Delay in pension contributions being credited
Delay in pension contributions being credited
Author
Discussion

MK1RS Bruce

Original Poster:

717 posts

157 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Hi Folks

I was having a look at my workplace pension account and spotted that generally my contributions are not being credited to my pension account until at least three weeks after payday sometimes it is even longer.

I was wondering if this is the norm as it feels a bit unfair that I am potentially losing growth each month.

I have asked our HR department and been told its normal.....

Abc321

869 posts

114 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
There is another thread on this but to answer your question, entirely normal.

Deadline is 21st of the following month for payments to pension for employers. Most have it set up as a DD.

MK1RS Bruce

Original Poster:

717 posts

157 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Is the 21st of the following month a legal requirement?

Surely there is a considerable upside to large companies in terms of interest from holding onto employees money for the best part of 4 weeks?

craig1912

4,207 posts

131 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
MK1RS Bruce said:
Is the 21st of the following month a legal requirement?

Surely there is a considerable upside to large companies in terms of interest from holding onto employees money for the best part of 4 weeks?
It s swings and roundabouts. There could be considerable upside if the delay results in you buying when the market is down.
Over the life of a pension scheme the delay makes zero difference.

Edited by craig1912 on Tuesday 4th November 09:55

PM3

1,039 posts

79 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Does look a bit sharp practice ( and pathetic for a solvent business ) . I just checked, my last employer ( I refired early ) paid their and my contribution mid week the next week after the end of months last Friday ...... in other words a few days.
That was an employer with about 6,000 UK employee payrole. A global company with about 80K world staff , they certainly had their faults but F%$^ing around with stuff like this, HR , tax, employee support etc was definitely not one of the complaints.

Countdown

45,770 posts

215 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
MK1RS Bruce said:
Hi Folks

I was having a look at my workplace pension account and spotted that generally my contributions are not being credited to my pension account until at least three weeks after payday sometimes it is even longer.

I was wondering if this is the norm as it feels a bit unfair that I am potentially losing growth each month.

I have asked our HR department and been told its normal.....
Are you sure they're not taken by direct debit?

For our stakeholder scheme once monthly payroll is finalised we have to do a bunch of reconciliations. We then submit a return to the Pension provider and they take the money out of our account via DD.

As I mentioned on the other thread - there are a lot of recs to do at month end (Tax, NI, pensions, student loans, salary advances, car loans, gym loans, salary sacrifice schemes etc) so it can take time to sort out.

RacingStripes

643 posts

49 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Withing a day or so of being paid Aviva know how much my contribution is as it updates the amount of my last payment. I assume thats when they get the money. Its then 2-3 weeks before it gets actually added to my pension so mine seems to be an Aviva issue rather than my company not sending it.

MK1RS Bruce

Original Poster:

717 posts

157 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
craig1912 said:
MK1RS Bruce said:
Is the 21st of the following month a legal requirement?

Surely there is a considerable upside to large companies in terms of interest from holding onto employees money for the best part of 4 weeks?
It s swings and roundabouts. There could be considerable upside if the delay results in you buying when the market is down.
Over the life of a pension scheme the delay makes zero difference.

Edited by craig1912 on Tuesday 4th November 09:55
I would debate this as with a managed plan their intention is to continually grow the pot, therefore any time when your money is not in the market its not earning money, there might be ups and downs of fund etc but the general trend is always up.

craig1912

4,207 posts

131 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
MK1RS Bruce said:
I would debate this as with a managed plan their intention is to continually grow the pot, therefore any time when your money is not in the market its not earning money, there might be ups and downs of fund etc but the general trend is always up.
There are a many many periods over the years where there is negative growth. Of course the intention is to grow the pot but that can’t happen “continually”. Your money being “in the market” may well mean it is losing money.
Don’t worry about short term stuff, a short delay in investing money is neither here nor there and as I said may benefit you if funds bought when the market is down.

Nitro182

130 posts

53 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Its funny because i have often thought this , when the market goes through a torrid time (e.g Trumps tarrif antics ) the pension is never paid during those down days. The money is always credited when the market is at its peak ! very frustrating , however i understand how in the long run it makes no difference.

Peterpetrole

1,111 posts

16 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
craig1912 said:
There are a many many periods over the years where there is negative growth. Of course the intention is to grow the pot but that can t happen continually . Your money being in the market may well mean it is losing money.
Don t worry about short term stuff, a short delay in investing money is neither here nor there and as I said may benefit you if funds bought when the market is down.
Sorry but that's ridiculous.

You have to look at the average return. I started the other thread on this, my pension contribution still hasn't been paid from my end of September wages, I've probably lost £100 (salary sacrificing) just this month and someone else is getting that return on my money.

bigandclever

14,130 posts

257 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
MK1RS Bruce said:
Is the 21st of the following month a legal requirement?
Yes. The first bit of the part (b) blurb essentially means "by cheque".

the law said:
Prescribed time in which an employer must make payments to trustees or managers") of the Occupational Pension Schemes (Scheme Administration) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/1715

16. (1) For the purposes of section 49(8) of the 1995 Act (amount deducted from member’s pay) the “prescribed period”, in relation to an amount deducted from a member’s pay and payable to the trustees or managers of a scheme, is the period beginning with—
(a) the last day of the pay period in which the amount was deducted; and
(b) ending with the 19th day of the next month, where the payment is not made by means of electronic communication; or with the 22nd day of the next month, where the payment is made by means of electronic communication.
...
This version reflects amendments to Regulation 16 made under the Automatic Enrolment (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2013.

craig1912

4,207 posts

131 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Peterpetrole said:
Sorry but that's ridiculous.

