Dipped beam only Drivers
Dipped beam only Drivers
Author
Discussion

samoht

Original Poster:

6,802 posts

166 months

Yesterday (22:21)
quotequote all

Had it twice tonight - come up behind someone on a B-road, look to get past and can't see a thing - the driver in front isn't using their main beams at all. Not only does this make it hard to see ahead for a safe pass, naturally it also means they're driving slowly and erratically, as they can't see where the road goes.

Using your headlights properly isn't just for your benefit, it also allows a following driver to see ahead and make a safe pass if possible, and gives oncoming drivers or pedestrians advance warning of your approach.

It's a fundamental practice of driving at night on unlit roads, and if some people are truly too dim to operate a simple switch, maybe they should stay at home after dark.

(rant over).

Mr Tidy

28,238 posts

147 months

Yesterday (22:56)
quotequote all
samoht said:
Had it twice tonight - come up behind someone on a B-road, look to get past and can't see a thing - the driver in front isn't using their main beams at all. Not only does this make it hard to see ahead for a safe pass, naturally it also means they're driving slowly and erratically, as they can't see where the road goes.

Using your headlights properly isn't just for your benefit, it also allows a following driver to see ahead and make a safe pass if possible, and gives oncoming drivers or pedestrians advance warning of your approach.

It's a fundamental practice of driving at night on unlit roads, and if some people are truly too dim to operate a simple switch, maybe they should stay at home after dark.

(rant over).
If they are comfortable doing what they are why do you expect them to illuminate your path for you?

Can't you tell it is clear if there are no blinding lights on an SUV heading towards you? And without them you ought to be able to see which way the road goes without the glare!

TBH I think your problem is visual impairment - when did you last have an eye test?

I had no problem in my late teens riding motorbikes with a 35W headlamp bulb on unlit roads. But the Xenons on my current car were fine last night on unlit roads with no need for main-beam because living in Surrey they'd only be on for a couple of seconds at a time anyway!


V8 Stang

4,471 posts

203 months

That would be me! My dipped beams are more than sufficient for me to see.

I even turned off the auto high beam, as i find it annoying with them constantly coming on and off all the time!

POIDH

2,384 posts

85 months

OP, you want someone to illuminate the road for you, second guessing that you want to overtake? That's some serious entitlement.
If you can't see in the dark, slow down.

nickfrog

23,587 posts

237 months

Mr Tidy said:


Can't you tell it is clear if there are no blinding lights on an SUV heading towards you? And without them you ought to be able to see which way the road goes without the glare!

TBH I think your problem is visual impairment - when did you last have an eye test?
SUV lights are no more blinding than other cars. Think about where the low beam is aiming.

OP, I totally agree with you. It's very poor driving IMO. I suspect the HC suggests their use, but not sure.

Edited by nickfrog on Monday 1st December 06:42

Maxym

2,605 posts

256 months

I’m with the OP, although mainly for different reasons. If you drive at any decent speed at night on dipped beams, how do you see far enough ahead to be able to stop short of or safely avoid an obstruction? You can’t.

As for overtaking, pull out and put on main beam for a decent look.

Griffith4ever

6,017 posts

55 months

Main beam, then overtake if it's that bad. So you dazzle their mirror ? Hey ho.

Griffith4ever

6,017 posts

55 months

Maxym said:
I m with the OP, although mainly for different reasons. If you drive at any decent speed at night on dipped beams, how do you see far enough ahead to be able to stop short of or safely avoid an obstruction? You can t.

As for overtaking, pull out and put on main beam for a decent look.
I'm not so sure. Modern dipped beams are amazingly effective and I can totally understand if oncoming traffic is frequent enough to make it tiresome. I very, veryuch doubt your average always dipped driver is pushing on ;-)

parabolica

6,922 posts

204 months

samoht said:
Had it twice tonight - come up behind someone on a B-road, look to get past and can't see a thing - the driver in front isn't using their main beams at all. Not only does this make it hard to see ahead for a safe pass, naturally it also means they're driving slowly and erratically, as they can't see where the road goes.

Using your headlights properly isn't just for your benefit, it also allows a following driver to see ahead and make a safe pass if possible, and gives oncoming drivers or pedestrians advance warning of your approach.

It's a fundamental practice of driving at night on unlit roads, and if some people are truly too dim to operate a simple switch, maybe they should stay at home after dark.

(rant over).
Patiently waits for someone to link the ancient thread where some unhinged PH'er claimed the use of main beam headlights marked you out as an incompetent driver and deserved to be flogged and stoned to death.

Smint

2,624 posts

55 months

Followed a Punto on a dark B road once, can still visualise it 20 years later, driver didn't use main beam once and the dipped beam was as low setting as i've ever seen, even at 30mph max they were struggling to keep out of the ditch, how do you get to be so incompetent.

As a truck driver i make full use of main beams, not only for my benefit but also to light the road ahead for others...keep in mind i usually leave the yard around 4am and most other people are going about their honest days work so why not help each other out, safer for everyone concerned.

