RE: Like hen's teeth: Skoda Superb 3.6 V6 for sale
RE: Like hen's teeth: Skoda Superb 3.6 V6 for sale
Tuesday 9th December

Like hen's teeth: Skoda Superb 3.6 V6 for sale

Sure, there are faster, fruitier wagons - but the Czech cruiser is still from a land that time forgot


Anyone who worked on a car magazine in 2008 will likely recall the second generation (i.e. B6) Superb with some fondness. The first generation had seemed like a mostly forgettable clone of the Passat, and Skoda failed to even bother with a wagon variant. Its follow-up though was the real deal: better looking, much better appointed and, most importantly, invested with its own identity - one that spoke to Skoda's place in the world. It was also, famously, as spacious as an empty football stadium. 

Predictably, photographers with kit to shift fawned all over it. But so did hacks, and in subsequent years the model walked away with some coveted gongs. To call it the thinking man’s large exec car is arguably pushing it a bit - nevertheless, it was another notch in Skoda’s relentless march up the appreciation scale, and unlike some previous attempts, proved the manufacturer had learnt to make the best of the VW Group’s resources.  

Moreover, it finally had a model that was not only worthy of the Laurin & Klement name - a nod to Skoda’s pre-war history - but also the 3.6-litre V6 made famous by several deep-throated installations elsewhere in the conglomerate. The EA390 unit was certainly capable of producing more than 256hp (the Passat famously earned more in rascally R36 format) yet the lower output befit the Superb’s more leisurely way of doing things while still accessing 6.5-second-to-62mph performance. 

Paired with the six-speed DSG transmission and four-wheel drive, the Superb easily earned its all-weather fast wagon spurs - though it’s fair to say that you only really grasped the full picture as you watched things disappear into its voluminous 633-litre boot. And if you managed to exhaust this space, the estate provided up to 1,865 litres with the seats folded, which seemed impossibly vast when you compared it to the cars that rivalled the big Skoda’s price when new. 

Of course, we’re talking about the era roughly commensurate with peak diesel, when ‘bigness’ was also a measure of your mpg - a figure that no naturally aspirated V6 owner could brag about. Thus, the range-topper was regularly overlooked in favour of the smaller engines that proliferated beneath it, typically the all-conquering 2.0-litre TDI that would eventually rival it in torque output. 

This made it a rare old bird even at the time; now it is a very seldom-seen reminder of the fabled old school, when characterful engines would find their way into all manner of box-fillers. The fact that this one, looking suitably Q-car-ish in pearlescent black, has made it to 2025 with just 65k on the clock is even more notable, and doubtless accounts for what seems like a fairly punchy valuation. But you won’t find another Superb like it on PH, and if it’s a curious itch you’ve always wanted to scratch, it might really be a case of now or never….


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

wistec1

Original Poster:

697 posts

61 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Black estates don't do it for me I'm afraid. This just needs a coffin in the back to look the part. Different colour and diesel would make more sense and to my eyes be more appealing having said that The Q car effect are rarity help it's cause a bit

No link to the listing?

corcoran

670 posts

294 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
wistec1 said:
Black estates don't do it for me I'm afraid. This just needs a coffin in the back to look the part. Different colour and diesel would make more sense and to my eyes be more appealing having said that The Q car effect are rarity help it's cause a bit

No link to the listing?
eerrrrrrr... what?

biggbn

28,958 posts

240 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I like that an awful lot. Be a brilliant way to cover long distances with the added bonus of buckets of practicality.

Screenwash

205 posts

42 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Can the DSG box handle the V6 torque? Or is it on borrowed time at 65,000 miles?!

5lab

1,780 posts

216 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
You'd have to really want the 6 pot. For the same money you could get a 1.4 hybrid that's half the age, same milage, fairly close in performance, a generation newer, and doesn't have penal tax and fuel usage

legless

1,929 posts

160 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Screenwash said:
Can the DSG box handle the V6 torque? Or is it on borrowed time at 65,000 miles?!
The V6 has pretty much exactly the same peak torque as the 170PS 2.0TDI, and it's likely to be kinder on the gearbox because it doesn't arrive as one giant gob of turbo boost.

