Campaign for paid leave for IVF treatment
Campaign for paid leave for IVF treatment
Author
Discussion

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

5,299 posts

101 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
On the BBC today

Should people get this for what is an emotionally horrific, and what can be a long and painful and often futile and heartbreaking journey

Or is it a life choice to pursue and should be done on annual leave allowance and special dispensation without pay.

Difficult one but not sure how I would feel if a small business owner or if if it's something the tax burden should pick up with the advance of workers rights to the detriment of the economy, hammering many of us with envy/hard work taxes yet downright refusal to tackle completely unsustainable monsters like the welfare bill and it's exponential growth and NHS reform amongst others.


Countdown

45,772 posts

215 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I don't think it should be paid for by others.

I also don't think IVF should be paid for by the NHS.

oyster

13,283 posts

267 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I’m against paid leave for people having IVF simply because they’ve made a lifestyle choice to have children later in life.

Just like NHS funding guidance, there would need to be a limit on paid leave, such as only available up to age 35.


90CHPAXL

1,190 posts

122 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
oyster said:
I m against paid leave for people having IVF simply because they ve made a lifestyle choice to have children later in life.

Just like NHS funding guidance, there would need to be a limit on paid leave, such as only available up to age 35.
To blanket judge everyone as having "made a choice" to have children later in life is abhorrent

ARH

1,350 posts

258 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Next we will be asking for annual leave, for the time needed conceive naturally. smile

Mind you, who's going to book 3 minutes holiday rofl

oyster

13,283 posts

267 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
90CHPAXL said:
oyster said:
I m against paid leave for people having IVF simply because they ve made a lifestyle choice to have children later in life.

Just like NHS funding guidance, there would need to be a limit on paid leave, such as only available up to age 35.
To blanket judge everyone as having "made a choice" to have children later in life is abhorrent
Why?

I went through IVF. It would never have occurred to us to want paid leave.

s1962a

6,899 posts

181 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I'm all for this. We should be encouraging people to have babies.

See Japan.

MajorMantra

1,608 posts

131 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
oyster said:
I m against paid leave for people having IVF simply because they ve made a lifestyle choice to have children later in life.
People have IVF because they're unable to conceive naturally otherwise. If you knew anything about the process, you would never describe it as a 'lifestyle choice', which is remarkably crass.

I wouldn't wish IVF on anyone, but I'm very grateful for my son, who wouldn't have been born without it.

Yes, people should get paid leave, and they should also be educated about what IVF is, and how it works.

tim0409

5,424 posts

178 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
My wife and I tried IVF (privately funded) around 15 years ago (unsuccessfully). It was fairly traumatic and I had pretty much wiped it from my memory until I read this thread. We wouldn't have even thought about paid leave to go through the process, we (my wife really) just got on with it.

Leon R

3,582 posts

115 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Countdown said:
I don't think it should be paid for by others.

I also don't think IVF should be paid for by the NHS.
We often don’t see things the same way but I am 100% with you on this.

theplayingmantis

Original Poster:

5,299 posts

101 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
s1962a said:
I'm all for this. We should be encouraging people to have babies.

See Japan.
Where does money come from

Stick Legs

7,939 posts

184 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
90CHPAXL said:
To blanket judge everyone as having "made a choice" to have children later in life is abhorrent
Expecting other people to fund you is abhorrent.

If you can't afford IVF or unpaid leave how the hell are you going to afford to raise children properly.

Friends of ours went down the IVF route, very hard on them emotionally and financially but they wouldn't have changed it.
He sold his car and they did without some luxuries to afford it, much the same sacrifices as those of us who did not require IVF make once children arrive.

Murph7355

40,637 posts

275 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Countdown said:
I don't think it should be paid for by others.

I also don't think IVF should be paid for by the NHS.
Ditto on both counts.

leef44

5,100 posts

172 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Countdown said:
I don't think it should be paid for by others.

I also don't think IVF should be paid for by the NHS.
Ditto on both counts.
+2

miniman

28,760 posts

281 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
oyster said:
90CHPAXL said:
oyster said:
I m against paid leave for people having IVF simply because they ve made a lifestyle choice to have children later in life.

Just like NHS funding guidance, there would need to be a limit on paid leave, such as only available up to age 35.
To blanket judge everyone as having "made a choice" to have children later in life is abhorrent
Why?

I went through IVF. It would never have occurred to us to want paid leave.
You post reads as though you are saying IVF is for people who make a choice to have children later in life. That’s surely not what you mean?

vaud

56,236 posts

174 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
ARH said:
Next we will be asking for annual leave, for the time needed conceive naturally. smile

Mind you, who's going to book 3 minutes holiday rofl
3? Ah so you are planning a drink and foreplay as well. Got it.

vaud

56,236 posts

174 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Countdown said:
I don't think it should be paid for by others.

I also don't think IVF should be paid for by the NHS.
Ditto on both counts.
Personally I think it should be some level of contribution by the patient, maybe means tested or a straight forward x% contribution.

Otispunkmeyer

13,431 posts

174 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
ARH said:
Next we will be asking for annual leave, for the time needed conceive naturally. smile

Mind you, who's going to book 3 minutes holiday rofl
That long even? biglaugh

Ridgemont

8,005 posts

150 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
miniman said:
oyster said:
90CHPAXL said:
oyster said:
I m against paid leave for people having IVF simply because they ve made a lifestyle choice to have children later in life.

Just like NHS funding guidance, there would need to be a limit on paid leave, such as only available up to age 35.
To blanket judge everyone as having "made a choice" to have children later in life is abhorrent
Why?

I went through IVF. It would never have occurred to us to want paid leave.
You post reads as though you are saying IVF is for people who make a choice to have children later in life. That s surely not what you mean?
Odd response.

As you may know or not, IVF is hard work. Apart from the egg harvesting there is the ad nauseum (literally) injections which have to be administered like clock work to accelerate or decelerate fertility.

It is emotionally draining and hard on the woman.

But the idea that this should be ameliorated by time off is utterly fatuous. Why? The timings for injections are largely late evening and the next day apart from fatigue there is no impact?

The proposal makes no sense whatsoever.

Edited by Ridgemont on Tuesday 4th November 21:50

miniman

28,760 posts

281 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Whose response do you think is odd?