Electrics: Was this ever acceptable?
Discussion
I was over at my sister's house this weekend and she asked me to replace a ceiling rose (it was manky and the light cord was not insulated).
This is what I found...

Every single one of the wires had copper showing where they entered the terminal, the earth was twisted together and stuffed into the ceiling, and the cord (as mentioned) was just two bare wires (not insulation around the outside). There were signs that it had been arcing...
I've redone it all properly but my question is, was this ever acceptable (house is from the 70s) or was this done by an amateur? It feels as though this would always have been pretty bad?
There's a few other bits and pieces they want me to do (no new circuits, just replacing existing switches, replacing sockets etc) and I'm now a bit worried what else I might find...
This is what I found...
Every single one of the wires had copper showing where they entered the terminal, the earth was twisted together and stuffed into the ceiling, and the cord (as mentioned) was just two bare wires (not insulation around the outside). There were signs that it had been arcing...
I've redone it all properly but my question is, was this ever acceptable (house is from the 70s) or was this done by an amateur? It feels as though this would always have been pretty bad?
There's a few other bits and pieces they want me to do (no new circuits, just replacing existing switches, replacing sockets etc) and I'm now a bit worried what else I might find...
Edited by LennyM1984 on Sunday 7th December 15:29
When we re-wired our last house I found a twin and earth going from the main fuse box to the extension fuse box laid down along the kitchen wall, about two thirds of the way down - right as it happens under the main stop cock - there was a baker light junction box because the wire wasn t long enough. It needed to go another 5-6 meters
Edited by simon_harris on Sunday 7th December 10:12
It's not great but I've seen much worse posted on here. Shoving the earths up into the void at least reduced the number of wires stuffed into the cieling rose & there was a time when it wasn't a requirement to even run an earth in the lighting circuit. I'm not sure what you mean about the cord being bare wires as it looks like there's a layer of clear insulation on them.
All looks pretty standard for a ceiling rose. Not sure why they didn't use the earth terminal that's available, although many lighting circuits of that era didn't use cable with an earth as it wasn't really necessary. The single insulated pendant cable was common in the 50/60/70s.
Edited by megaphone on Sunday 7th December 15:17
Here were my concerns:
1. there was no sheath around the wires leading to the bulb holder (not the end of the world I admit) but the insulation had become damaged over the years and had become exposed
2. The wires going into each terminal have a considerable amount of exposed copper and had been arcing (hard to see in the photo because I had bent it out of the way but the exposed copper of one of the lives was almost touching the exposed copper of the neutral
3. Earthing not in the terminal block
4. No earth sheath (again not the end of the world)
5. No identification of the switched live (again, not dangerous but not exactly good practice)
ETA: based on the comments, perhaps I am just being a bit anal. My dad was an electronics engineer so I was also taught to be methodical
1. there was no sheath around the wires leading to the bulb holder (not the end of the world I admit) but the insulation had become damaged over the years and had become exposed
2. The wires going into each terminal have a considerable amount of exposed copper and had been arcing (hard to see in the photo because I had bent it out of the way but the exposed copper of one of the lives was almost touching the exposed copper of the neutral
3. Earthing not in the terminal block
4. No earth sheath (again not the end of the world)
5. No identification of the switched live (again, not dangerous but not exactly good practice)
ETA: based on the comments, perhaps I am just being a bit anal. My dad was an electronics engineer so I was also taught to be methodical
Edited by LennyM1984 on Sunday 7th December 14:58
Edited by LennyM1984 on Sunday 7th December 15:08
LennyM1984 said:
Here were my concerns:
3. Earthing not in the terminal block
4. No earth sheath (again not the end of the world)
Not sure why you'd expect either of those on an old install that no-one has updated in decades. Earth sheath is a relatively new thing and no-one used to crowd the rose by using the terminal (assuming one existed) if they could just use a block and stuff it out of the way - there's no particular benefit in using the one on the rose beyond access/visibility.3. Earthing not in the terminal block
4. No earth sheath (again not the end of the world)
If you're fiddling and you're competent you can improve it but it's not particularly bad compared to lots out there. Nothing looks melted for a start.
It used to be common for earth wires to be twisted together and then a sort of small porcelain screw-on insulator would screw over the twisted wires, using the twist as the thread. There may have been one that somebody's lost in the past.
Something more or less along these lines,
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Qizpcer-wire-caps/dp/B0DD...
Something more or less along these lines,
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Qizpcer-wire-caps/dp/B0DD...
Panamax said:
It used to be common for earth wires to be twisted together and then a sort of small porcelain screw-on insulator would screw over the twisted wires, using the twist as the thread. There may have been one that somebody's lost in the past.
Something more or less along these lines,
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Qizpcer-wire-caps/dp/B0DD...
Hope no one is using those.Something more or less along these lines,
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Qizpcer-wire-caps/dp/B0DD...
I found an old ceramic version in the garden, looked it up from the name on it, turned out the things were banned in something like 1970 which gives a clue about how safe they weren't.
JoshSm said:
Hope no one is using those.
I found an old ceramic version in the garden, looked it up from the name on it, turned out the things were banned in something like 1970 which gives a clue about how safe they weren't.
Wire nuts - still widely used in the US, where they have a real downer on wagos for some reason I found an old ceramic version in the garden, looked it up from the name on it, turned out the things were banned in something like 1970 which gives a clue about how safe they weren't.
I think there have been a lot of fake wago type connectors and incorrectly rated ones used, but they have an irrational hatred of them, but wire nuts, just fine!
JoshSm said:
LennyM1984 said:
Here were my concerns:
3. Earthing not in the terminal block
4. No earth sheath (again not the end of the world)
Not sure why you'd expect either of those on an old install that no-one has updated in decades. Earth sheath is a relatively new thing and no-one used to crowd the rose by using the terminal (assuming one existed) if they could just use a block and stuff it out of the way - there's no particular benefit in using the one on the rose beyond access/visibility.3. Earthing not in the terminal block
4. No earth sheath (again not the end of the world)
If you're fiddling and you're competent you can improve it but it's not particularly bad compared to lots out there. Nothing looks melted for a start.
I (as a DIYer) can't recall seeing a ceiling rose with an earth terminal before - sometimes the earths are snipped off or, if you're lucky, tucked into the ceiling. The bare copper showing doesn't bother me - what's going to happen? It's better than trapping the insulation in the screw.
Gassing Station | Homes, Gardens and DIY | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