The lack of sensible main beam usage might be one of the reasons so many deer and badgers are being killed.

Wills2

27,417 posts

195 months

Mr Tidy said:
If they are comfortable doing what they are why do you expect them to illuminate your path for you?
You don't drive in a vacuum, it's not about what any individual driver is comfortable with as that would lead to utter chaos, so much so that they wrote a book about what you should, must and cannot do...

Look it up!


Zetec-S

6,553 posts

113 months

50-50 with the OP on this one. I used to drive 50 miles a day cross country B roads, the number of drivers who bimbled along on dipped beams bouncing off the hedgerows was shocking. But it didn't affect my ability to overtake as I knew the roads and knew which places were safe to pass.

I guess it's more inconvenient if you aren't so familiar with the roads, but if that's the case I'd probably drive a bit more cautiously anyway.

Huzzah

28,362 posts

203 months

A conundrum, what would you do.

10 miles from home unlit roads, mix of A, B & Dual carriageway, quietish traffic, dark but dry clear weather, 90s merc on halogens.

Dip beams fail, so only side lights or main beam. How would you tackle it.

RotorRambler

627 posts

10 months

Wife’s car has some fancy adaptive headlights.
You can have main beam on, it masks out the car in front and illuminates the road ahead around them, bit of a game changer.

Smint

2,624 posts

55 months

Huzzah said:
A conundrum, what would you do.

10 miles from home unlit roads, mix of A, B & Dual carriageway, quietish traffic, dark but dry clear weather, 90s merc on halogens.

Dip beams fail, so only side lights or main beam. How would you tackle it.
I take my learned friend back some 40 years, i'm driving a Daf 2800 artic tipper on an unlit A road in the dark, coming the other way is a Cortina mk5 on sidelight only and he loses control, probably hit the verge, and ends up stopped sideways across the road, i'm braking hard now with trailer tyres smoking (very little in load sensing or truck abs systems in those days) and stop violently some 6ft from his passenger door, hitch hiker beside me wishing at this point he'd found another lift.

Turns out dipped beam has failed so its either mains or side lights and he chose side, being a competent home mechanic i offered to turn down his beams so he could safely run on mains, nope, off he trundled on sides.

That was on the A510 between Finedon and Woodford/Cranford Northants decades before the A14 was poorly designed as dual darriagway only.

For your case you should have fogs built into the headlight units, assuming W124.

BoomerPride

4,073 posts

277 months

I'm with the OP. I think it's moronic not wanting to illuminate dark parts of the road where there may might be a cyclist, pedestrian, animal or debris lurking. Yes, it drives me mad too when I want to overtake one of these people.

WPA

12,851 posts

134 months

POIDH said:
OP, you want someone to illuminate the road for you, second guessing that you want to overtake? That's some serious entitlement.
If you can't see in the dark, slow down.

+1

nickfrog

23,587 posts

237 months

WPA said:
POIDH said:
OP, you want someone to illuminate the road for you, second guessing that you want to overtake? That's some serious entitlement.
If you can't see in the dark, slow down.

+1
You guys can't be serious, right? Or never drive at night.
What is the point of high beams and why would the HC say that you should use them? Can't you see the shape, projection and size of the beam pattern being significantly different?

Even at the same slow speed you are massively reducing your reaction time and therefore everyone else's safety too. The overtaking convenience is just a by product of this fundamental and elementary driving requirement.

DonkeyApple

65,241 posts

189 months

Zetec-S said:
50-50 with the OP on this one. I used to drive 50 miles a day cross country B roads, the number of drivers who bimbled along on dipped beams bouncing off the hedgerows was shocking. But it didn't affect my ability to overtake as I knew the roads and knew which places were safe to pass.

I guess it's more inconvenient if you aren't so familiar with the roads, but if that's the case I'd probably drive a bit more cautiously anyway.
Likewise. While on occasion it can be annoying to come up behind someone and for them to not illuminate the road ahead for you, it's just one of those things. I don't drive on mainbeam just because it's dark, dip is better as you get far more warning of oncoming vehicles, don't get dazzled by signage etc. and you can then use a flash of mainbeam when necessary such as when someone is heading towards you but still hidden from view.

Driving everywhere vaguely dark and permanently on mainbeam is a relatively new phenomena and with auto dip mildly annoying as no one comes off mainbeam before they dazzle oncoming vehicles any more as the auto systems are line of sight.

All I do is go onto mainbeam if someone appears behind me and clearly looks like they wish to pass although these days that's incredibly uncommon as everyone seems to be driving so much more slowly these days.

BoomerPride

4,073 posts

277 months

nickfrog said:
You guys can't be serious, right? Or never drive at night.
What is the point of high beams and why would the HC say that you should use them? Can't you see the shape, projection and size of the beam pattern being significantly different?

Even at the same slow speed you are massively reducing your reaction time and therefore everyone else's safety too. The overtaking convenience is just a by product of this fundamental and elementary driving requirement.
Absolutely 100% correct.