RE: Range Rover Sport TDV8 | Shed of the Week
RE: Range Rover Sport TDV8 | Shed of the Week
Yesterday

Range Rover Sport TDV8 | Shed of the Week

Two decades after its launch, the Sport makes its Shed debut - a V8, too...


Have you ever had that feeling where you're absolutely sure you've done something but it turns out you haven't? Shed has had that feeling a few times, usually at wedding anniversaries when it's more often than not swiftly followed by a different sort of feeling on the back of his noggin. 

Forgetting important dates isn't the problem this week, thankfully. Instead, it's the debut of a Range Rover Sport in SOTW. Shed can't believe he hasn't come up with one of these before, but unless he's done something very wrong with the filing system on his Amstrad that would appear to be the case. Ignoring the reputation of older cars wearing the Range Rover badge and the ominous fact that this is the 666th Shed of the Week he's scribbled, Shed is going to venture boldly forward and let the devil take the hindmost, whatever that means. 

What Shed definitely does remember is the huge hubbub that greeted the reveal of the eye-catching Range Stormer concept at the 2004 Detroit show. The production L320 Range Rover Sport that came out a year later looked less Evoquey than the Stormer and more Discovery-y, which wasn't that surprising seeing as how it was built on a modified, shortened version of the Disco 3's monocoque/separate chassis platform. For PR purposes, the blending of two chassis designs meant it combined robustness and refinement in one vehicle, with the bonus (but less talked about) advantage of cost-reducing parts commonality. The Sport didn't include a third row of seats but the excuse for that was that you couldn't be Sporty with seven people, something the postmistress might argue about. 

Shed is expecting to see a few comments about the car not sitting right, the powertrain being a bag of something your dog might do, the privacy glass looking rubbish and the screens looking worryingly vacant, all of which would normally come under the heading of fair comment. But for the life of him, he can't see much obviously wrong with this 3.6 TD V8 HSE, an exciting collection of letters and numbers suggesting power, hopefully some economy, and luxury. 

We'll get on to the first two of those in a minute, but first let's acknowledge the luxury part. The tan leather that goes nicely with the blue paint seems to have stood up well over the car's 18-year/120,000-mile life. The vendors haven't included a pic of the driver's seat from the entry side, an omission which usually means bolsters relentlessly over-bummed into collapse by a big and possibly smelly farmer. Nor do we have a boot pic that usually means unmentionable stains, although the interior that we can see, while not mint, is certainly not unminty.

Right, it's time to heave up the bonnet. Lurking underneath is the Ford-developed, Dagenham-built 'Lion' 3.6-litre twin-turbo 90-degree V8 diesel pushing out 272hp and a very handy sounding 472lb ft, figures that gave this near-2.7 tonne beast a 0-60mph time of 8.6 seconds and a top speed of 130mph. Unfortunately, it wasn't a super-efficient unit, choking you in 2005 with 294g/km of CO2 and choking your wallet in 2025 with an annual tax bill of £760. 

The 3.6's block and crankcase were CGI, which doesn't mean that they weren't real, but that they were made from relatively lightweight Compacted Graphite Iron. To Shed, compacted graphite iron sounds better than Compressed Powder Iron, but not by much. Actually, it was a reasonably reliable lump and with the right maintenance could run for 300k or more, the key phrase there being 'with the right maintenance’. Even if you were rigorous on that front, you could still end up with split intercooler hoses, EGR issues or faulty turbochargers. That last one could come about as a result of owners not realising there were two oil drain plugs, the second one being the turbo return line drain. Leaving that one untouched would eventually cause a buildup of sludge and premature turbo failure. 

You'll certainly be hoping that not much goes wrong, as there isn't a lot of underbonnet space to work with. The location of the turbochargers on either side of the engine meant that you had to remove the subframe to get them out, hardly the work of moments. In search of an easier life, RR techies would often just hoick the engine out and charge you accordingly.

Valve covers were tough to deal with too, not just because they were made of crack- and leak-prone plastic but also because they were integrated into parts of the intake manifold, making them difficult to access and remove when they had started to crack and leak. And before you attempted that, you had to remove the injectors, another fraught experience that could easily go terribly wrong. Getting to the gaskets for the oil cooler/oil filter mounting brackets took a good while too because of their location underneath a load of other gubbins between the heads. 

The six-speed auto bolted to this engine has a decent rep, though in a car that hasn't had regular fluid changes or that's been flogging around with horseboxes attached it can start to develop issues at, er, 120,000 miles. D'oh. There is zero info in the ad about servicing history, which is a shame. There's no visible towbar, either, but that doesn't mean it hasn't had one in the past. These Sports are good for towing mind, boasting a braked weight rating of 3,500kg. 

Also on the plus side it's just had an MOT done, which came up with only a couple of advisories for slight play in an offside front wheel bearing and non-excessive wear to a nearside front suspension bush. Earlier MOT certs indicate that problems have been promptly fixed, suggesting (if not guaranteeing) a decent maintenance regime. Corrosion to the near-side rear suspension mount was sorted out in 2024, the offside one having been done in the previous year. Non-excessive rust to the sills and rear chassis legs was reported in 2023 and that hasn't popped up since, so the assumption is that that was fixed, too. Suspension was air. Shed thinks that adaptive dampers were available but he doesn't know whether this car has them. Can you see any suspension sag? Shed can't, but then again he can't see much of anything these days.

