Trump class battleship
Author
Discussion

Iamnotkloot

Original Poster:

1,791 posts

167 months

Interesting - ‘big’ gun surface ships, 10 to 25 in number. Pie in the sky?

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/what-do-we-know-ab...

Countdown

46,392 posts

216 months

About as likely as his 600% drug price decreases.

Simpo Two

90,533 posts

285 months

The Democrats will be in power before any are finished so they'll have to want them too. 'Biden Class' anyone?

BrettMRC

5,341 posts

180 months

Looks like the design for the arsenal ships?

Hugo Stiglitz

40,212 posts

231 months

It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.

dukeboy749r

3,060 posts

230 months

It seems to be the actions of a narcist, desperate to have their 'brand' stuck on anything and everything.

To do so whilst still in the 'hotseat', speak of hubris at the highest level.


LunarOne

6,687 posts

157 months

dukeboy749r said:
It seems to be the actions of a narcist, desperate to have their 'brand' stuck on anything and everything.

To do so whilst still in the 'hotseat', speak of hubris at the highest level.
Isn't that the exact definition of the man?

98elise

30,905 posts

181 months

Hugo Stiglitz said:
It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.
How are drones going to get hundreds of miles out to sea, and what makes them better than missiles? Directed energy weapons will make light work of slow fragile drones let alone existing CIWS.

Same with subs. What makes a sub with drones any more capable than a sub with torpedos?

Hypersonics are over rated. Blinded by their own plasma on the atmosphere, and not easy to manoeuvre towards a moving target.

HocusPocus

1,741 posts

121 months

98elise said:
Hugo Stiglitz said:
It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.
How are drones going to get hundreds of miles out to sea, and what makes them better than missiles? Directed energy weapons will make light work of slow fragile drones let alone existing CIWS.

Same with subs. What makes a sub with drones any more capable than a sub with torpedos?
Ukraine conflict has shown how short the development cycle for drones has become. The future is probably more the spectacularly effective Zelenski class than a Trump class aircraft carrier.

Hugo Stiglitz

40,212 posts

231 months

Its job will be more visual PR in the homeland, a belief of power-

What actually works in a future battlefield is different to what's projected to the voters?

The game changer will be genetic bio weapons frown

98elise

30,905 posts

181 months

HocusPocus said:
98elise said:
Hugo Stiglitz said:
It will be obsolete before its launched. The way autonomous; long range drones and highly capable drone subs will be where it's needed firmly in its timeline.

Hyper sonic missiles alone are a big fear already.
How are drones going to get hundreds of miles out to sea, and what makes them better than missiles? Directed energy weapons will make light work of slow fragile drones let alone existing CIWS.

Same with subs. What makes a sub with drones any more capable than a sub with torpedos?
Ukraine conflict has shown how short the development cycle for drones has become. The future is probably more the spectacularly effective Zelenski class than a Trump class aircraft carrier.
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile

eldar

24,726 posts

216 months

98elise said:
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile
Slow, cheap and short range. But in quantity.1,000 of them. With a couple of 'proper' missiles hiding among them.

RizzoTheRat

27,557 posts

212 months

98elise said:
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile
The term these days is One Way Attack Drones, and the difference between them and missiles didn't seem to be that big. The point is that they're cheap, they don't send one, they send dozens.

98elise

30,905 posts

181 months

RizzoTheRat said:
98elise said:
They have a short development cycle because they are simple. That also makes them slow, short range and vulnerable.

Imagine how good a "drone" would be against a ship if it was long range, fast, stealthy and packed a big punch. We could call them missiles smile
The term these days is One Way Attack Drones, and the difference between them and missiles didn't seem to be that big. The point is that they're cheap, they don't send one, they send dozens.
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?


Hugo Stiglitz

40,212 posts

231 months

98elise said:
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?
We already have had Predator drones for years. With war comes leaps in development. How far off are we from long range drones that have jamming tech and are hypersonic?

Low-profile in the waterline marine fastboats with high power laser-tech?

If you dont have any human element how do you defend against kamikaze drones attacks?

808 Estate

2,506 posts

111 months

It will probably spend its life in dry dock with keel spurs.

trevalvole

1,847 posts

53 months

He's been watching Under Siege, hasn't he?

Who wouldn't want a main battleship to play with, especially if you aren't personally picking up the tab?

98elise

30,905 posts

181 months

Hugo Stiglitz said:
98elise said:
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?
We already have had Predator drones for years. With war comes leaps in development. How far off are we from long range drones that have jamming tech and are hypersonic?

Low-profile in the waterline marine fastboats with high power laser-tech?

If you dont have any human element how do you defend against kamikaze drones attacks?
A long range, fast, sophisticated anti-ship "drone" is a missile. We can already defend against missile attacks.



isaldiri

22,960 posts

188 months

trevalvole said:
He's been watching Under Siege, hasn't he?

Who wouldn't want a main battleship to play with, especially if you aren't personally picking up the tab?
tbf... it's pretty useful for the US. their primary use for all these things are big phallic bits of military kit to impose their will on weaker 3rd world countries so it's pretty much well in line with their usual modus operandi I suppose....

RizzoTheRat

27,557 posts

212 months

98elise said:
How do they get close in the first place? Cheap means limited range, as does the reliance on fibre optics to avoid jamming. If they did get through what enables them to resist armour piercing rounds, or directed energy weapons?
Shahed drones have a range of about 2500km. yes they're slower and easier to shoot down than a supersonic missile, but for the cost of one Onyx, they can send dozens of Shaheds

(edited for dumb autocorrect).


Edited by RizzoTheRat on Tuesday 23 December 16:16