You have to look at the average return. I started the other thread on this, my pension contribution still hasn't been paid from my end of September wages, I've probably lost £100 (salary sacrificing) just this month and someone else is getting that return on my money.
It isnt ridiculous. Yes yourminey should be paid over in a timely fashion and if you feel that strongly, complain about it but, in the overall timeframe a few weeks makes no difference to your personal pension and as I said in a declining market it is to your advantage (unless your pension isnt invested in equity funds).

Peterpetrole

1,111 posts

16 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
craig1912 said:
It isnt ridiculous. Yes yourminey should be paid over in a timely fashion and if you feel that strongly, complain about it but, in the overall timeframe a few weeks makes no difference to your personal pension and as I said in a declining market it is to your advantage (unless your pension isnt invested in equity funds).
It's a few weeks, EVERY month. In other words minimum 10% of the investment return per annum I would get if the money was credited on time.

And it's not a declining market, obviously.

lauda

4,050 posts

226 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Peterpetrole said:
craig1912 said:
It isnt ridiculous. Yes yourminey should be paid over in a timely fashion and if you feel that strongly, complain about it but, in the overall timeframe a few weeks makes no difference to your personal pension and as I said in a declining market it is to your advantage (unless your pension isnt invested in equity funds).
It's a few weeks, EVERY month. In other words minimum 10% of the investment return per annum I would get if the money was credited on time.

And it's not a declining market, obviously.
It's not a declining market, but nor is it a completely smooth upward trend. Any graph showing investment returns looks very jagged, even if the overall movement is up. A week or two delay will make next to no difference over a course of a lifetime of investment, so it really isn't worth worrying about.

Peterpetrole

1,111 posts

16 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
lauda said:
Peterpetrole said:
craig1912 said:
It isnt ridiculous. Yes yourminey should be paid over in a timely fashion and if you feel that strongly, complain about it but, in the overall timeframe a few weeks makes no difference to your personal pension and as I said in a declining market it is to your advantage (unless your pension isnt invested in equity funds).
It's a few weeks, EVERY month. In other words minimum 10% of the investment return per annum I would get if the money was credited on time.

And it's not a declining market, obviously.
It's not a declining market, but nor is it a completely smooth upward trend. Any graph showing investment returns looks very jagged, even if the overall movement is up. A week or two delay will make next to no difference over a course of a lifetime of investment, so it really isn't worth worrying about.
If the AVERAGE monthly delay in crediting your pension account over your working life is say 3 weeks, then that is 3/52 * AVERAGE return lost EVERY month of EVERY year on your contributions, which is 5.8%.

So if your pension fund goes up by £100,000 over ten years, you will have LOST 0.058*£100,000 equals £5,800. It's compound interest.

That £5800 has gone to your employer, and/or to your pension provider.

I can't express it any more clearly than that.


craig1912

4,207 posts

131 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
rolleyes

adccl8z

153 posts

152 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Peterpetrole said:
advice
some folk just don't care about 'the pennies'


rolleyes indeed

lauda

4,050 posts

226 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Peterpetrole said:
lauda said:
Peterpetrole said:
craig1912 said:
It isnt ridiculous. Yes yourminey should be paid over in a timely fashion and if you feel that strongly, complain about it but, in the overall timeframe a few weeks makes no difference to your personal pension and as I said in a declining market it is to your advantage (unless your pension isnt invested in equity funds).
It's a few weeks, EVERY month. In other words minimum 10% of the investment return per annum I would get if the money was credited on time.

And it's not a declining market, obviously.
It's not a declining market, but nor is it a completely smooth upward trend. Any graph showing investment returns looks very jagged, even if the overall movement is up. A week or two delay will make next to no difference over a course of a lifetime of investment, so it really isn't worth worrying about.
If the AVERAGE monthly delay in crediting your pension account over your working life is say 3 weeks, then that is 3/52 * AVERAGE return lost EVERY month of EVERY year on your contributions, which is 5.8%.

So if your pension fund goes up by £100,000 over ten years, you will have LOST 0.058*£100,000 equals £5,800. It's compound interest.

That £5800 has gone to your employer, and/or to your pension provider.

I can't express it any more clearly than that.
Let me explain it a bit more clearly then.

Unless your only investment is in cash and your only return is interest, your example is nonsense.

Assuming it's not all in cash, my original point stands.

Peterpetrole

1,111 posts

16 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
lauda said:
Peterpetrole said:
lauda said:
Peterpetrole said:
craig1912 said:
It isnt ridiculous. Yes yourminey should be paid over in a timely fashion and if you feel that strongly, complain about it but, in the overall timeframe a few weeks makes no difference to your personal pension and as I said in a declining market it is to your advantage (unless your pension isnt invested in equity funds).
It's a few weeks, EVERY month. In other words minimum 10% of the investment return per annum I would get if the money was credited on time.

And it's not a declining market, obviously.
It's not a declining market, but nor is it a completely smooth upward trend. Any graph showing investment returns looks very jagged, even if the overall movement is up. A week or two delay will make next to no difference over a course of a lifetime of investment, so it really isn't worth worrying about.
If the AVERAGE monthly delay in crediting your pension account over your working life is say 3 weeks, then that is 3/52 * AVERAGE return lost EVERY month of EVERY year on your contributions, which is 5.8%.

So if your pension fund goes up by £100,000 over ten years, you will have LOST 0.058*£100,000 equals £5,800. It's compound interest.

That £5800 has gone to your employer, and/or to your pension provider.

I can't express it any more clearly than that.
Let me explain it a bit more clearly then.

Unless your only investment is in cash and your only return is interest, your example is nonsense.

Assuming it's not all in cash, my original point stands.
The beauty of my example is it does not matter what the investment is in, stocks, bonds, cash or goldfish, you have lost 5.8% of the return. I suspect you now realise this.