Lammy taxi driver not guilty, France doesn't believe Lammy
Lammy taxi driver not guilty, France doesn't believe Lammy
Author
Discussion

andygo

Original Poster:

7,217 posts

274 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Something odd here. Why was Lammy carrying significant cash in a bag on a 5,000 Euro taxi ride?

Don't think the taxi driver liked Lammy and the French judge didn't either. Who would have thought it, lol.

Telegraph article about the court case. https://archive.ph/DrXJ

Apologies, cant spell believe, put my fingers on in the wrong order this morning.

matchmaker

8,897 posts

219 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Eh?

andygo

Original Poster:

7,217 posts

274 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
Eh?
Not sure what happened there, try again:

https://archive.ph/DrXJL


Ridgemont

8,005 posts

150 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
It is a fantastically bonkers story.

A 370 mile taxi ride!

This man was foreign secretary at the time.

The Sun report has so many WTAF details I had to read it through a few times. It reads like something out of Planes, trains and automobiles:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37203639/taxi-driver...


“When he [Lammy] got out of the vehicle, he said, ‘f***ing French, f***ing French’. I was afraid.” (Now imagine that in a Steve Martin accent)

“He claimed that while he did drive off with the couple’s suitcase and their cash he never intentionally left the scene knowing he still had their belongings.”

“ Mimun claimed that Green began screaming at him after saying she wanted to sit in the front during the 362 mile overnight trip.

She “had a crazy meltdown” and tried to open the door on the motorway during a row over the taxi fare, a French court heard.”


Wonderfully mad.








98elise

30,601 posts

180 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
andygo said:
Something odd here. Why was Lammy carrying significant cash in a bag on a 5,000 Euro taxi ride?

Don't think the taxi driver liked Lammy and the French judge didn't either. Who would have thought it, lol.

Telegraph article about the court case. https://archive.ph/DrXJ

Apologies, cant spell believe, put my fingers on in the wrong order this morning.
I'm not a Labour supporter and particularly dislike Lammy, yet I can't see what hes supposed to have done wrong.

It was a prepaid taxi ride, and the driver started demanding more money in cash. The driver then left with their luggage including cash and passports, which he later dropped off with the police. The taxi company then sacked the driver and the driver was charged.

Regardless of the driver not being found guilty that doesn't make his actions and less wrong, nor does it make Lammy at fault. Lammy had a taxi booked, and the taxi driver tried to shake him down for more cash.



98elise

30,601 posts

180 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Ridgemont said:
It is a fantastically bonkers story.

A 370 mile taxi ride!

This man was foreign secretary at the time.

The Sun report has so many WTAF details I had to read it through a few times. It reads like something out of Planes, trains and automobiles:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37203639/taxi-driver...


When he [Lammy] got out of the vehicle, he said, f***ing French, f***ing French . I was afraid. (Now imagine that in a Steve Martin accent)

He claimed that while he did drive off with the couple s suitcase and their cash he never intentionally left the scene knowing he still had their belongings.

Mimun claimed that Green began screaming at him after saying she wanted to sit in the front during the 362 mile overnight trip.

She had a crazy meltdown and tried to open the door on the motorway during a row over the taxi fare, a French court heard.


Wonderfully mad.
You're believing the taxi drivers version of the events? There was no extra fare to be paid in the first place. The driver was sacked, and charged by the police!

andygo

Original Poster:

7,217 posts

274 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Why would Lammy try and get a large amount of cash from a cash machine when he had lots in his bag? Why was he carrying a gun, well at least a holster?

He was foreign secretary at the time, why was he acting like a teewat?

Who was paying his taxi fare ultimately, taxpayer?

Halmyre

12,124 posts

158 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
98elise said:
Ridgemont said:
It is a fantastically bonkers story.

A 370 mile taxi ride!

This man was foreign secretary at the time.

The Sun report has so many WTAF details I had to read it through a few times. It reads like something out of Planes, trains and automobiles:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37203639/taxi-driver...


When he [Lammy] got out of the vehicle, he said, f***ing French, f***ing French . I was afraid. (Now imagine that in a Steve Martin accent)

He claimed that while he did drive off with the couple s suitcase and their cash he never intentionally left the scene knowing he still had their belongings.

