued by this comment from the pilot: Being the Wildcat pilot carrying out a live weapons firing on drug-running skiffs whilst flying backwards to provide a stable platform for the snipers was definitely a career highlight"

Why would flying backwards make the helicopter more stable?
I think its more the case that the sniper is likely sitting in one of the rear seats by the door with the AI pointed forward out of the door, so, going backwards, means the helo is moving but moving very slowly (instead of hovering) thus providing a more stable condition for the Marin to hit the outboard motor.
Its one hell of a shot though.

Edited by aeropilot on Monday 13th October 16:35

POIDH

2,189 posts

83 months

Yesterday (16:28)
quotequote all
100SRV said:
Being the Wildcat pilot carrying out a live weapons firing on drug-running skiffs whilst flying backwards to provide a stable platform for the snipers was definitely a career highlight"
Reports now emerging that the pilot and sniper may be the same person... wink




normalbloke

8,206 posts

237 months

Yesterday (17:06)
quotequote all

Back for tea and medals. Anyone recognise the weapon? I’ve heard it’s something from Accuracy International but I don’t recognise it.

junglie

2,031 posts

235 months

Yesterday (17:30)
quotequote all
You want the contact on the right hand side of the aircraft so the pilot can see it and use it as a reference.

Sniper also (usually) on right hand side.

Flying backwards - probably to keep the aircraft into wind, maximising available power, whilst batting a fire control solution.

Tony1963

5,775 posts

180 months

Yesterday (17:48)
quotequote all
normalbloke said:

Back for tea and medals. Anyone recognise the weapon? I ve heard it s something from Accuracy International but I don t recognise it.
Barrett M82 .50 cal, anti-materiel rather than for neutralising operatives.



I think.

normalbloke

8,206 posts

237 months

Yesterday (18:06)
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
normalbloke said:

Back for tea and medals. Anyone recognise the weapon? I ve heard it s something from Accuracy International but I don t recognise it.
Barrett M82 .50 cal, anti-materiel rather than for neutralising operatives.



I think.
My initial thoughts were Barrett when I heard the story, but it doesn’t look ‘right’. I’m no expert, just curious, and look forward to finding out for sure.

aeropilot

38,765 posts

245 months

Yesterday (18:22)
quotequote all
normalbloke said:

Back for tea and medals. Anyone recognise the weapon? I ve heard it s something from Accuracy International but I don t recognise it.
Yep, its a Accuracy International AX50 in .50 BMG with suppressor. Serious bit of kit.

Tony1963

5,775 posts

180 months

Yesterday (18:43)
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Yep, its a Accuracy International AX50 in .50 BMG with suppressor. Serious bit of kit.




clap



normalbloke

8,206 posts

237 months

Yesterday (19:17)
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
normalbloke said:

Back for tea and medals. Anyone recognise the weapon? I ve heard it s something from Accuracy International but I don t recognise it.
Yep, its an Accuracy International AX50 in .50 BMG with suppressor. Serious bit of kit.
Thank you. I’m not sure he even let off a round. With the length of it with the suppressor on, I’m sure he just leant out and nudged the kill switch on the skiff….

TGCOTF-dewey

6,783 posts

73 months

Yesterday (19:40)
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
normalbloke said:

Back for tea and medals. Anyone recognise the weapon? I ve heard it s something from Accuracy International but I don t recognise it.
Yep, its a Accuracy International AX50 in .50 BMG with suppressor. Serious bit of kit.
Slightly off topic, I've always found it incongruous given the UK's strict firearms laws that you can legally own and shoot 50 cal BMG chambered rifle.