Do i need wifi 6, 6e, or7? (Mesh system)
Do i need wifi 6, 6e, or7? (Mesh system)
Author
Discussion

Phooey

Original Poster:

13,346 posts

188 months

I'm looking at the Amazon eero 6 mesh Wi-Fi router and noticed in some of the reviews there is also a wifi 6e or 7. Is a 6 ok for iphones, mac computers, Sonos etc? Thanks

Rick101

7,111 posts

169 months

I've got 6 and a repeater. Range is ok, not exceptional but ok.

I think you only need the higher spec units is you have a LOT of devices or want to cover a far greater area.
For a normal house, normal amount of connections, the 6 is fine.

worsy

6,356 posts

194 months

Common Wi-Fi Standards
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n): Released in 2009, this standard was a significant improvement, capable of speeds up to 600 Mbps by using both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands.

Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac): Introduced in 2013, it operates exclusively on the 5 GHz band and can achieve speeds up to 7 Gbps.

Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax): The current high-performance standard, which uses the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, can reach speeds of up to 9.6 Gbps and improves efficiency through technologies like OFDMA.

Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be): The next generation standard, which is in development and expected to offer even higher speeds and lower latency.

Older Standards: Standards like Wi-Fi 1 (802.11b) and Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g) are considered legacy and are much slower, operating on the 2.4 GHz band at speeds up to 11 Mbps and 54 Mbps respectively.

Wifi 6 will be plenty good enough at the moment. You'll pay a premium for 7, although it will future proof yourself a little longer, but in reality 6 will keep you going for years and years.

Haltamer

2,606 posts

99 months

2.4Ghz - Best range, lowest speed

5Ghz - Less range, higher speed

6Ghz (WIFI 6E) - Lowest range, highest speed

Wifi 7 devices may or may not be 'Tri Band'

If you're in a more dense living situation, such as flat / terraced housing / urban area with lots of wifi networks, Prioritise Wifi 6E / Tri Band Wifi 7 as having access to the higher band can reduce contention on the older 2.4 / 5Ghz Bands.

I recently upgraded to a cheap Cudy AP11000 so I could test out Wifi7 / Wifi 6E and have had good results up to 1Gb.

Personally, I'd avoid repeaters wherever at all possible - You only contribute to the network congestion - You're far better off getting an access point somewhere you can get a cable.

130R

6,969 posts

225 months

Worth considering how fast your internet is. I have 900Mbps up and down and just did a speed test over WiFi 6 and got 784Mbps. WiFi 7 can go faster (say if you had 2Gbps internet) but many devices don't fully support WiFi 7, or even support it at all, so will need to drop back to WiFi 6 anyway.

Phooey

Original Poster:

13,346 posts

188 months

Brill, thanks for replies. Will probably order that amazon system - I think I need 2 extenders - 5 bed house approx 2000sq/ft but some brick internal walls and current Virgin SuperHub 5 is poor. I think i'm on the 250mbs Virgin package

eta - SuperHub 5 not 3

worsy

6,356 posts

194 months

Phooey said:
Brill, thanks for replies. Will probably order that amazon system - I think I need 2 extenders - 5 bed house approx 2000sq/ft but some brick internal walls and current Virgin SuperHub 5 is poor. I think i'm on the 250mbs Virgin package

eta - SuperHub 5 not 3
Just to throw in, take a look at the Unifi LR. Then if you really need a "repeater", I'd use an ethernet over power to create a backhaul for another AP. If you didn't want to go Unifi then choose a mesh that will allow backhaul rather than wireless repeating.

Mr E

22,596 posts

278 months

Unless you have a huge amount of devices or a very serious need for inter device bandwidth within the house, 802.11ax is probably just fine.

.:ian:.

2,661 posts

222 months

Most of the Eero Wifi7 devices (ie. the cheap ones) are not true Wifi7, they are only 5ghz.
If it says dual band its only 2.4ghz and 5ghz.
Tri band will have 2.4/5 and 6ghz radios.

Out of 6 and 6e I would go for 6e if you can. Assuming you have devices that support 6e (not very common on sub-flagship devices)

JagYouAre

575 posts

189 months

I upgraded an older Google/Nest mesh network to the Eero Pro 6E and I've been very pleased with it so far. I've got 4 units dotted around the house (including the one plugged into the router) and they have worked flawlessly since I installed them. My theory for getting the 6E over the 6 was that it would future proof things somewhat, as they're not that cheap an investment.

Haltamer said:
Personally, I'd avoid repeaters wherever at all possible - You only contribute to the network congestion - You're far better off getting an access point somewhere you can get a cable.
I thought that the whole point of a mesh network was that it created its own thing so that everything wasn't fighting over a single wifi network, but I am pretty clueless when it comes to these things so feel free to explain like I'm 5 why that's not the case laugh

Atomic GTI

45 posts

126 months

I just added a pair of tp link deco x50 (wi fi 6) this weekend to reach the back of a 3 bed room house that had very poor wifi in the back room furthest from the router. works perfectly now with one next to the upstairs and one in the living room downstairs.

i was tempted to go 6E but the added cost put me off.