Mimun claimed that Green began screaming at him after saying she wanted to sit in the front during the 362 mile overnight trip.

She had a crazy meltdown and tried to open the door on the motorway during a row over the taxi fare, a French court heard.


Wonderfully mad.
You're believing the taxi drivers version of the events? There was no extra fare to be paid in the first place. The driver was sacked, and charged by the police!
But Lammy...

andygo

Original Poster:

7,217 posts

274 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
98elise said:
You're believing the taxi drivers version of the events? There was no extra fare to be paid in the first place. The driver was sacked, and charged by the police!
The taxi driver was acquitted.

Earthdweller

16,575 posts

145 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
98elise said:
You're believing the taxi drivers version of the events? There was no extra fare to be paid in the first place. The driver was sacked, and charged by the police!
No, the French judicial system believed the taxi driver

The case was thrown out of court with the Judge saying he should never have been charged

98elise

30,601 posts

180 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
andygo said:
98elise said:
You're believing the taxi drivers version of the events? There was no extra fare to be paid in the first place. The driver was sacked, and charged by the police!
The taxi driver was acquitted.
And? He demanded extra cash and then drove off with their luggage, cash and passports. Thats not been disputed, its just the charge its not ended in a conviction.

Earthdweller

16,575 posts

145 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
98elise said:
andygo said:
98elise said:
You're believing the taxi drivers version of the events? There was no extra fare to be paid in the first place. The driver was sacked, and charged by the police!
The taxi driver was acquitted.
And? He demanded extra cash and then drove off with their luggage, cash and passports. Thats not been disputed, its just the charge its not ended in a conviction.
No intention to permanently deprive ... therefore it's not theft

He drove off, yes, directly to a Police Stn

eharding

14,634 posts

303 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
andygo said:
Why was he carrying a gun, well at least a holster?
Much as I can't stand Lammy, I can't believe he has ever been in possession of a firearm.

Not the least because within 10 minutes of taking said possession he would have inevitably have blown off both of his big toes and at least one of his testicles, and happily as far as I am aware he had never suffered injuries of this type.

butchstewie

61,492 posts

229 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
A holster hehe

God I love this place sometimes.

98elise

30,601 posts

180 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
eharding said:
andygo said:
Why was he carrying a gun, well at least a holster?
Much as I can't stand Lammy, I can't believe he has ever been in possession of a firearm.

Not the least because within 10 minutes of taking said possession he would have inevitably have blown off both of his big toes and at least one of his testicles, and happily as far as I am aware he had never suffered injuries of this type.
Agreed, highly unlikely. Ministers are not armed and he was travelling to a holiday destination.


Ridgemont

8,005 posts

150 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Don t get me wrong: I have no belief that the Taxi driver was telling the truth and I am absolutely sure the Foreign Secretary as was was perfectly innocent, despite the taxi driver also having been found innocent.

It s just a brilliant brilliant mad story tho!

Not grinding any agenda: it’s just funny as fk.

eharding

14,634 posts

303 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
98elise said:
Agreed, highly unlikely. Ministers are not armed and he was travelling to a holiday destination.
Can you imagine him asking his close protection people "Well, I'm off on holiday now so you're not coming with me, but can I have one of your guns just to be on the safe side?"

"Noooope. Not on your fcensoredking never-ever-ever nelly, Foreign Secretary"

Ridgemont

8,005 posts

150 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
eharding said:
98elise said:
Agreed, highly unlikely. Ministers are not armed and he was travelling to a holiday destination.
Can you imagine him asking his close protection people "Well, I'm off on holiday now so you're not coming with me, but can I have one of your guns just to be on the safe side?"

"Noooope. Not on you fcensoredking never-ever-ever nelly, Foreign Secretary"
hehe

He was in Italy officially as part of the King’s official state visit… as one of the top 3 ministers of the crown.

2 days later he is having a basil fawlty moment with ‘holsters’, partner attempting to throw herself out of a car, and a random taxi driver driving off with his possessions and a code locked briefcase.

Sorry but it’s just fking funny and mad wrapped up in one.

andygo

Original Poster:

7,217 posts

274 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Exactly. Can just imagine him wobbling round a ski resort looking for a cashpoint in his a DJ shouting f**** French.

hidetheelephants

31,794 posts

212 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
They haven't forgiven us for Agincourt yet. hehe