Is the Macan T much better than the standard Macan?

[Vroomer]

I'm considering a new/nearly new Macan but am unsure if it's worth paying extra for a Macan T over and above a standard Macan. Any guidance would be appreciated.

[WG]

I have had both and to be honest there is not a great deal of difference. I prefer the internal trim package that comes with the T ( leather dash and pinstripe seats) but that is just personal taste. The T has lower suspension and comes with PASM ( which my base Macan) did not have but in everyday driving on Dorset roads (lanes!) I really do not see the difference. Incidentally I could not spec Bose audio at the time of buying the T while I had Bose in the base Macan. Very little difference except that Both Bose speakers needed replacing within 18 months ( a common issue I believe) and I do struggle with the entertainment system generally - using a touch screen to select albums/tracks while on the move is downright dangerous. Overall great cars though ( but I am biased having owned Porsches for over35 years)

[Cheib]

I’d buy a slightly older car and get a higher spec/trim level personally. If the fuel consumption isn’t that important get something with the 6cylinder engine. There’s very, very little difference between the generations in terms of driving and the interior is better quality on the older cars….but you get a smaller screen.

[SkinnyPete]

Having driven them, I really would buy a 6 cylinder model.

[neilf]

Driven my Dads ‘23 6cyl S extensively. And had a new T as a courtesy car for a few weeks in Oct. Surprised how much I enjoyed the T, felt slightly lighter and more nimble than the S but I would still pick an S. The engine makes the whole experience more premium/luxury. IMO worth the uplift in price.

[WG]

I do get irritated by the S versus base comments (but I am a grumpy old git!)I wouldn't disagree that the S will be a more engaging drive but it depends what one wants out of the car. In my case, it is my daily "runaround" used occassionally for longer trips, so an S would be a waste of money as I would rarely get to use the additional power - I am lucky enough to have a 718 Spyder for my "driving fun". We do not know what the OP,s requirements are

[SkinnyPete]

WG said:

I do get irritated by the S versus base comments (but I am a grumpy old git!)I wouldn't disagree that the S will be a more engaging drive but it depends what one wants out of the car. In my case, it is my daily "runaround" used occassionally for longer trips, so an S would be a waste of money as I would rarely get to use the additional power - I am lucky enough to have a 718 Spyder for my "driving fun". We do not know what the OP,s requirements are

For me its not really about the power (although it does need more). The 4 cylinder just feels a bit cheap (it is) and very turbocharged/laggy.

A V6 is a totally different proposition.