WPA

12,943 posts

134 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
5lab said:
You'd have to really want the 6 pot. For the same money you could get a 1.4 hybrid that's half the age, same milage, fairly close in performance, a generation newer, and doesn't have penal tax and fuel usage
+1 Would make more sense

andy43

12,228 posts

274 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
WPA said:
5lab said:
You'd have to really want the 6 pot. For the same money you could get a 1.4 hybrid that's half the age, same milage, fairly close in performance, a generation newer, and doesn't have penal tax and fuel usage
+1 Would make more sense
But a Superb 1.4 hybrid would be a Superb 1.4 hybrid.

el romeral

1,841 posts

157 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
In black it looks like an Uber and not sure about the wheels. Apart from that the estate and V6 make it a very appealing car.

Lotobear

8,392 posts

148 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I had the 170bhp diesel Elegance version from this era and it was probabaly the best all round car I've ever owned - cavernous rear space, I could even pack mountain bikes vertically in the back

Mark-C

7,018 posts

225 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
WPA said:
5lab said:
You'd have to really want the 6 pot. For the same money you could get a 1.4 hybrid that's half the age, same milage, fairly close in performance, a generation newer, and doesn't have penal tax and fuel usage
+1 Would make more sense
But this isn't about making sense!

This is still Pistonheads and it's great that things like this are around as an option ... so beer from me for the person that bought it in the first place

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,514 posts

118 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Agree with the article that the estate was a good looking car for it's era. The saloon is another matter.....

You can actually pick up a next gen TSI with the 276 BHP engine for this sort of money. It also has a better gearbox and infotainment. No brainer.

LayZ

1,770 posts

262 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Similar money gets you a S212 E350 CDI with similar performance and 40mpg and not ruinous tax. If you care about ULEZ this might be better?

GreatScott2016

2,086 posts

108 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
corcoran said:
wistec1 said:
Black estates don't do it for me I'm afraid. This just needs a coffin in the back to look the part. Different colour and diesel would make more sense and to my eyes be more appealing having said that The Q car effect are rarity help it's cause a bit

No link to the listing?
eerrrrrrr... what?
I think you’ve just proved his point wink

Earthdweller

16,762 posts

146 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
andy43 said:
WPA said:
5lab said:
You'd have to really want the 6 pot. For the same money you could get a 1.4 hybrid that's half the age, same milage, fairly close in performance, a generation newer, and doesn't have penal tax and fuel usage
+1 Would make more sense
But a Superb 1.4 hybrid would be a Superb average 1.4 hybrid.

WPA

12,943 posts

134 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Earthdweller said:
andy43 said:
WPA said:
5lab said:
You'd have to really want the 6 pot. For the same money you could get a 1.4 hybrid that's half the age, same milage, fairly close in performance, a generation newer, and doesn't have penal tax and fuel usage
+1 Would make more sense
But a Superb 1.4 hybrid would be a Superb average 1.4 hybrid.
Yes but this is going to be £430 or £735 RFL for the year, the hybrid would be £195 plus 5 years newer and not far behind pace wise.

Also this is going to drink fuel 25mpg if your lucky

Om

2,117 posts

98 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Sheesh, this place is sounding more like a September issue of What Car...

Look on the bright side - its ULEZ compliant!

yme402

580 posts

122 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
For this era of Skoda Superb, the estate looked ok, but the saloon was a dog turd.

Vroom101

840 posts

153 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
This is one of those cars that’s caught in between a rock and a hard place.

You might think, ‘Oh, I can stomach the mediocre mpg as I don’t do too many miles’, but then you’re paying £735 in VED for it to be sitting on your drive for most of the time. Conversely, you might say ‘Well, if I’m paying all that tax, I might as well use the bugger’, and then have the double-whammy of a big old fuel bill on top.
All for a car that while being very capable, isn’t exactly exciting.

Like so many cars now, a worthwhile motor crippled by the policies of the government (and it really doesn’t matter who’s in power).