It could be yours for £1,999. What are you waiting for? Don't answer that, we haven't got time.


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

tomsugden

Original Poster:

2,394 posts

247 months

Yesterday (06:07)
quotequote all
Awesome, I actually own one of these too!

carinaman

23,656 posts

191 months

Yesterday (06:14)
quotequote all
Great for content. The potential engine problems are far too scary for me.

tomsugden

Original Poster:

2,394 posts

247 months

Yesterday (06:16)
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Great for content. The potential engine problems are far too scary for me.
The TDV8 is the best one to have.

FrankandLynn

41 posts

12 months

Yesterday (06:28)
quotequote all
Good to see one of these that looks straight and un-abused. Personally, the lack of evidenced history would require balls of CGI (which I m sure used to be a manufacturing process called sintering - but that doesn’t sound sexy) to overcome, especially with the levels of complexity, and sheer bulk of the power unit, which would make any repairs a workshop-only endeavour. Great opportunity for a spannerman.

Edited by FrankandLynn on Friday 7th November 06:51

el romeral

1,794 posts

156 months

Yesterday (06:48)
quotequote all
That looks to be in good shape. Does not appear to be too much wrong with it and there is a lot which is right.

POIDH

2,282 posts

84 months

Yesterday (06:53)
quotequote all
Dammit. Despite the sensible part of my brain rolling around laughing at the RR bork and bills lottery, there's a part of me that thinks this thing would be ace for purring around Scotland in...

Rob 131 Sport

4,068 posts

71 months

Yesterday (06:54)
quotequote all
Who doesn’t love a V8 and apart from the original probably the best looking Range Rover.

Andy86GT

737 posts

84 months

Yesterday (07:17)
quotequote all
"relentlessly over-bummed into collapse by a big and possibly smelly farmer" ... rofl

Robertb

2,980 posts

257 months

Yesterday (07:19)
quotequote all
I had a test drive of a 3.0 2009 facelift one of these, really liked it!

Wasn’t quite brave enough as it was going to be my wife’s car and I really wanted the V8. Seems people hang on to them as there weren’t many about.

ElsieDriver

30 posts

154 months

Yesterday (07:20)
quotequote all
Andy86GT said:
"relentlessly over-bummed into collapse by a big and possibly smelly farmer" ... rofl
This - lollllllz. The writing on sotw is always top notch imho smile

Wren-went

1,015 posts

57 months

Yesterday (07:20)
quotequote all
Just not a fan of the MK1 Sport , whoever wants a Cheap Range rover Sport wants treatment, suppose if anyone wants a diesel it's definitely the TDV8.

As I'm not a lover of the original Range rover sport id rather have the Panda 4x4 from SOTW from the end of August.

Jazoli

9,408 posts

269 months

Yesterday (07:23)
quotequote all
Not in a million years, there’s a good reason a lot of the trade won’t touch them, one of the most unreliable problematic cars out there.

pb8g09

2,892 posts

88 months

Yesterday (08:15)
quotequote all
Chap I know is adamant that if there’s one of these parked outside a pub he can instantly pick out the owner every time when he goes in.

If I ever had so much cash to burn I think I’d buy a collection of Shed of the Weeks and see which lasts the longest in some kind of perverse wallet torture.

yme402

569 posts

121 months

Yesterday (08:16)
quotequote all
I love the irony of the RR Sport from this era. It’s Discovery equivalent in original wheels and a nice colour can be the epitome of good taste and old money. Whereas one of these suggests council estate thug.
I am not sure if these are an unreliable as their reputation implies. I think it’s a case of them dropping to such low values that they are bought by people that can’t afford to run these types of cars properly.
Funny old world ..

Edited by yme402 on Friday 7th November 08:22

georgeyboy12345

4,081 posts

54 months

Yesterday (08:18)
quotequote all
The Alan Partridge vibes are strong with this one

WPA

12,659 posts

133 months

Yesterday (08:24)
quotequote all
Nope, no chance not even at shed money or with a 60ft bargepole

Very good reason in most cases the trade will not touch them

cerb4.5lee

39,422 posts

199 months

Yesterday (08:24)
quotequote all
ElsieDriver said:
Andy86GT said:
"relentlessly over-bummed into collapse by a big and possibly smelly farmer" ... rofl
This - lollllllz. The writing on sotw is always top notch imho smile
It is I agree, and I enjoyed reading it too.

Would I be brave enough to go for this SOTW though? I want to, because I've always liked them, plus the idea of a V8 diesel interests me as well. Decisions, decisions.

Water Fairy

6,272 posts

174 months

Yesterday (08:29)
quotequote all
That's a lot of car for the money, but...........................................

Triumph Man

9,246 posts

187 months

Yesterday (08:30)
quotequote all
tomsugden said:
carinaman said:
Great for content. The potential engine problems are far too scary for me.
The TDV8 is the best one to have.
Yes I'd heard that too. I was talking to the chaps who rebuilt my Discovery (SDV6) engine, and he said the 3.6 was pick of the bunch for reliability. In fact there are a few companies now doing an excellent business in refitting Discovery 3/4 with the 3.6 TDV8 engine.

Cryssys

732 posts

57 months

Yesterday (08:35)
quotequote all
It's certainly as big as a shed so on that count it fits the description.

750 tax per year is a bit sobering though.