Trump class battleship
Author
Discussion

Iamnotkloot

Original Poster:

1,879 posts

172 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
Interesting - ‘big’ gun surface ships, 10 to 25 in number. Pie in the sky?

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/what-do-we-know-ab...

Countdown

48,065 posts

221 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
About as likely as his 600% drug price decreases.

Simpo Two

91,908 posts

290 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
The Democrats will be in power before any are finished so they'll have to want them too. 'Biden Class' anyone?

BrettMRC

5,671 posts

185 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
Looks like the design for the arsenal ships?

Hugo Stiglitz

40,935 posts

236 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.

dukeboy749r

3,316 posts

235 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
It seems to be the actions of a narcist, desperate to have their 'brand' stuck on anything and everything.

To do so whilst still in the 'hotseat', speak of hubris at the highest level.


LunarOne

7,094 posts

162 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
dukeboy749r said:
It seems to be the actions of a narcist, desperate to have their 'brand' stuck on anything and everything.

To do so whilst still in the 'hotseat', speak of hubris at the highest level.
Isn't that the exact definition of the man?

98elise

31,785 posts

186 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
Hugo Stiglitz said:
It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.
How are drones going to get hundreds of miles out to sea, and what makes them better than missiles? Directed energy weapons will make light work of slow fragile drones let alone existing CIWS.

Same with subs. What makes a sub with drones any more capable than a sub with torpedos?

Hypersonics are over rated. Blinded by their own plasma on the atmosphere, and not easy to manoeuvre towards a moving target.

HocusPocus

1,951 posts

126 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
98elise said:
Hugo Stiglitz said:
It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.
How are drones going to get hundreds of miles out to sea, and what makes them better than missiles? Directed energy weapons will make light work of slow fragile drones let alone existing CIWS.

Same with subs. What makes a sub with drones any more capable than a sub with torpedos?
Ukraine conflict has shown how short the development cycle for drones has become. The future is probably more the spectacularly effective Zelenski class than a Trump class aircraft carrier.

Hugo Stiglitz

40,935 posts

236 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
Its job will be more visual PR in the homeland, a belief of power-

What actually works in a future battlefield is different to what's projected to the voters?

The game changer will be genetic bio weapons frown

98elise

31,785 posts

186 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
HocusPocus said:
98elise said:
Hugo Stiglitz said:
It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.
How are drones going to get hundreds of miles out to sea, and what makes them better than missiles? Directed energy weapons will make light work of slow fragile drones let alone existing CIWS.

Same with subs. What makes a sub with drones any more capable than a sub with torpedos?
Ukraine conflict has shown how short the development cycle for drones has become. The future is probably more the spectacularly effective Zelenski class than a Trump class aircraft carrier.
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile

eldar

24,995 posts

221 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
98elise said:
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile
Slow, cheap and short range. But in quantity.1,000 of them. With a couple of 'proper' missiles hiding among them.

RizzoTheRat

28,431 posts

217 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
98elise said:
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile
The term these days is One Way Attack Drones, and the difference between them and missiles didn't seem to be that big. The point is that they're cheap, they don't send one, they send dozens.

98elise

31,785 posts

186 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
98elise said:
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile
The term these days is One Way Attack Drones, and the difference between them and missiles didn't seem to be that big. The point is that they're cheap, they don't send one, they send dozens.
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?


Hugo Stiglitz

40,935 posts

236 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
98elise said:
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?
We already have had Predator drones for years. With war comes leaps in development. How far off are we from long range drones that have jamming tech and are hypersonic?

Low-profile in the waterline marine fastboats with high power laser-tech?

If you dont have any human element how do you defend against kamikaze drones attacks?

808 Estate

2,590 posts

116 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
It will probably spend its life in dry dock with keel spurs.

trevalvole

1,969 posts

58 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
He's been watching Under Siege, hasn't he?

Who wouldn't want a main battleship to play with, especially if you aren't personally picking up the tab?

98elise

31,785 posts

186 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
Hugo Stiglitz said:
98elise said:
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?
We already have had Predator drones for years. With war comes leaps in development. How far off are we from long range drones that have jamming tech and are hypersonic?

Low-profile in the waterline marine fastboats with high power laser-tech?

If you dont have any human element how do you defend against kamikaze drones attacks?
A long range, fast, sophisticated anti-ship "drone" is a missile. We can already defend against missile attacks.



isaldiri

24,080 posts

193 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
trevalvole said:
He's been watching Under Siege, hasn't he?

Who wouldn't want a main battleship to play with, especially if you aren't personally picking up the tab?
tbf... it's pretty useful for the US. their primary use for all these things are big phallic bits of military kit to impose their will on weaker 3rd world countries so it's pretty much well in line with their usual modus operandi I suppose....

RizzoTheRat

28,431 posts

217 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2025
quotequote all
98elise said:
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?
Shahed drones have a range of about 2500km. yes they're slower and easier to shoot down than a supersonic missile, but for the cost of one Onyx, they can send dozens of Shaheds

(edited for dumb autocorrect).


Edited by RizzoTheRat on Tuesday 23 December 16:16